Clinical follow-up rather than duplex surveillance after carotid endarterectomy

AbstractPurpose: The value of duplex surveillance and the significance of contralateral carotid disease after endarterectomy have been assessed.Methods: Three hundred five patients were observed prospectively after carotid endarterectomy for a median time of 36 months (range, 6 to 96 months), with duplex surveillance performed at 1 day; 1 week; 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; and then each year after endarterectomy.Results: Thirty patients (10%) had ipsilateral symptoms (13 strokes, 17 transient ischemic attacks [TIAs]) at a median time of 6 months (range, 0 to 60 months). Life table analysis demonstrated that ipsilateral stroke was equally common for patients who had ≥50% restenosis (3% at 36 months) and those who did not (6% at 36 months, p > 0.5). Twenty-three patients (8%) developed symptoms (stroke 5, TIA 14) attributable to the contralateral carotid artery at a median time of 9 months (range, 0 to 36 months) after endarterectomy. By life table analysis, 40% of patients with 70% to 99%, 6% with 50% to 69%, 1% with <50% contralateral internal carotid stenosis, and 5% with contralateral carotid occlusion at the time of endarterectomy had a contralateral TIA in the 36 months after endarterectomy ( p < 0.01). However, contralateral stroke was not significantly more common for patients with severe contralateral internal carotid stenosis demonstrated at the time of endarterectomy (<50% stenosis, 0%; 50% to 69%, 3%; 70% to 99%, 7%; occlusion, 6% stroke rate at 36 months). Seven of the 32 patients who developed progression of contralateral disease had a TIA, compared with 11 of 227 patients who did not develop progression of contralateral disease ( p < 0.01). None of the 12 patients who progressed from a <70% to a 70% to 99% contralateral stenosis had a stroke.Conclusions: After carotid endarterectomy restenosis is rarely associated with symptoms; contralateral stroke is rare and is not associated with progressive internal carotid artery disease suitable for endarterectomy. This study has shown no benefit from long-term duplex surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. Selective clinical follow-up of patients who have high-grade contralateral stenoses would appear more appropriate. (J Vasc Surg 1997;25:55-63.

A design thinking approach to evaluating interprofessional education

The complex challenge of evaluating the impact of interprofessional education (IPE) on patient and community health outcomes is well documented. Recently, at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study in the United States, leaders in health professions education met to help generate a direction for future IPE evaluation research. Participants followed the stages of design thinking, a process for human-centred problem solving, to reach consensus on recommendations. The group concluded that future studies should focus on measuring an intermediate step between learning activities and patient outcomes. Specifically, knowing how IPE-prepared students and preceptors influence the organisational culture of a clinical site as well as how the culture of clinical sites influences learners' attitudes about collaborative practice will demonstrate the value of educational interventions. With a mixed methods approach and an appreciation for context, researchers will be able to identify the factors that foster effective collaborative practice and, by extension, promote patient-centred care