Cardiac Electrophysiological Effects of Light-Activated Chloride Channels

During the last decade, optogenetics has emerged as a paradigm-shifting technique to monitor and steer the behavior of specific cell types in excitable tissues, including the heart. Activation of cation-conducting channelrhodopsins (ChR) leads to membrane depolarization, allowing one to effectively trigger action potentials (AP) in cardiomyocytes. In contrast, the quest for optogenetic tools for hyperpolarization-induced inhibition of AP generation has remained challenging. The green-light activated ChR from Guillardia theta (GtACR1) mediates Cl−-driven photocurrents that have been shown to silence AP generation in different types of neurons. It has been suggested, therefore, to be a suitable tool for inhibition of cardiomyocyte activity. Using single-cell electrophysiological recordings and contraction tracking, as well as intracellular microelectrode recordings and in vivo optical recordings of whole hearts, we find that GtACR1 activation by prolonged illumination arrests cardiac cells in a depolarized state, thus inhibiting re-excitation. In line with this, GtACR1 activation by transient light pulses elicits AP in rabbit isolated cardiomyocytes and in spontaneously beating intact hearts of zebrafish. Our results show that GtACR1 inhibition of AP generation is caused by cell depolarization. While this does not address the need for optogenetic silencing through physiological means (i.e., hyperpolarization), GtACR1 is a potentially attractive tool for activating cardiomyocytes by transient light-induced depolarization

Mechano‐electrical interactions and heterogeneities in wild‐type and drug‐induced long QT syndrome rabbits

Electromechanical reciprocity – comprising electro-mechanical (EMC) and mechano-electric coupling (MEC) – provides cardiac adaptation to changing physiological demands. Understanding electromechanical reciprocity and its impact on function and heterogeneity in pathological conditions – such as (drug-induced) acquired long QT syndrome (aLQTS) – might lead to novel insights in arrhythmogenesis. Our aim is to investigate how electrical changes impact on mechanical function (EMC) and vice versa (MEC) under physiological conditions and in aLQTS. To measure regional differences in EMC and MEC in vivo, we used tissue phase mapping cardiac MRI and a 24-lead ECG vest in healthy (control) and IKr-blocker E-4031-induced aLQTS rabbit hearts. MEC was studied in vivo by acutely increasing cardiac preload, and ex vivo by using voltage optical mapping (OM) in beating hearts at different preloads. In aLQTS, electrical repolarization (heart rate corrected RT-interval, RTn370) was prolonged compared to control (P < 0.0001) with increased spatial and temporal RT heterogeneity (P < 0.01). Changing electrical function (in aLQTS) resulted in significantly reduced diastolic mechanical function and prolonged contraction duration (EMC), causing increased apico-basal mechanical heterogeneity. Increased preload acutely prolonged RTn370 in both control and aLQTS hearts (MEC). This effect was more pronounced in aLQTS (P < 0.0001). Additionally, regional RT-dispersion increased in aLQTS. Motion-correction allowed us to determine APD-prolongation in beating aLQTS hearts, but limited motion correction accuracy upon preload-changes prevented a clear analysis of MEC ex vivo. Mechano-induced RT-prolongation and increased heterogeneity were more pronounced in aLQTS than in healthy hearts. Acute MEC effects may play an additional role in LQT-related arrhythmogenesis, warranting further mechanistic investigations

Cardiac Conduction Velocity, Remodeling and Arrhythmogenesis

Cardiac electrophysiological disorders, in particular arrhythmias, are a key cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. There are two basic requirements for arrhythmogenesis: an underlying substrate and a trigger. Altered conduction velocity (CV) provides a key substrate for arrhythmogenesis, with slowed CV increasing the probability of re-entrant arrhythmias by reducing the length scale over which re-entry can occur. In this review, we examine methods to measure cardiac CV in vivo and ex vivo, discuss underlying determinants of CV, and address how pathological variations alter CV, potentially increasing arrhythmogenic risk. Finally, we will highlight future directions both for methodologies to measure CV and for possible treatments to restore normal CV