21 research outputs found
University regulation and university\u2013industry interaction: a performance analysis of Italian academic departments
In a context characterized by public spending reviews and research funding shortages,
governments in several countries are putting pressure on universities to increase
their applied research activity, intensify their interaction with industry, and
attract funding from the nonacademic domain. The economic literature provides
rich evidence on the convergence between institutional factors and individual-level
characteristics that are influencing university involvement in knowledge transfer
activities. The aim of this article is to investigate the impact of universities\u2019
regulation of knowledge transfer activities on the institutional capability to raise
funding from research contracts and consultancies. Based on extensive department-
level data on university funding, we address the characteristics of institutional
knowledge transfer practices and investigate how these activities influence
the intensity of funding to Italian universities
The Italian Competition Authority Clears A Merger In The Postal Sector Creating A Near-Monopoly Position In Multiple Markets (Poste Italiane / Nexive)
Economia dei big data: lineamenti del dibattito in corso e alcune riflessioni di policy
There is increasing awareness that the collection of big data and the new data analytics capabilities will have deep social and economic impacts. Benefits are expected in terms of higher quality and variety of goods and services, higher firms' productivity and, ultimately, more sustainable and robust economic development. At the same time, some concerns are raised in terms of possible negative consequences on the way the competitive processes in the big data and related markets will unfold. This paper presents an overview of the most significant features of the ongoing scientific debate, with the aim of critically deriving some implications on the most relevant policy dimensions, with an eye to the Italian case
Stay or emigrate? How social capital influences selective migration in Italy
ABSTRACTInternal migration in Italy has been characterised by deep changes in its composition, because of the growing share of high-skilled migrants (the emigration of which contributes to widening the internal brain drain) and the decreasing proportion of low-skilled migrants. Furthermore, recent interest in the literature in the role played by noneconomic elements in affecting migration decisions has highlighted the importance of a nonpecuniary factor, namely social capital (SC). For these reasons, this paper empirically investigates the role played by SC in interprovincial selective migration, considering migrants according to two education levels using data on 103 Italian provinces (2004–2012). The main findings reveal that provincial SC mainly contributes to reducing the migration flows of low-skilled individuals, albeit while also deterring the emigration of high-skilled individuals. Control variables confirm that better income conditions represent an important determinant of high-skilled migrants most likely because they seek to earn more, while better socioeconomic conditions such as labour market efficiency mostly influence those with a lower level of education
Does Government Research Funding to Universities Substitute, Complement or Leverage Industry Funding?. CeLEG Working Papers
There is increasing political pressures on universities to
raise research
funding
from
industry
and
contribute
actively
to
economic
development.
However,
whether
or
not
promotion
of
the
so
called
third
mission
in
universities,
of
interacting
with
industry,
is
effective
without
government
funding
remains
an
open
question,
and
we
do
not
know
whether
government
funding
\u2018crowds-\uad\u2010out\u2019
or
\u2018crowds-\uad\u2010in\u2019
business
funding.
In
this
paper
we
argue
that
government
funding
provides
universities
with
the
vital
resources
to
carry
out
research
activities
whose
results
can
be
transferred
at
a
later
stage
to
industry,
leveraging
private
funding.
It
is
inevitable,
therefore,
that
without
government
support
to
academic
institutions
knowledge
transfer
activities
will
be
hampered,
and
financial
cuts
to
universities
may
reduce
rather
than
foster
their
self-\uad\u2010financing
capability.
The
empirical
analysis
presented
in
this
paper
is
based
on
financial
data
for
the
whole
population
of
Italian
university
departments
engaged
in
research
in
the
Engineering
and
Physical
Sciences.
Based
on
a
set
of
probit
and
tobit
cross-\uad\u2010
section
and
panel
data
models
this
paper
investigates
the
impact
of
different
forms
of
public
funding
to
university
departments,
on
their
abilities
to
attract
private
funding
The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy
The economics literature provides rich evidence on the convergence between the institutional factors and individual-level characteristics influencing the involvement of academia in knowledge transfer activities and spinoff creation. However, little is known about the effects of internal university regulations on academic entrepreneurship. In the last ten years, spinoff activity from academia in Italy has been intensive and most academic institutions have policies related to the regulation of academic entrepreneurship practices, known as 'Regolamento Spinoff'. This paper investigates the impact of the set of university rules governing the creation of spinoffs, on institutional capability to generate new ventures. Based on panel-data analysis using detailed university-level data on academic spinoffs, we identify three classes of institutionally-defined rules that can motivate faculty members to establish a spinoff company. These are: general rules and procedures; rules regulating monetary incentives; rules related to the entrepreneurial risk. We find that at least some rules pertaining to each of these three classes have some effect on spinoff creation. In particular, we find that monetary incentives play a significant role in promoting academic spinoff activity, and that overly-restrictive university rules regarding contract research have a negative effect on spinoff creation
The effects of public research funding on academic engagement
This paper provides an empirical investigation of the effects of public funding of academic research on external funding obtained via research contracts, consultancies and "research to order" activities more generally. These informal collaborations between university departments and business are relevant because of their high relational content and consequent spillover effects based on learning by interacting. This study uses data on the population of university departments and research institutes in Italy engaged in research in one of the 14 scientific areas identified by the Italian National Research Council. The results of our analysis show that the availability of external funding has a positive impact on the probability of accessing further external funding and on its amount. We also find some complementarity between the amount of public funding, from both the European Union and the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the capability of university departments to collect funding via research contracts and consultancies
The Effects of Public Research Funding on Academic Engagement
This paper provides an empirical investigation of the effects of public funding of academic research on external funding obtained via research contracts, consultancies and «research to order» activities more generally. These informal collaborations between university departments and business are relevant because of their high relational content and consequent spillover effects based on learning by interacting.
This study uses data on the population of university departments and research institutes in Italy en- gaged in research in one of the 14 scientific areas identified by the Italian National Research Council. The results of our analysis show that the availability of external funding has a positive impact on the probabil- ity of accessing further external funding and on its amount. We also find some complementarity between the amount of public funding, from both the European Union and the Italian Ministry of Education, Uni- versity and Research and the capability of university departments to collect funding via research contracts and consultancies
Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities?
There is growing political pressure on universities to intensify their interaction with industry and to
enlarge their own research funding options, in a context characterised by increasing constraints on public
spending. However, whether the successful achievement of such a political desired outcome is consistent
with a restriction of government funding is not clear and requires further investigation. As a matter of
fact, there is scant empirical evidence on whether and to what extent government funding affects the
external funding options available to universities, in particular those related to research and consulting
activities. By using a set of probit and tobit panel data models estimated on financial data for the whole
population of Italian university departments engaged in research in the Engineering and Physical Sciences,
this paper provides evidence that government funding to universities complements funding from
research contracts and consulting, contributing to increasing universities\u2019 collaboration with industry
and activating knowledge transfer processes
The two sides of academic research: do basic and applied activities complement each other?
It is generally acknowledged that the cuts in government funding for research implemented
in several European countries will induce academic researchers to increase their
interaction with industry to promote the acquisition of private funding for research.
Indirectly this implies that there will be a shift in the focus of academic scientific activity
from basic to applied research via private research contracts and consultancy work.
The aim of our paper is to assess the extent of the trade-off between basic research and
applied activity in academic research departments. We use data for the universe of Italian
academic departments over the period 2006\u20132011 and estimate whether increased
applied activity is substituting or complementing basic research activity. We provide
empirical evidence of a strong substitution effect for life sciences departments, but this
was less for engineering and technology departments, while there does not seem to
be evidence of a substitution effect for departments whose scientific activity revolves
around basic science