15 research outputs found

    Suitable areas for <i>Diabrotica virgifera virgifera</i> and value of assets.

    No full text
    <p>A: Area where the ecoclimatic index (EI) is above zero, B: Growth index (GI) (source for A and B: Kriticos et al. 2012), C: Percentage of area covered by grain and forage maize, and D: Value of grain and forage maize in euros per km<sup>2</sup> (source for C and D: McGill University 2011).</p

    Frequency distribution of the potential economic impact of pest invasion in three scenarios of model A in a case study based on <i>Diabrotica virgifera virgifera</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The potential economic impact is quantified by accumulating the asset value in invaded cells in 2010. These three figures correspond to (A) best case scenario, (B) worst case scenario (C) random case scenario. Spread model A is based on logistic increase (<i>r</i> = 0.33 yr<sup>−1</sup>) in the number of invaded cells on the map.</p

    Sensitivity analysis: effect of parameter changes in models C and D on the total population.

    No full text
    <p>The population size (y-axis) is given as a multiple of the population size in the base line scenario (3.2×10<sup>10</sup> in model C and 1.6×10<sup>12</sup> in model D). The total population represents the total number of insects in the area of potential establishment.</p

    Perturbation of invaded area with time for each model.

    No full text
    <p>A value of zero means that the scaled area does not change with a combination of parameters +/−10%. (*) ND means that the value is not defined because the invaded area for the baseline value is 0. (¤) Since a change in the parameter values of model D has negligible effects on the invaded area at time t  = 18 yrs (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0043366#pone-0043366-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>), it was not possible to define worst and best cases associated with this variable, and the sensitivity was set to 0.</p
    corecore