2 research outputs found

    Efficacy of irinotecan single drug treatment in children with refractory or recurrent hepatoblastoma--a phase II trial of the childhood liver tumour strategy group (SIOPEL).

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To assess the clinical activity of irinotecan as single drug in children with refractory or recurrent hepatoblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four cycles of irinotecan were administered (20mg/m(2)/day intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 21days) unless tumour progression occurred or resectability was achieved earlier. Tumour response was assessed according to modified SIOPEL and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. Main end-points were best overall response rate (RR), early progression rate (EPR) and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible patients (median age 58.0months; 19 boys) were enrolled in the study (11 relapses, 13 refractory diseases). Of the 23 evaluable patients six had an overall partial response, 11 stable disease and six progressive disease, of which four were early progression (RR: 26%, EPR: 17%). In eight patients the residual tumour could be completely resected; seven patients became tumour free. At last follow-up 12 patients were alive (six with no evidence of disease, six with disease). PFS at 1year was 24%. Patients with relapse had a higher RR than patients with refractory disease (46% versus 8%) and patients with isolated lung lesions showed a better response than patients with other tumour localisations (50% versus 13%). The main grade 3-4 toxicities, diarrhoea and neutropenia, occurred in half of the patients. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan has a significant anti-tumour activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed hepatoblastoma and therefore should be considered for the treatment of these patients. Exploration of the role of irinotecan in the initial treatment of hepatoblastoma is warranted. Copyright \ua9 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

    Fibrolamellar variant of hepatocellular carcinoma does not have a better survival than conventional hepatocellular carcinoma \u2013 Results and treatment recommendations from the Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group (SIOPEL) experience

    Get PDF
    Abstract Purpose Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC) and conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases in two consecutive paediatric HCC trials were analysed to compare outcome and derive treatment implications. Patients and methods Data of 24 FL-HCC (24% PRETEXT IV) and 38 HCC (42% PRETEXT IV) cases from SIOPEL-2 and -3 (1995-1998, 1998-2006) were analysed. Patients were treated according to SIOPEL-2 and -3 high-risk protocol (carboplatin + doxorubicin alternating with cisplatin; seven preoperative, three postoperative cycles) or with primary surgery followed by chemotherapy as indicated. Results Thirteen of 24 FL-HCC (54%) and 32/38 HCC (84%) were initially treated with chemotherapy. Eight FL-HCC (33%) and five HCC patients (13%) had primary surgery. Partial response was observed in 31% of FL-HCC versus 53% of HCC patients (p = 0.17). Complete resection was achieved in ten FL-HCC and seven HCC patients (p = 0.08). Three-year event free survival (EFS) was 22% for FL-HCC versus 28% for HCC. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different at 3 years follow up (42% for FL-HCC versus 33% for HCC, p = 0.24). EFS/OS Kaplan-Meier curves did not differ significantly, with median follow up of 43 (FL-HCC) and 60 (HCC) months. No significant correlation was found between potential prognostic factors and OS. In the entire cohort nine out of 23 (39%) patients with complete resection or orthotopic liver transplantation versus 34/39 (87%) without successful surgical treatment, died. Conclusions Long-term OS in FL-HCC and HCC is similar. With low response rates, complete resection remains the treatment of choice. \ua9 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
    corecore