Post-Synthetic Defucosylation of AGP by <i>Aspergillus nidulans</i> α-1,2-Fucosidase Expressed in <i>Arabidopsis</i> Apoplast Induces Compensatory Upregulation of α-1,2-Fucosyltransferases - Fig 1

<p>(A) The expression cassette of the vector developed for Arabidopsis transformation. Abbreviations: CaMV 35S –Tetramer of Cauliflower Mosaic virus 35S RNA Promoter, YFP, yellow fluorescent protein coding sequence. (B) PCR analysis of genomic DNA from transgenic Arabidopsis lines transformed with microbial <i>A</i>.<i>nidulans</i> α-fucosidase expression cassette and wild type plants. Herbicide resistant lines were confirmed to harbor the full construct using four pairs of primers (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0159757#pone.0159757.s003" target="_blank">S1 Table</a> for sequences). Lane 1—amplification of <i>AnF</i> genes from corresponding transgenic lines; Lane 5—amplification of the same genes from <i>Col</i>-0 wild type plant; Lane 2—amplification of hybrid fragment containing <i>AnF</i> gene linked to the <i>YFP</i> from mutant lines; Lane 6—amplification of the <i>AnF</i>-<i>YFP</i> fragment from <i>Col</i>-0 wild type plant; Lane 3—amplification of <i>YFP</i> gene from the AnF line; Lane 7 –amplification of <i>YFP</i> from <i>Col-0</i> wild type plant; Lane 4—amplification of <i>A</i>. <i>thaliana ACTIN</i>-2 gene fragment from AnF line, and Lane 8 –amplification of <i>ACTIN</i>-2 from <i>Col</i>-0 wild type plant. Analysis was done for three independent transgenic lines for each construction; picture shows results of PCR for single plant of each mutant line. (C) Western blot analysis of total proteins from apoplast of Arabidopsis AnF transgenic and wild type plants. The corresponding microbial fucosidase fused with YFP (116kDa) were found in transgenic lines and not in <i>Col</i>-0 control plants. Blots were produced using GFP monoclonal antibodies (1:5000 dilution).</p

Real-time qPCR analysis of <i>FUT</i> gene expression in transgenic lines AnF and wild type plants.

<p>Relative expression levels were calculated as comparison to the <i>ACTIN-2</i> reference gene, whose expression was not affected. 2^−ΔΔCt method was used for determining difference between transcripts copy numbers in wild-type and transgenic plants. * Differences between transgenic lines and <i>Col</i>-0 are significant. Analysis of <i>AtFUT</i> genes expression level were done separately for: (A) Stems. (B) Leaves. (C) Roots.</p

Monosaccharide composition (mol%).

<p>(A) Monosaccharide composition of total cell walls extracted from the whole 4-week-old transgenic plants expressing AnF and wild type Col-0 plants. (B) Monosaccharide composition of cell wall fractions after pectin being removed. Analysis was done using stem, leaf and root tissues of 4-week-old transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing AnF and wild type Col-0 plants. (C) Neutral monosaccharide composition (mol%) of AGP glycan. (D) Monosaccharide composition of cell wall fraction remaining after AGP removal. Analysis was done using stem, leaf, and root tissues of 4-week-old Arabidopsis plants. * Differences between transgenic lines and <i>Col</i>-0 are significant (n = 3, p<0.05).</p

Light and confocal microscopy images of different organs of 3-week old transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing AnF.

<p>(A) Light microscopy image of AnF expressing plant root cells. (B) Localization of AnF protein fused with YFP in the root cells. (C) Light microscopy image of AnF expressing plant stem cells. (D) Localization of AnF protein fused with YFP in the stem cells. Bars = 0.2 mm.</p