أسباب إختلاف المفسرين و التعامل معها من خلال تفسير النكت و العيون للماوردي في سورتي مريم و طه: THE REASONS FOR THE DIFFERENCE OF COMMENTATORS AND DEALING WITH THEM THROUGH THE TAFSEER OF MAWARDI (ANNUKAT WAL UYOUN) IN TWO SURAH (MARYAM & TUA-HA)

The one who examines the books of interpretation will find a difference between the sayings of the commentators when interpreting one verse. So knowing the reasons for this difference between them is very important, in order to know how to deal with this difference in the books of interpretation, especially when there are many sayings. And the disagreement regarding its acceptance or rejection is based on its reasons. As for the difference that was based on justified reasons and valid rules, then it is sound, it is permissible and acceptable. This research aims to study the knowledge of the commendable reasons on which the difference is built and the type of difference. Is this difference, diversity or contradiction? I chose the Tafsir of Al-Mawardi to take the different sayings from it through the two surahs of Maryam and Taha. The Mawardi exegete combined these various sayings in his interpretation without explicitly stating any reason. This research aims to study how to deal with it, that is, how to deal with these different statements when there are different reasons, do we accept them or not? And is it possible to combine these sayings when there is a similar reason in them. And do we prefer one of the sayings when there is a strong reason. The aim of this research is to find out the effect, that is, how did the reasons affect the meaning of the verse?