Study on radiative decays of DsJ∗(2860)D^*_{sJ}(2860) and Ds1∗(2710)D^*_{s1}(2710) into DsD_s by means of LFQM

The observed resonance peak around 2.86 GeV has been carefully reexamined by the LHCb collaboration and it is found that under the peak there reside two states $D^*_{s1}(2860)$ and $D^*_{s3}(2860)$ which are considered as $1^3D_1(c\bar s)$ and $1^3D_3(c\bar s)$ with slightly different masses and total widths. Thus, the earlier assumption that the resonance $D^*_{s1}(2710)$ was a $1D$ state should not be right. We suggest to measure the partial widths of radiative decays of $D^*_{sJ}(2860)$ and $D^*_{s1}(2710)$ to confirm their quantum numbers. We would consider $D^*_{s1}(2710)$ as $2^3S_1$ or a pure $1^3D_1$ state, or their mixture and respectively calculate the corresponding branching ratios as well as those of $D^*_{sJ}(2860)$. The future precise measurement would provide us information to help identifying the structures of those resonances .Comment: 8 pages, 4 figures, 1 tabl

Chlorido{μ-2,6-bis­[(2-amino­eth­yl)imino­meth­yl]-4-chloro­phenolato}-μ-oxido-dicopper(II) trihydrate

In the title dinuclear complex, [Cu2(C14H20ClN4O)ClO]·3H2O, one CuII cation assumes a distorted square-planar coordination geometry and the other a distorted square-pyramidal coordination geometry. Both CuII cations are N,N′,O-chelated by one arm of the 2,6-bis­[(2-amino­eth­yl)imino­meth­yl]-4-chloro­phenolate anion, and one oxide anion bridges the two CuII cations, forming a dinuclear complex. One of the CuII cations is further coordinated by an Cl− anion in the apical direction. In the crystal, lattice water mol­ecules are linked with the complex mol­ecule via O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds while O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding occurs between lattice water mol­ecules , forming three-dimensional network structure