Novel artificial eye service evaluation using patient reported outcome measures

Background This service evaluation explores patient reported outcomes from patients provided with high definition ocular prostheses (artificial eyes). Methods Validated patient questionnaires (FACE-Q, DAS24 and HADS) were utilised to evaluate patient experiences of their new ocular prosthesis. 10 patients were included in the service evaluation, which was conducted between December 2018 and September 2019. Descriptive analysis of the mean and 95% CI was undertaken for all questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for FACE-Q questionnaires. Correlations were significant when factor loading is at α > 0.4. Results A questionnaire response rate of 80% was achieved (n = 8). PCA analysis showed the number of variables tested could be reduced. Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) had very good to excellent internal consistency between variables with factor loading (α = 0.7–0.9). PC1 contained questionnaires 1–7, all of which were highly correlated. PC2 contained question number 8 with a factor loading of α = 0.8. This indicates good reliability, validity and responsiveness. Conclusions We hope to demonstrate the importance of service evaluations with respect to rapidly evolving technological advances in medical devices, pharmaceuticals and imaging modalities. Further feasibility and full clinical studies are required to confirm the positive results of the novel artificial eye service we have evaluated with respect to the traditional approach

A cross-over, randomised feasibility study of digitally printed versus hand-painted artificial eyes in adults: PERSONAL-EYE-S - a study protocol

ackground/objectives: Around 11,500 artificial eyes are required yearly for new and existing patients. Artificial eyes have been manufactured and hand-painted at the National Artificial Eye Service (NAES) since 1948, in conjunction with approximately 30 local artificial eye services throughout the country. With the current scale of demand, services are under significant pressure. Manufacturing delays as well as necessary repainting to obtain adequate colour matching, may severely impact a patient’s rehabilitation pathway to a normal home, social and work life. However, advances in technology mean alternatives are now possible. The aim of this study is to establish the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digitally printed artificial eyes compared to hand-painted eyes. Methods: A cross-over, randomised feasibility study evaluating a digitally-printed artificial eye with a hand-painted eye, in patients aged ≥18 years with a current artificial eye. Participants will be identified in clinic, via ophthalmology clinic databases and two charity websites. Qualitative interviews will be conducted in the later phases of the study and focus on opinions on trial procedures, the different artificial eyes, delivery times, and patient satisfaction. Discussion: Findings will inform the feasibility, and design, of a larger fully powered randomised controlled trial. The long-term aim is to create a more life-like artificial eye in order to improve patients’ initial rehabilitation pathway, long term quality of life, and service experience. This will allow the transition of research findings into benefit to patients locally in the short term and National Health Service wide in the medium to long term