Collision avoidance in road crossing : Behavior of children with and without hemiparesis

This thesis examines the skill of avoiding collisions with approaching moving objects, and in particular the competences of primary-school children and children with motor impairment. Pedestrian road crossing is chosen as the point of departure. Chapter 2 reviews children’s capacities on four component skills; namely, finding a safe place to cross, looking behaviour, perceptual judgements whether or not to cross, and the visual guidance of walking across the road. Chapter 3 and 4 aim to investigate whether the increased collision proneness of young children is associated with age-related differences in the perception of the affordance crossability and the visual control of movements. Chapter 5 and 6 aim to investigate whether the perception of the affordance crossability in children with hemiparesis is different from that in typically-developing children, and to identify the underlying movement planning and control processes that are involved in road- crossing behaviour of children with hemiparetic CP.Savelsbergh, G.J.P. [Promotor]Kamp, G.J. van der [Copromotor

Planning and control in a manual collision avoidance task by children with hemiparesis

We examined whether deficits in planning and control during a manual collision avoidance task in children with hemiparesis are associated with damage to the left or right hemisphere (LHD and RHD). Children pushed a doll across a scale-size road between two approaching toy cars. Movement onset and velocity served as indicators of planning and control. In Experiment 1, children with hemiparesis collided more frequently, and controlled velocity less appropriately compared to typically-developing children. Children with LHD initiated their movement later than children with RHD. Experiment 2 compared the preferred and non-preferred hand of children with LHD and RHD. Children with RHD crossed less with their non-preferred hand, while children with LHD initiated later than children with RHD. Moreover, the groups showed differences in velocity control. It is argued that planning deficits may be related to LHD. The hypothesized association between control deficits and RHD, however, was not confirmed

Anticipatory reaching of seven- to eleven-month-old infants in occlusion situations

The present study examined 7- to 11-month-old infants' anticipatory and reactive reaching for temporarily occluded objects. Infants were presented with laterally approaching objects that moved at different velocities (10, 20, and 40. cm/s) in different occlusion situations (no-, 20. cm-, and 40. cm-occlusion), resulting in occlusion durations ranging between 0 and 4. s. Results show that except for object velocity and occlusion distance, occlusion duration was a critical constraint for infants' reaching behaviors. We found that the older infants reached more often, but that an increase in occlusion duration resulted in a decline in reaching frequency that was similar across age groups. Anticipatory reaching declined with increasing occlusion duration, but the adverse effects for longer occlusion durations diminished with age. It is concluded that with increasing age infants are able to retain and use information to guide reaching movements over longer periods of non-visibility, providing support for the graded representation hypothesis (Jonsson & von Hofsten, 2003) and the two-visual systems model (Milner & Goodale, 1995). © 2010 Elsevier Inc

What does it mean to be a politician? Introduction

Contains fulltext : 219687.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)11 juni 20201 p

Five- to 12 year-olds’ control of movement velocity in a dynamic collision avoidance task

We investigated age-related differences in a dynamic collision avoidance task that bears a resemblance to pedestrian road crossing. Five- to seven-year-old children, ten- to twelve-year-old children and adults were instructed to push a doll across a small-scale road between two toy vehicles, which approached one after the other. We analysed the number of attempted crossings, the number of collisions, movement onset times and movement velocity control. The youngest children attempted to cross less often, but collided more frequently than the adults. This age effect could be attributed to differences in the way the children and adults controlled movement velocity. The youngest children attained the velocity that was required for safe travel too late, particularly when the gaps between the toy vehicles were small. The age differences in movement onset strategies were less clear-cut. The findings are discussed within a framework that proposes distinct roles of vision in action planning and action production. © 2008 The British Psychological Society

Visual timing and adaptive behavior in a road-crossing simulation study

In this road-crossing simulation study, we assessed both participant's ability to visually judge whether or not they could cross a road, and their adaptive walking behavior. To this end, participants were presented with a road inside the laboratory on which a bike approached with different velocities from different distances. Eight children aged 5-7, ten children aged 10-12, and ten adults were asked both to verbally judge whether they could cross the road, and to actually walk across the road if possible. The results indicated that the verbal judgments were not similar to judgments to actually cross the road. With respect to safety and accuracy of judgments, groups did not differ from each other, although the youngest group tended to be more cautious. All groups appeared to use a strategy to cross the road based both on the distance and the velocity of the approaching bike. Young children waited longer on the curb before crossing the road than older children and adults. All groups adjusted their crossing time to the time-to-arrival of the bike. These findings are discussed in relation to the ecological psychological approach and the putative dissociation between vision for perception (i.e. verbal judgment) and vision for action (i.e. actual crossing). (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved