Acute myelogenous leukemia in first relapse treated with two consecutive autologous bone marrow transplantations: A pilot study

The feasibility and the antileukemic activity of a double sequential autograft has been evaluated in 3 patients affected by AML in first hematological relapse. Bone marrow collection and cryopreservation was performed twice: during first complete remission (CR) and during second CR. At the time of relapse patients underwent first ABMT with BAVC preparative regimen achieving a second CR without any remarkable complications. After 4, 5 and 4 months respectively a second ABMT was performed with a different preparative regimen, consisting of cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation (Cy + F-TBI). A delay in platelet recovery was observed after the second procedure as compared to the first, while neutrophils recovery was comparable, 1 patient died in CR (on day +91 after second ABMT) of interstitial pneumonitis. 2 patients are alive and well without evidence of disease after 46 and 53 months of unmaintained second CR. This experience shows the high antieleukemic potential of treatment with a double sequential autograft; 2 relapsed patients in fact are long-term survivors with a second CR longer than the first

In vitro purging with BCR-ABL antisense oligodeoxynucleotides does not prevent haematologic reconstitution after autologous bone marrow transplantation.

We treated a patient with chronic myeloid leukaemia in accelerated phase with autologous bone marrow transplantation. Before reinfusion, cells were purged in vitro with a 26-mer phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotide specific for the B2A2 junction. Incubation with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides produced a 24 and 41% reduction of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells, respectively. However, an in vitro test previously performed as a screening for patient inclusion in this procedure, revealed a 38 and 75% reduction of colony formation after 24-h and 168-h incubation, respectively. The patient showed bone marrow engraftment 15 days after reinfusion and haematological reconstitution after 17 and 25 days for platelets and neutrophils, respectively. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization in interphase nuclei, we demonstrated the presence of a proportion of Ph-negative cells in repeated controls after the autograft. The patient is now in unmaintained complete haematological remission 9 months after the autograft

Management of coronary disease in patients with advanced kidney disease

BACKGROUND Clinical trials that have assessed the effect of revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease have routinely excluded those with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS We randomly assigned 777 patients with advanced kidney disease and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing to be treated with an initial invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography and revascularization (if appropriate) added to medical therapy or an initial conservative strategy consisting of medical therapy alone and angiography reserved for those in whom medical therapy had failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. A key secondary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 123 patients in the invasive-strategy group and in 129 patients in the conservative-strategy group (estimated 3-year event rate, 36.4% vs. 36.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.29; P=0.95). Results for the key secondary outcome were similar (38.5% vs. 39.7%; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.29). The invasive strategy was associated with a higher incidence of stroke than the conservative strategy (hazard ratio, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.32; P=0.004) and with a higher incidence of death or initiation of dialysis (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.11; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease, advanced chronic kidney disease, and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction

Health status after invasive or conservative care in coronary and advanced kidney disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, the primary analysis showed no significant difference in the risk of death or myocardial infarction with initial angiography and revascularization plus guideline-based medical therapy (invasive strategy) as compared with guideline-based medical therapy alone (conservative strategy) in participants with stable ischemic heart disease, moderate or severe ischemia, and advanced chronic kidney disease (an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 or receipt of dialysis). A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status. METHODS We assessed health status with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) before randomization and at 1.5, 3, and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome of this analysis was the SAQ Summary score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less frequent angina and better function and quality of life). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate the treatment effect with the invasive strategy. RESULTS Health status was assessed in 705 of 777 participants. Nearly half the participants (49%) had had no angina during the month before randomization. At 3 months, the estimated mean difference between the invasive-strategy group and the conservative-strategy group in the SAQ Summary score was 2.1 points (95% credible interval, 120.4 to 4.6), a result that favored the invasive strategy. The mean difference in score at 3 months was largest among participants with daily or weekly angina at baseline (10.1 points; 95% credible interval, 0.0 to 19.9), smaller among those with monthly angina at baseline (2.2 points; 95% credible interval, 122.0 to 6.2), and nearly absent among those without angina at baseline (0.6 points; 95% credible interval, 121.9 to 3.3). By 6 months, the between-group difference in the overall trial population was attenuated (0.5 points; 95% credible interval, 122.2 to 3.4). CONCLUSIONS Participants with stable ischemic heart disease, moderate or severe ischemia, and advanced chronic kidney disease did not have substantial or sustained benefits with regard to angina-related health status with an initially invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy