Improved Arterial Visualization in Cerebral CT Perfusion-Derived Arteriograms Compared with Standard CT Angiography: A Visual Assessment Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Invasive cerebral DSA has largely been replaced by CTA, which is noninvasive but has a compromised arterial view due to superimposed bone and veins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether arterial visualization in CTPa is superior to standard CTA, which would eliminate the need for an additional CIA scan to assess arterial diseases and therefore reduce radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we included 24 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage for whom CTA and CTP were available. Arterial quality and presence of superimposed veins and bone in CTPa were compared with CTA and scored by 2 radiologists by using a VAS (0%-100%). Average VAS scores were determined and VAS scores per patient were converted to a 10-point NRS. Arterial visualization was considered to be improved when the highest rate (NRS 10, VAS > 90%) was scored for arterial quality, a RESULTS: Average VAS scores in the proximal area were 94% (arterial quality), 4% (presence of bone), and 7% (presence of veins). In this area, the sign test showed that a significant number of cases scored NRS 10 for arterial quality (P < .02) and NRS 1 for the presence of superimposed veins and bone (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral CTPa shows improved arterial visualization in the proximal area compared with CTA, with similar arterial quality but no superimposed bone and veins

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of temporal lobe white matter in patients with histologically proven hippocampal sclerosis

The purpose of this study was to assess temporal lobe white matter changes accompanying hippocampal sclerosis on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using single-voxel H-1 MR spectroscopy and to strengthen the hypothesis that these white matter changes are caused by myelin alterations. In 11 patients with histologically proven hippocampal sclerosis, preoperative coronal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images were visually assessed by two experienced neuroradiologists for hippocampal signal increase and size decrease, atrophy of collateral white matter, and temporal lobe gray/white matter demarcation loss. Single-voxel H-1 MR spectroscopy of the white matter of each anterior temporal lobe was also performed, excluding the amygdala and hippocampus. The N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA)/choline and NAA/creatine ratios were calculated. In 12 healthy volunteers both temporal lobes were spectroscopically examined. In all patients the excised hippocampi were histologically assessed for the presence of sclerosis, and the excised neocortical temporal lobes were examined for gray and white matter abnormalities. MRI abnormalities were found on the right in six patients, on the left in four, and one scan was normal. Hippocampal signal increase was seen in nine patients, hippocampal size decrease in ten, atrophy of collateral white matter in nine, and gray/white matter demarcation loss in six. A significant decrease in the NAA/choline ratio was found in temporal lobe white matter ipsilateral to the pathologic hippocampus (symptomatic side), compared with the contralateral, asymptomatic side (P <0.01), and also compared with controls (P <0.001). The ipsilateral NAA/creatine ratio was also significantly decreased (P <0.05) compared with the contralateral side and the control subjects (P <0.001). Histological examination showed hippocampal sclerosis to a different degree in all patients, Neither gliosis nor cortical dysplasia was found in the ipsilateral, symptomatic temporal lobe, Significant decrease in the mean of NAA/choline ratios is found in temporal lobe white matter of patients with histologically confirmed hippocampal sclerosis, As this indicates neuronal loss or dysfunction, the number of axons may be reduced, with associated decrease in myelin density. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Curved reconstructions versus three-dimensional surface rendering in the demonstration of cortical lesions in patients with extratemporal epilepsy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. TO compare the visibility and localization of extratemporal cortical lesions in extratemporal epilepsy by using curved reconstruction (CR) and three-dimensional surface rendering (3D SR) of 3D-acquired MR images and to study the degree of confidence with which localizations are made, particularly at the gyral level. METHODS. Twenty patients with extratemporal epilepsy, based on seizure symptomatology and/or scalp electroencephalographic registrations, with an extratemporal structural lesion on conventional MR imaging, were selected for this study by a neuroradiologist with extensive experience in the assessment of epilepsy patients, Transverse T2 spin-echo, coronal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and transverse 3D-acquired/two-dimensionally reconstructed T1 MR images were used for the selection. A second neuroradiologist (observer 1) and a radiology resident (observer 2) assessed CR and 3D SR in random order. Both observers were masked to all patient data. The subjective visibility of lesions and gyral location were scored. The interobserver agreements for lesion visibility and localization and for degree of confidence were compared for CR and 3D SR. RESULTS. For both observers, the lesion was visible in 55% of 3D SRs and 95% of CRs. The proportion with "very clearly visible" lesions on 3D SR was 19% (4/20) according to observer 1 and 30% (6/20) according to observer 2. For CR, this proportion was substantially higher: 55% for both observers. This difference was significant for observer 1 but not for observer 2, The interobserver agreement was high for both methods. Agreement on gyral localization was 28% for CR and 40% for 3D SR. The percentage of similar confidence scores for the same gyral localization and for gyral localization with a maximum difference of one gyrus between the observers did not differ significantly for CR or 3D SR. The observers were more often confident in agreed cases in CR and moderately confident in 3D SR, CONCLUSIONS. These results suggest that CRs of the brain surface are superior to 3D SR for the visualization of extratemporal cortical lesions in patients with drug-resistant extratemporal epilepsy, If lesions are seen, no significant difference was found between the two techniques for localization; however, the degree of confidence appears higher for CR at the gyral level

Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Background Stents are an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis, but previous trials have not established equivalent safety and efficacy. We compared the safety of carotid artery stenting with that of carotid endarterectomy. Methods The International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) is a multicentre, international, randomised controlled trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes. Patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. Randomisation was by telephone call or fax to a central computerised service and was stratified by centre with minimisation for sex, age, contralateral occlusion, and side of the randomised artery. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. Patients were followed up by independent clinicians not directly involved in delivering the randomised treatment. The primary outcome measure of the trial is the 3-year rate of fatal or disabling stroke in any territory, which has not been analysed yet. The main outcome measure for the interim safety analysis was the 120-day rate of stroke, death, or procedural myocardial infarction. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470. Findings The trial enrolled 1713 patients (stenting group, n=855; endarterectomy group, n=858). Two patients in the stenting group and one in the endarterectomy group withdrew immediately after randomisation, and were not included in the ITT analysis. Between randomisation and 120 days, there were 34 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 4.0%) events of disabling stroke or death in the stenting group compared with 27 (3.2%) events in the endarterectomy group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% CI 0.77-2.11). The incidence of stroke, death, or procedural myocardial infarction was 8.5% in the stenting group compared with 5.2% in the endarterectomy group (72 vs 44 events; HR 1.69, 1.16-2.45, p=0.006), Risks of any stroke (65 vs 35 events; HR 1.92, 1.27-2.89) and all-cause death (19 vs seven events; HR 2.76, 1.16-6.56) were higher in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group. Three procedural myocardial infarctions were recorded in the stenting group, all of which were fatal, compared with four, all non-fatal, in the endarterectomy group. There was one event of cranial nerve palsy in the stenting group compared with 45 in the endarterectomy group. There were also fewer haematomas of any severity in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group (31 vs 50 events; p=0.0197). Interpretation Completion of long-term follow-up is needed to establish the efficacy of carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy. In the meantime, carotid endarterectomy should remain the treatment of choice for patients suitable for surgery