Effectiveness of Ixekizumab in Elderly Patients for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results From a Multicenter, Retrospective Real-Life Study in the Lazio Region

Introduction: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study, enrolling elderly patients (>65 years old) treated with ixekizumab with a diagnosis of psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) during the period 2020 to 2023. Objectives: We sought to investigate the efficacy of ixekizumab in elderly patients in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Methods: We included 73 patients with psoriasis (32.9%), psoriatic arthritis (1.4%) and both of them (PsO-PsA 65.8%), attending the outpatient clinics of seven Italian referral center for psoriasis in Lazio region: Policlinico Umberto I Università Roma La Sapienza, Sant’Andrea Università di Roma La Sapienza, Polo Pontino Università Roma La Sapienza, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Campus Biomedico Roma, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata, and Policlinico Tor Vergata. We collected data related to the characteristics of the patients (age, sex, body mass index) and of the disease (age at onset, duration of psoriasis, previous treatments). The severity of psoriasis was measured with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at baseline and after 16, 24, 52, 104 and 156 weeks of treatment. Results: PASI90 was achieved by all the patients in week 16 and remained stable until the end of the study. PASI100 has been achieved by 55.1% of patients at weeks 16 and by 81.3% at week 104. A statistically significant difference has been highlighted between baseline and all the other time points (p<0.0001) for PASI score. A similar trend was observed for VAS score and DLQI score. Conclusions: Ixekizumab was effective and with a good safety profile in psoriatic patients over 65 years. No significant adverse events were reported

A linear forehead lesion caused by intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide and treated with hyaluronic acid filler: case report

Intralesional steroid injection is a treatment method frequently used to resolve a large number of orthopaedic, rheumatological, dermatological, neurological disorders. Although this treatment is very effective, it is not without possible side effects, both systemic and local, among which we can mention pain, bleeding, ulceration, atrophy, pigmentary changes, calcification, secondary infections, formation of granulomas, allergic reactions and, in very rare cases, the development of linear atrophy and hypopigmentation. Here, we present a case of frontal linear skin atrophy after intralesional steroid injection for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA) in a 29 year-old patient, successfully treated with a hyaluronic acid filler. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Efficacy and safety of Adalimumab in difficult-to-treat psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder, with a prevalence of 2-3% worldwide. Psoriatic lesions affecting scalp, nails, palms, and soles are considered difficult-to-treat and require specific management. When psoriasis involves these areas, it may be considered more severe even if the lesions are not extensive. Adalimumab (Humira®) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), administered via subcutaneous injection. It has already been used in the treatment of adults and children with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. In literature, few studies investigated its efficacy in difficult-to-treat areas, hence we conducted an observational prospective study of 24 weeks to assess its role in patients with difficult to treat psoriasis. We found out a significant improvement in nail and scalp psoriasis, whilst palmoplantar and genital psoriasis showed an improvement though not statistically significant. Therefore, adalimumab can be used in difficult-to-treat areas with great results, also allowing an improvement in the quality of life of affected patients, both adults and children. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Psoriasis in difficult to treat areas: treatment role in improving health-related quality of life and perception of the disease stigma

Background:When psoriasis affects scalp, nails, palms and soles, it is considered difficult to treat and causes severe impairment of life quality. Objective:We evaluated which difficult site most impacts on the patient's quality of life and how quality of life changes during treatment. Methods:We conducted a prospective observational study in patients receiving adalimumab over a 24 weeks period, through assessment at weeks 0, 4 and 24 using PASI, PAIN VAS, ITCH VAS, DLQI, NAPSI, PSSI. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between the various measurements on the basis of three different deltas (between T0 and T24, between T0 and T4, between T0 and average between T4 and T24) Results:The correlation matrix between T0 and T24 shows a significant correlation between delta PASI and delta ITCH and delta ITCH and delta DLQI and a significant correlation between ITCH delta and DLQI delta and a correlation close to significance between DLQI and NAPSI. Conclusion:We identified itching as a mediator between the cutaneous extension of psoriasis and the impact on quality of life. We also documented the predominant role of nail psoriasis in defining the impact on the quality of life of the psoriatic patient

Real-life 9-year experience with adalimumab in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: results of a single-centre, retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies in daily practice are an essential complement to pivotal randomised controlled trials because their findings refer to larger and more diverse patient populations with common comorbidities, complex medical history, concomitant medications and longer follow-up periods. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of the anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody, adalimumab, in patients with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) referring to an Italian dermatological centre. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective real-world investigation with an observation period of up to 9 years. RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 316 patients (117 with PsO and 199 with PsA) treated with adalimumab and followed for up to 9 years. Safety and efficacy of adalimumab were consistent with those described in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and other observational studies. A rapid and sustained improvement of skin lesions (evaluated as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 response rates) was observed in the majority of patients, including those with body mass index (BMI) >30 and with prior experience of biologic therapies (including other anti-TNFs). The safety profile of adalimumab was confirmed also in elderly patients (>65 years). CONCLUSION: Our real-life experience shows that the long-term treatment with adalimumab is effective and well tolerated in psoriatic patients, including overweight/obese, elderly and anti-TNF-experienced subjects