Assessing the contributions of visual and motor experience to action prediction skill in baseball

Both visual and motor experiences impact action prediction, yet through potentially different mechanisms. Having physical experience with an action is thought to engage motor simulative processes, potentially activating the watcher’s motor system in an effector specific manner, aiding prediction. Leveraging baseball’s unique specialization demands, we assessed pitch discrimination in athletes with predominantly visual experience (hitters, n = 41) and motor experience (pitchers, n = 42; 9 left-handed). Videos of right-handed (RH) pitches, cut at or after ball release, of three different pitches, were used to assess pitch prediction accuracy. Two versions of each video clip were shown; the original RH clips were “flipped” to make the pitcher appear to throw left-handed (LH). Pitchers and hitters had reliable responses and showed high accuracy (~70%) and discriminability. Pitchers were more discriminatory than hitters (d prime) when contrasting two pitch types with the same initial trajectory and speed, but different postural cues (curveballs and changeups). Compared to hitters, pitchers also showed a trend for higher accuracy in “release-point” conditions, where only postural information was available. Accuracy was high on both left and right videos, but only LH pitchers showed a LH video advantage (although at release point, there were effector specific advantages for LH and RH pitchers). Because pitchers did not differ in accuracy from hitters, despite a lack of visual experience, this suggests that their motor experience aided predictions. However, there was only partial support for a simulation explanation (based on effector specificity).Education, Faculty ofKinesiology, School ofGraduat

Right and left-handed pitch-type recognition among hitters and pitchers in baseball: Testing the motor simulation hypothesis

Both visual and motor experiences impact action prediction, yet through potentially different mechanisms. Having physical experience with an action is thought to engage motor simulative processes, potentially activating the watcher’s motor system in an effector-specific manner, aiding prediction. Leveraging baseball’s unique specialization demands, we assessed pitch discrimination in athletes with predominantly visual experience seeing pitches (hitters, n = 41; 7 = left-handed hitters) and motor experience producing pitches (pitchers, n = 42; 9 = left-handed). Videos of right-handed (RH) pitches, with temporal occlusion applied at or after ball release, of three different pitches, were used to assess pitch prediction accuracy. Two versions of each video clip were shown; the original RH clips were “flipped” to make the pitcher appear to throw left-handed (LH). Pitchers and hitters had reliable responses and showed high accuracy (~70%) and discriminability. Pitchers were more discriminatory than hitters when contrasting two pitch types with the same initial trajectory and speed, but different postural cues (curveballs and changeups; d’ pitchers = 2.18, hitters = 1.88). Although there was the predicted interaction for the pitchers when comparing LH and RH pitchers watching LH and RH videos (p<.05), only LH pitchers showed a trend for a same-side, LH video advantage (p=.06). Because pitchers did not differ in accuracy from hitters, despite a lack of visual experience seeing and responding, this suggests that their motor experience aided predictions. However, there was only partial support for a simulation explanation based on effector specificity (due to absence of any differences in RH pitchers)

Assessing the validity and reliability of a baseball pitch discrimination online task

Baseball action prediction data and dynamic visual acuity data for an online tas