2 research outputs found
Osteogenesis imperfecta - pamidronate treatment in Split Clinical Hospital Centre
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) ili bolest krhkih kostiju je kliniÄki, biokemijski i genski heterogena bolest veziva. Glavna osobina bolesti su lomljive i osteoporotiÄne kosti. Indikacija za poÄetak lijeÄenja postavlja se u djece nakon dva koÅ”tana loma. Od 2002.-2010. godine u KBC Split praÄeno je i lijeÄeno 7 djevojÄica i 6
djeÄaka u kojih je temeljem kliniÄke slike postavljena dijagnoza OI. U osmero djece OI tip I, u dvoje tip III, i u po jednomu djetetu tip V, VI i VII. U svrhu dijagnosticiranja bolesti, te tijekom i nakon provedenoga lijeÄenja praÄene su vrijednosti mineralne gustoÄe kostiju. Osmero je djece lijeÄeno intravenskom primjenom pamidronata. LijeÄenje je poboljÅ”alo mineralnu gustoÄu kostiju, Å”to je doprinijelo prestanku lomova kostiju u Å”estero lijeÄene djece. Svim oboljelim osobama preporuÄeno je i uzimanje hrane bogate
kalcijem i vitaminima. Fizikalnu terapiju koristilo je 10-ero djece. KirurÅ”ki zahvati zbog ispravljanja deformiteta provedeni su u troje djece. ZakljuÄno, lijeÄenje pamidronatom dokinulo je pojavu prijeloma kostiju i smanjenje bolova u kostima u sve lijeÄene djece, uz istovremeno poveÄanje vrijednosti mineralne gustoÄe kostiju, a bez nuspojava uzrokovanih uzimanjem lijeka. U lijeÄenju OI od iznimne je važnosti multidisciplinarni pristup oboljelom djetetu, uz suradnju pedijatra ā genetiÄara s djeÄjim kirurgom, specijalistom
fizikalne medicine i rehabilitacije, i ostalim specijalistima. U KBC-u Split se osobita pozornost poklanja praÄenju djece, edukaciji djeteta i roditelja o naravi bolesti, te adekvatnoj rehabilitaciji nakon prijeloma.Osteogenesis imperfecta or brittle bone disease is a clinical, biochemical and genetical heterogeneous disorder of the connective tissue. Fragile and osteoporotic bones are its main feature. From 2002-2010 seven girls and six boys were treated at CHC Split. Based on clinical symptoms, they all had OI, eight of them had type I, two type III and the rest type V, VI and VII respectively. Eight of them were treated with intravenous application of pamidronate. This treatment increased bone density and reduced the incidence of fractures. To all of them we strongly recommended food rich in calcium and vitamins. Ten children undertook physical therapy and three had surgical procedures to correct their deformities. Pamidronate treatment abolished the occurrence of bone fractures and reduced pain in all treated children, along with the increase of bone mineral density, but without side effects caused by the drugs. In this treatment of OI, a multidisciplinary approach is
crucial. The cooperation of pediatricians ā geneticists with children\u27s surgeons, specialists in physical medicine and rehabilitation, and other specialists is very important. At CHC Split, special attention is needed for monitoring and educating children and parents on the nature of the disease and adequate rehabilitation after fracture
Point prevalence of significant nutritional risk among cancer patients in Croatia ā research study of the Section of young oncologists, Croatian society for medical oncology of Croatian medical association
Cilj istraživanja: Utvrditi trenutaÄnu prevalenciju znatnoga nutritivnog rizika meÄu onkoloÅ”kim bolesnicima u Republici Hrvatskoj. Ispitanici i metode: Ova presjeÄna studija ugniježÄena je u prospektivnu kohortnu studiju Sekcije mladih onkologa HDIO-a HLZ-a, koja je provedena u Hrvatskoj tijekom 2017. godine na susljednom uzorku onkoloÅ”kih bolesnika biranome prema redoslijedu dolaska na lijeÄenje. Nutritivni probir proveli smo uporabom upitnika za procjenu nutritivnog rizika NRS-2002. Prema njemu, bolesnik se smatra nutritivno ugroženim ako je rezultat ā„ 3. Rezultati: U istraživanje je ukljuÄeno 275 bolesnika, medijana (interkvartilnog raspona) dobi od 61 godine (51 ā 68), meÄu kojima je bila 161 žena (58,5%). Bolesnici su lijeÄeni u jedanaest onkoloÅ”kih centara u Hrvatskoj. U 60 bolesnika (21,8%; 95%-tni CI 17,1 ā 27,2%) utvrÄen je znatan nutritivni rizik (NRS-2002 ā„ 3) koji indicira potrebu za nutritivnom intervencijom. Bilo kakvu nepovoljnu promjenu tijekom 30 dana prije ukljuÄivanja, dakle, gubitak tjelesne mase ili smanjen unos hrane, primijetilo je 127 (46,2%) sudionika. ZakljuÄak: NaÅ”e istraživanje potvrdilo je da znatan broj onkoloÅ”kih bolesnika u Hrvatskoj ima neki stupanj nutritivnog rizika te da je u viÅ”e od Äetvrtine potrebna nutritivna intervencija. Nutritivni probir prvi je korak u dugoroÄnoj kontroli komplikacija vezanih uz promijenjen
unos hrane i nutritivni rizik, kao i pri poboljŔanju kvalitete života onkoloŔkih bolesnika te prognoze ishoda bolesti pa bi ga, s obzirom na prikazane rezultate, trebalo rutinski provoditi.Objective of the Study: To determine the point prevalence of significant nutritional risk among cancer patients in Croatia. Subjects and Methods: This cross-sectional study was nested in the prospective cohort study of
the Section of Young Oncologists of the Croatian Society for Medical Oncology, Croatian Medical Association, conducted in Croatia during 2017 on the consecutive sample of cancer patients selected by the order of their arrival to the exam.Nutritional screening was performed using the NRS-2002, According to NRS-2002, the patient is considered to be at significant nutritional risk if the result is ā„3. Results: We included 275 patients treated at eleven cancer centers in Croatia. In 60 patients (21.8%, 95% CI 17.1% -27.2%) we identified the significant
nutritional risk (NRS-2002 ā„3) what indicates the need for the nutritional intervention. Any change during 30 days prior to screening, such as loss of body weight or reduced intake of food, was expressed by 127 (46.2%) participants. Conclusion: Our study has confirmed that a significant number of cancer patients in Croatia are in some degree at nutritional risk, and that more than one quarter need nutritional intervention. Nutritional screen poing is the first step in the long-term control of complications associated with altered food intake and nutritional risk, as well as in improving the overall quality of life of cancer patients and the prognosis of disease outcomes, so
regarding the presented results, it should be routinely implemented