Unpredictable chronic mild stress procedure.

<p>Unpredictable chronic mild stress procedure.</p

Schematic representation of experimental design.

<p>(A) and effects of UCMS on body weight (B), measured over the complete behavioral testing period. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM. ** p < 0.01.</p

qRT-PCR assays.

<p>(A) Hippocampal gene expression analysis revealed significantly decreased TH mRNA levels (n = 5) and DAT (n = 5) mRNA levels of UCMS exposed BL6 mice, relative to unexposed controls. (C) No such differences were observed between DBA groups. (B) PFC gene expression analysis of BL6 groups. (D) PFC gene expression analysis revealed decreased BDNF (n = 5) mRNA levels in DBA2 mice, relative to unexposed controls (n = 6). Values are expressed as mean +/- SEM. *, p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.</p

Contextual discrimination threat conditioning.

<p>(A) During context acquisition conditioning, mice exposed to UCMS showed less freezing behavior over time when compared to non-exposed controls. (B) Equivalent freezing behavior between UCMS-exposed and control groups was observed during generalization tests. (C) During context discrimination training, BL6 CTRL mice learned to distinguish context A from context B, whereas UCMS exposed mice did not. (D) DBA mice overall showed little freezing behavior and failed to distinguish context A from B, regardless of UCMS exposure. (E) A second generalization test revealed increased contextual discrimination behavior in unexposed BL6 controls. Values are expressed as mean +/- SEM. *, p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.</p

Surface expression of GluA1 is not increased in <i>Tspan6</i> KO hippocampal primary neurons.

<p><b>(A)</b> Representative images from 14 days <i>in vitro</i> WT and <i>Tspan6</i> KO hippocampal primary neurons stained with an extracellular N-terminal domain GluA1 antibody before fixation (surface expression), and with VGlut1 antibody after fixation. <b>(B)</b> Histograms comparing mean (±S.E.M) density <b>(</b>particles/10μm) and area (μm²<b>)</b> from total cell surface GluA1 particles. <b>(C)</b> Histograms comparing mean (±S.E.M) density <b>(</b>particles/10μm) and area (μm²<b>)</b> from synaptic surface GluA1 particles. Scale bar = 10μm. <i>n</i> = 28 (WT) and 31 (<i>Tspan6</i> KO) neurons from 4 different embryos, 2 independent cultures.</p

<i>Tspan6</i> mice show normal behavior in the Morris water maze test.

<p>Mice were trained in the hidden platform Morris water maze for 10 days (4 trials/day) and tested with a probe trial (100s) on day 6 and 11. <b>(A)</b> Curve shows no differences between <i>Tspan6</i> KO and WT mice in the learning-related decrease in escape latency (time required to find the platform) during the acquisition phase. <b>(B)</b> Probe trial performance illustrate spatial memory for the platform position as both groups show a preference for the quadrant where the platform was located during the training (target quadrant) with no significant differences between the groups. <b>(C)</b> Spatial learning was analyzed in more detail quantifying the time that the mice spend swimming in the specific area of the quadrant were the platform was during the training showing no changes in the KO animals compared to controls. <i>n</i> = 12 WT, 21 KO animals.</p

Tspan6 does not affect synapse formation and maturation <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>.

<p><b>(A)</b>Representative images from WT and <i>Tspan6</i> KO hippocampal primary neurons transfected with EGFP and fixed after 14 days <i>in vitro</i> (scale bar = 20 μm). Right panels show box sections in higher magnification (scale bar = 10μm). 15 neurons and more than 90 dendritic sections were examined from 3 independent cultures. Only spines more than 80μm from the soma were analyzed. Histograms compare mean (±S.E.M) filopodia and spine density (number/10μm of dendrite). <b>(B)</b> Golgi staining of 100 μm coronal sections from 10 month-old <i>Tspan6</i> KO and WT mice. Scale bar = 100 μm. <b>(C)</b> Representative images of dendritic spines from basal secondary dendrites from CA1 hippocampal neurons and the IMARIS reconstruction to analyze spine morphology. Scale bar = 5μm. Histograms compare mean (±S.E.M) spine density (number/10μm of dendrite) <b>(D)</b>, length <b>(E)</b> and head width <b>(F)</b> between Tspan6 KO and WT mice. <i>n</i> = 19 to 22 neurons from 3 different mice.</p

Primers sequence for PCR amplification.

<p>Primers sequence for PCR amplification.</p

<i>Tspan6</i> KO mice show an increased basal synaptic transmission and impaired LTP in the CA3-CA1 synapses of the hippocampus.

<p><b>(A)</b> Input-output relations between stimulus intensity applied to the Schaffer collateral fibers and slope of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) recorded in the <i>stratum radiatum</i> of CA1. Right panel show representative traces of fEPSP at 90μA stimulation from Tspan6 KO and control acute slices. <i>n</i> = 30 WT and 25 <i>Tspan6</i> KO slices from 9 to 12 different mice per group. (F _(11,583) = 9.447, p<0.0001, Repeated measurements ANOVA). <b>(B)</b> LTP was induced in CA1 neurons by theta-burst stimulation (5 trains, each with 10 bursts at 5 Hz, each burst containing 4 pulses at 100 Hz) and fEPSP slope is normalized to 20 minutes baseline. Insets: representative traces averaged from the baseline (thick lines) or from the last 10 minutes of the recordings (thin lines). Histogram compares mean (±S.E.M) normalized fEPSP slope from the last 10 minutes of the recordings from <i>Tspan6</i> KO and control slices (<i>p</i> = 0.026, T-test). Between 10 and 14 slices were analyzed from 9 different mice per group. <b>(C)</b> Paired-pulse facilitation ratios evoked by stimulation of the Schaffer collateral fibers with different interstimulus intervals (50, 100, 200 and 400ms). Representative traces of the paired-pulse facilitation at 50ms interstimulus interval from WT and KO slices are shown in the right. 27 slices from 8 to 10 different mice were analyzed per group.</p

Generation of Tspan6 KO mice and Tspan6 expression in the brain.

<p><b>(A)</b> The <i>Tspan6</i> KO mouse was generated by insertion of a neomycin cassette in the exon 2 of the <i>Tspan6</i> gene. Right panel show a representative agarose gel electrophoresis with the PCR products amplified with specific primers (a, b and c, shown by arrows in the left panel). <b>(B)</b> RNA was extracted from <i>Tspan6</i> KO and WT animals. Primers were designed between exon 1 and 3 (WT-specific primers), and exon 4 and exon 5 (primers downstream insertion). <b>(C)</b> Real time semi-quantitative PCR shows no RNA amplification between exon 1 and 3 in <i>Tspan6</i> KO mice due to the insertion of the neomycin cassette. <b>(D)</b> RNA amplification downstream the insertion is reduced in <i>Tspan6</i> KO mice (0.35± 0.01 mean fold change compared to WT) suggesting RNA degradation. Histogram shows mean (±S.E.M) fold changes normalized against WT expression, using either WT-specific primers (C) or primers downstream the insertion (D). Two housekeeping genes (Actin and GAPDH) were used for the normalization of the expression. <b>(E)</b> Neuronal lysates from cortical primary cultures from <i>Tspan6</i> WT, heterozygous and KO mice show the absence of Tspan6 protein in the KO condition. <b>(F)</b> RNA scope shows expression of Tspan6 RNA in the pyramidal layer of the hippocampus and granule cells from the dentate gyrus. First panel is a general view of the hippocampus (scale bar = 100μm). Panels 1 to 5 show box section in higher magnification (scale bar = 10μm).White dots are Tspan6 RNA molecules, synaptophysin RNA is stained in red and DAPI in blue.</p