21 research outputs found

    Health state utilities associated with attributes of treatments for hepatitis C

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Cost-utility analyses are frequently conducted to compare treatments for hepatitis C, which are often associated with complex regimens and serious adverse events. Thus, the purpose of this study was to estimate the utility associated with treatment administration and adverse events of hepatitis C treatments. DESIGN: Health states were drafted based on literature review and clinician interviews. General population participants in the UK valued the health states in time trade-off (TTO) interviews with 10- and 1-year time horizons. The 14 health states described hepatitis C with variations in treatment regimen and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 182 participants completed interviews (50 % female; mean age = 39.3 years). Utilities for health states describing treatment regimens without injections ranged from 0.80 (1 tablet) to 0.79 (7 tablets). Utilities for health states describing oral plus injectable regimens were 0.77 (7 tablets), 0.75 (12 tablets), and 0.71 (18 tablets). Addition of a weekly injection had a disutility of −0.02. A requirement to take medication with fatty food had a disutility of −0.04. Adverse events were associated with substantial disutilities: mild anemia, −0.12; severe anemia, −0.32; flu-like symptoms, −0.21; mild rash, −0.13; severe rash, −0.48; depression, −0.47. One-year TTO scores were similar to these 10-year values. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events and greater treatment regimen complexity were associated with lower utility scores, suggesting a perceived decrease in quality of life beyond the impact of hepatitis C. The resulting utilities may be used in models estimating and comparing the value of treatments for hepatitis C. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0649-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

    Impact of Daily Electronic Laboratory Alerting on Early Detection and Clinical Documentation of Acute Kidney Injury in Hospital Settings

    No full text
    Acute kidney injury, especially early-stage disease, is a common hospital comorbidity requiring timely recognition and treatment. We investigated the effect of daily laboratory alerting of patients at risk for acute kidney injury as measured by documented International Classification of Diseases diagnoses. A quasi-experimental study was conducted at 8 New York hospitals between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. Education of clinical documentation improvement specialists, physicians, and nurses was conducted from July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014, prior to initiating daily hospital-wide laboratory acute kidney injury alerting on January 1, 2015. Incidence based on documented International Classification of Diseases diagnosis of acute kidney injury and acute tubular necrosis during the intervention periods (3 periods of 6 months each: January 1 to June 30 of 2015, 2016, and 2017) were compared to one preintervention period (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2014). The sample consisted of 269 607 adult hospital discharges, among which there were 39 071 episodes based on laboratory estimates and 27 660 episodes of documented International Classification of Diseases diagnoses of acute kidney injury or acute tubular necrosis. Documented incidence improved significantly from the 2014 preintervention period (5.70%; 95% confidence interval: 5.52%-5.88%) to intervention periods in 2015 (9.89%; 95% confidence interval, 9.66%-10.12%; risk ratio = 1.73, P < .001), 2016 (12.76%; 95% confidence interval, 12.51%-13.01%; risk ratio = 2.24, P < .001), and 2017 (12.49%; 95% confidence interval, 12.24%-12.74%; risk ratio = 2.19, P < .001). A multifactorial intervention comprising daily laboratory alerting and education of physicians, nurses, and clinical documentation improvement specialists led to increased recognition and clinical documentation of acute kidney injury
    corecore