4 research outputs found

    Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A 52-week, randomized, single-blind, extension study

    No full text
    <p><b>Objectives:</b> The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term (64 weeks; 52-week extension of a 12-week study) baricitinib treatment in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> Patients (<i>N</i> = 145) with active RA were randomized to placebo, 1mg, 2mg, 4mg, or 8mg baricitinib for the first 12 weeks. During the 52-week extension period, patients on 4mg or 8mg baricitinib remained on the same dose and all other patients were re-randomized to 4mg or 8mg baricitinib. Most patients on 8mg baricitinib were switched to 4mg by week 64 (protocol amendment); data analysis was based on the treatment group at the beginning of the extension period.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Increases in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) observed during the first 12 weeks were maintained during the extension period, accompanied by improvements in ACR core components. At week 64, a large proportion of patients (>40%) had low disease activity. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate; herpes zoster was the most common reason (11/27 patients) for discontinuation.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The efficacy and safety profile of baricitinib was maintained during long-term treatment of Japanese patients with RA and background methotrexate therapy.</p> <p>Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01469013; Funding: Eli Lilly and Incyte</p

    Risk factors for recurrence in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer in Japan: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    The clinicopathological factors indicating risk of recurrence are used to guide the choice of perioperative therapy in patients with breast cancer. Although several risk factors for recurrence have been reported in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) early breast cancer in Japan, there has been no systematic review quantifying potential risk factors. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Japan Medical Abstract Society databases to identify risk factors for recurrence in HR+/HER2− early breast cancer in Japan. The primary outcome was relapse-free or disease-free survival (RFS/DFS), and the secondary outcomes were overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Searches identified 42 eligible publications. Meta-analyses identified lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.76 [95% confidence interval: 1.97–3.88]), large tumor size (1.67 [1.24–2.23]), high histological grade (1.50 [1.04–2.16]), and high nuclear grade (2.02 [1.61–2.54]) as risk factors for RFS/DFS. Lymph node metastasis (2.43 [1.28–4.63]), large tumor size (1.80 [1.24–2.62]), and high histological grade (2.02 [1.44–2.84]) were also risk factors for overall survival, and high progesterone status was a possible favorable prognostic factor for BCSS (0.20 [0.10–0.42]). Identified risk factors were consistent with the previous reports, and this study provides quantitative summary of risk factors for HR+/HER2– early breast cancer recurrence in Japan. (PROSPERO Registration ID, CRD42022338391.)</p

    Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Economic Outcomes of Patients Initiating Injectable Medications for Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: Results from a Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

    No full text
    <p></p><p><b>Article full text</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>The full text of this article can be found here<b>. </b><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13300-018-0407-3">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13300-018-0407-3</a></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p><br></p> <p><b>Provide enhanced content for this article</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your article then please contact <a href="http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/”mailto:[email protected]”"><b>[email protected]</b></a>.</p> <p><br></p> <p>The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:</p> <p><br></p> <p>• Slide decks</p> <p>• Videos and animations</p> <p>• Audio abstracts</p> <p>• Audio slides</p><br><p></p

    Determinants of Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A <i>post hoc</i> analysis of overall and Japanese results from phase 3 clinical trials

    No full text
    <p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess the determinants of Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) and Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) in overall and Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from two large randomized controlled trials.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b><i>Post hoc</i> analysis of overall and Japanese RA patients who had previous inadequate responses to methotrexate or who had no/minimal previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment. We examined correlations between PtGA/PhGA and tender joint count in 28 joints (TJC28), swollen joint count in 28 joints (SJC28), inflammatory markers, pain visual analog scale (VAS), and other patient-reported outcomes at baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Determinants of PtGA/PhGA were identified.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> In overall populations, pain VAS was the main determinant of PtGA, whereas TJC28 was the main determinant of PhGA in both studies. In Japanese populations, consistent with overall populations, pain VAS was the main determinant of PtGA in both studies; in contrast to overall populations, pain VAS and SJC28/TJC28 played an important role in PhGA.</p> <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Pain was the most important determinant of PtGA, whereas determinants of PhGA varied between populations/studies and were mostly explained by pain/joint counts. Physicians should be aware of patients’ perceptions of disease activity when performing assessments/prescribing treatments.</p
    corecore