Rejection Pathways in Heart Transplant Recipients

Since the beginning of this century experimental heart transplantations in animal studies were performed.' These studies were started in Rotterdam in the seventies to compare heterotopic and orthotopic heart transplantations, and to study the process of chronic rejection. The history of the first human heart transplantation started in South-Africa and it was carried out by Barnard in 1967. Several cardiac surgeons around the world initiated new transplantation programmes. However, the problems with patient and donor organ selection as well as with immunosuppression, severe rejection and infection were common. This meant in 1968, only 22% of all transplants survived after the first year.6 Consequently, many centres stopped their programmes. Heart transplantation, as a routine treatment for organ failure, only became possible with the development in 1973 of the endomyocardial biopsy technique for monitoring acute rejection? and in 1975 by the further discovery of cyclosporin A. In the early eighties cyclosporin A was successfully introduced as an immunosuppressive medicine post clinical heart transplantation.' Cyclosporin A acts by binding to calmodulin and thereby inhibits the transcription of the IL-2 and IFN-y gene." With the development of these new processes, a 50% survival rate after 5 years was achieved in 1982

The biological effects of IL-21 signaling on B-cell-mediated responses in organ transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection has emerged as one of the major issues limiting the success of organ transplantation. It exerts a highly negative impact on graft function and outcome, and effective treatment is lacking. The triggers for antibody development, and the mechanisms leading to graft dysfunction and failure, are incompletely understood. The production of antibodies is dependent on instructions from various immunocytes including CD4 T-helper cells that secrete interleukin (IL)-21 and interact with antigen-specific B-cells via costimulatory molecules. In this article, we discuss the role of IL-21 in the activation and differentiation of B-cells and consider the mechanisms of IL-21 and B-cell interaction. An improved understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in antibody-mediated complications after organ transplantation could lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies, which control humoral alloreactivity, potentially preventing and treating graft-threatening antibody-mediated rejection

The role of follicular T helper cells in the humoral alloimmune response after clinical organ transplantation

Over the past decade, antibody-mediated or humoral rejection in combination with development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has been recognized as a distinct and common cause of transplant dysfunction and is responsible for one-third of the failed allografts. Detailed knowledge of the mechanisms that initiate and maintain B-cell driven antidonor reactivity is required to prevent and better treat this antidonor response in organ transplant patients. Over the past few years, it became evident that this response largely depends on the actions of both T follicular helper (Tfh) cells and the controlling counterparts, the T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells. In this overview paper, we review the latest insights on the functions of circulating (c)Tfh cells, their subsets Tfh1, Tfh2 and Tfh17 cells, IL-21 and Tfr cells in antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). This may offer new insights in the process to reduce de novo DSA secretion resulting in a decline in the incidence of ABMR. In addition, monitoring these cell populations could be helpful for the development of biomarkers identifying patients at risk for ABMR and provide novel therapeutic drug targets to treat ABMR

Peripheral monitoring of direct and indirect alloantigen presentation pathways in clinical heart transplant recipients

It has been reported that the response to alloantigens presented by the direct and indirect pathway may be of differential relevance after human kidney transplantation. Accordingly, we monitored these routes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of heart transplant patients from before transplantation and up to 2 years thereafter in an attempt to find a correlation with the clinical status of the patients. Both before and after transplantation, comparable proportions of PBMC samples reacted in mixed lymphocyte culture to nondepleted donor spleen cells (direct route), but never to donor cells depleted for antigen-presenting cells (indirect route). In contrast, the latter route could easily be activated by a nominal antigen and persisted after transplantation, although the proportion of PBMC samples responding was significantly suppressed, irrespective of the occurrence of rejection. Consequently, complete removal of antigen-presenting cells from the stimulator population in a mixed lymphocyte culture with PBMC as responder is not a suitable tool for measuring indirect presentation of alloantigens, and therefore not relevant for monitoring the immunological status of heart transplant recipients

Immunosuppression Has Long-Lasting Effects on Circulating Follicular Regulatory T Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: FoxP3+ follicular regulatory T cells (Tfr) have been identified as the cell population controlling T follicular helper (Tfh) cells and B cells which, are both involved in effector immune responses against transplanted tissue. Methods: To understand the biology of Tfr cells in kidney transplant patients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination immunosuppression, we measured circulating (c)Tfh and cTfr cells in peripheral blood by flow cytometry in n = 211 kidney transplant recipients. At the time of measurement patients were 5–7 years after transplantation. Of this cohort of patients, 23.2% (49/211) had been previously treated for rejection. Median time after anti-rejection therapy was 4.9 years (range 0.4–7 years). Age and gender matched healthy individuals served as controls. Results: While the absolute numbers of cTfh cells were comparable between kidney transplant recipients and healthy controls, the numbers of cTfr cells were 46% lower in immunosuppressed recipients (p < 0.001). More importantly, in transplanted patients, the ratio of cTfr to cTfh was decreased (median; 0.10 vs. 0.06), indicating a disruption of the balance between

Boosting the VZV-Specific Memory B and T Cell Response to Prevent Herpes Zoster After Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundSolid organ transplant recipients are at high risk to develop (complicated) herpes zoster (HZ). Booster vaccination could prevent HZ. However, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients show poor immunological responses to vaccinations. We studied the effect of a live attenuated VZV booster vaccine on VZV-specific B and T cell memory responses in ESRD patients and healthy controls. NL28557.000.09, www.toetsingonline.nlMethodsVZV-seropositive patients, aged ≥50 years, awaiting kidney transplantation, were vaccinated with Zostavax®. Gender and age-matched VZV-seropositive potential living kidney donors were included as controls. VZV-specific IgG titers were measured before, at 1, 3 and 12 months post-vaccination. VZV-specific B and T cell responses before, at 3 months and 1 year after vaccination were analysed by flow-cytometry and Elispot, respectively. Occurrence of HZ was assessed at 5 years post-vaccination.Results26 patients and 27 donors were included. Median VZV-specific IgG titers were significantly higher at all time-points post-vaccination in patients (mo 1: 3104 IU/ml [1967-3825], p&lt;0.0001; mo 3: 2659 [1615-3156], p=0.0002; mo 12: 1988 [1104-2989], p=0.01 vs. pre: 1397 [613-2248]) and in donors (mo 1: 2981 [2126-3827], p&lt;0.0001; mo 3: 2442 [2014-3311], p&lt;0.0001; mo 12: 1788 [1368-2460], p=0.0005 vs. pre: 1034 [901-1744]. The patients’ IgG titers were comparable to the donors’ at all time-points. The ratio VZV-specific B cells of total IgG producing memory B cells had increased 3 months post-vaccination in patients (0.85 [0.65-1.34] vs. pre: 0.56 [0.35-0.81], p=0.003) and donors (0.85 [0.63-1.06] vs. pre: 0.53 [0.36-0.79], p&lt;0.0001) and remained stable thereafter in donors. One year post-vaccination, the percentage of CD4+ central memory cells had increased in both patients (0.29 [0.08-0.38] vs. 0.12 [0.05-0.29], p=0.005) and donors (0.12 [0.03-0.37] vs. 0.09 [0.01-0.20], p=0.002) and CD4+ effector memory cells had increased in donors (0.07 [0.02-0.14] vs. 0.04 [0.01-0.12], p=0.007). Only 1 patient experienced HZ, which was non-complicated.ConclusionVZV booster vaccination increases VZV-specific IgG titers and percentage VZV-specific memory T-cells for at least 1 year both in ESRD patients and healthy controls. VZV-specific memory B cells significantly increased in patients up to 3 months after vaccination. Prophylactic VZV booster vaccination prior to transplantation could reduce HZ incidence and severity after transplantation