Connection of HaloTag to Env with the addition of the intervening second MSD.

<p>(A) Upper panel: Design of the Env-TM11D-Halo construct. A CMV promoter drives the expression of the tethered construct in all expression vectors. The 21 aa MSD of TM11D was added to the C terminal of gp41 as an MSD2 to help flipping out the HaloTag. Lower panel: Design of the Env-Halo construct, the control tethered construct without the MSD2 of TM11D. The expected membrane topology of the expressed protein with each construct is depicted schematically on the right. ED: ectodomain of gp41, MSD: membrane-spanning domain of gp41, CT: cytoplasmic tail of gp41. The sequences for Env corresponding to HXB2 or JRFL were used. (B) Confocal microscope analysis of tethered HaloTag in transfected 293FT cells stained with membrane-permeable (TMR, red color) or impermeable (AF488, green color) ligands. The transfected DNA is indicated: Mock, control DNA transfection; HXB2-Halo, Halo directly connects with gp41 (without the MSD of TM11D); HXB2-TM11D-Halo, a construct with the MSD of TM11D added between Env and Halo. Scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Effect of Halo ligands on the fusogenicity of HaloTag attached Env by DSP assay. Halo TMR and AF488 ligands were used to label the HXB2-TM11D-Halo fusion protein. The effect on the fusion activity was measured by DSP assay, which measures pore formation during cell-cell fusion by split <i>Renilla luciferase</i> (RL) reporter proteins. DSP activities for the ligand-labeled Env were compared with the HXB2-TM11D-Halo and non-tethered HXB2 Env protein without labeling (only add DMEM culture medium, and the value of HXB2-TM11D-Halo was set at 100%). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of triplicate experiments. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used to determine the statistical significance of the measured variables for each differently labeled (open column) and the non-labeled (solid column). ns = nonsignificant.</p

Effect of tethered neutralizing antibodies evaluated by syncytia formation and DSP assay.

<p>(A) Immunoblotting analysis of tethered fusion protein expression in 293FT cells with anti-gp120 (upper panel), anti-Flag (middle panel) or Chessie 8 anti-gp41 antibodies (lower panel). The expression vector used is indicated above the lane and the position of different fusion proteins is shown to the right. The anti-gp120 antibody detected the precursor form of tethered proteins and processed gp120 band; the anti-Flag antibody detected the tethered precursor and processed gp41-TM11D-scFv band; and the Chessie 8 anti-gp41antibody detected the processed gp41 (including gp41-TM11D-Halo and gp41-TM11D-scFv) bands. (B) The MFI of different constructs determined by flow cytometry. HaloTag Alexa Fluor 488 ligand was used to stain proteins expressed on the cell surface of 293FT cells transfected with different tethered constructs. The Tac-Halo vector (Halo is expressed in the cytoplasm) was used as a negative control for surface staining. Data was acquired with a BD FACSCalibur system and at least 12,000 events were collected and analyzed using FlowJo software. The MFI of HXB2-TM11D-Halo was set at 100%. Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of triplicate experiments. Student’s <i>t</i> test was used for the statistical analysis of the measured variables between individual construct (open column) and control (solid column). Significance was reported with p<0.05(*). ns = nonsignificant. (C) Fusion activity measured by DSP assay. The relative fusion activity was measured by DSP assay. DSP activities for each construct were compared with that of Env tethered with TM11D-MSD and HaloTag (HXB2-TM11D-Halo was set at 100%). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of triplicate experiments. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used to determine the statistical significance of the measured variables for each construct (open column) and control (solid column). Statistical significance was indicated when p<0.05(*), p<0.001 (***). ns = nonsignificant. (D) Normalization of DSP activity with surface expression level of Env. The DSP activities of each tethered construct shown in panel C were normalized by respective surface expression level defined by MFI measured by flow cytometry shown in panel B. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used to determine the statistical significance of the calculated variables for each construct (open column) and HXB2-TM11D-13H11 (solid grey column). Statistical significance was indicated when p<0.001 (***).</p

Mutations in the CDR3 region of tethered neutralizing scFvs recover fusion activity.

<p>(A) B12 and 2F5 CDR H3 loop mutants are listed. Left panel, mutations introduced into the tip of b12 CDR H3 (mutated amino acids are shown in red). The CDR H3 of b12 contains a number of residues important for gp120 binding. These residues are designated D100_A, D100_B. M100_J (Kabat numbering). Right panel, mutations introduced in the tip of the 2F5 CDR H3 region (mutated amino acids are shown in blue). The CDR H3 of 2F5 contains a patch of hydrophobic residues affecting its neutralizing activity, including residues L100_A, F100_B, V100_D, and I100_F (Kabat numbering). (B) DSP assay with tethered scFv mutants. DSP activities for each mutant scFv construct are shown after normalization to that of the HXB2-TM11D-13H11construct (the activity of 13H11 was set at 100%). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of triplicate experiments. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used for statistical analysis between each construct (open column) and control (solid column). Statistical significance was indicated when p<0.01 (**). ns = nonsignificant. (C) Syncytia formation assay was performed at the indicated time after the transfection of scFv mutants. The relative fusion activity of mutant constructs was quantified using a fusion index. Fusion activities for each mutant plasmid are shown after normalization to that of the tethered HXB2-TM11D-13H11 expression construct (fusion activity of tethered 13H11 24 h after transfection was set at 100%). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of observing five fields. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used for statistical analysis between each construct (open column) and control (solid column). Statistical significance was indicated when p<0.05 (*), p<0.01 (**) or p<0.001 (***). ns = nonsignificant.</p

Flow cytometry analysis of Env-expressing cells labeled with Halo ligands or anti-Env monoclonal antibody.

<p>(A–C) Flow cytometry analysis of Env expression level using different staining strategies. 293FT cells were transfected with expression vectors for tethered Env (HXB2-TM11D-Halo, red line; JRFL-TM11D-Halo, blue line), untethered Env (HXB2-WT, red dashed line; JRFL-WT, blue dashed line), or Mock DNA (grey shade). Cells were stained with membrane-impermeable HaloTag AF488 ligand (A), membrane-permeable HaloTag Oregon Green ligand (C) and anti-Env V3 antibody V3-G2-25 (B). Histograms are representative results from three independent experiments. (D) Positive staining rate of HaloTag labeling and anti-Env antibody immunolabeling of cells transfected with HXB2-TM11D-Halo (solid red bar), HXB2-WT (red shade bar), JRFL-TM11D-Halo (solid blue bar), JRFL-WT (blue shade bar) or Mock (solid gray bar). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results from three independent experiments.</p

Measurement of fusion inhibition of nested serial C-terminal deletion mutants of C34 by syncytia formation and DSP assay.

<p>(A) Syncytia formation assay in transfected 293CD4 cells. 293CD4 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs (HXB2-TM11D-C24, C26, C28, C30, C32, C34, and HXB2-TM11D-Halo). Relative fusion activity was quantified using a fusion index. Fusion activities for each plasmid are shown after normalization to that of the HXB2-TM11D-Halo construct (set at 100%). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of five fields. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used to determine the statistical significance of the measured variables for each construct (open column) and control (solid column). Statistical significance was indicated when p<0.001 (***). (B) Fusion activity measured by DSP assay. The relative fusion activity was measured by DSP assay. DSP activities for each construct were compared with that of the HXB2-TM11D-Halo construct (set at 100%). Error bars represent standard deviations of the results of triplicate experiments. Student’s <i>t</i>-test was used to determine the statistical significance of the measured variables for each construct (open column) and control (solid column). Statistical significance was indicated when p<0.01 (**) or p<0.001 (***). (C) Amino acid sequence of all C-terminal deletion mutants of C34 are listed.</p

MOESM1 of Six-helix bundle completion in the distal C-terminal heptad repeat region of gp41 is required for efficient human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Interaction of the C34 (647+A) peptide with N36. A. CD spectrographic analysis of the complexes formed between N36 and C34 or its mutant C34 (647+A). Left panel, the secondary structure of complexes formed by C34 and N36 (dark blue) or C34 (647+A) and N36 (orange). Right panel, the stability of complexes formed by C34 with N36 (dark gray) and its mutants (light gray), as measured by thermal denaturation analysis