32 research outputs found

    Id-1 and Id-2 are markers for metastasis and prognosis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Id protein family consists of four members namely Id-1 to Id-4. Different from other basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors, they lack the DNA binding domain. Id proteins have been shown to be dysregulated in many different cancer types and their prognostic value has also been demonstrated. Recently, Id-1 has been shown to be upregulated in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the prognostic implications of Id proteins in ESCC have not been reported. We examined the expression of the Id proteins in ESCC cell lines and clinical ESCC specimens and found that Id protein expressions were dysregulated in both the ESCC cell lines and specimens. By correlating the expression levels of Id proteins and the clinicopathological data of our patient cohort, we found that M1 stage tumours had significantly higher nuclear Id-1 expression (P=0.012) while high nuclear Id-1 expression could predict development of distant metastasis within 1 year of oesophagectomy (P=0.005). In addition, high levels of Id-2 expression in both cytoplasmic and nuclear regions predicted longer patient survival (P=0.041). Multivariate analysis showed that high-level expression of Id-2 in both cytoplasmic and nuclear regions and lower level of nuclear Id-1 expression were independent favourable predictors of survival in our ESCC patients. Our results suggest that Id-1 may promote distant metastasis in ESCC, and both Id-1 and Id-2 may be used for prognostication for ESCC patients

    Promoter methylation-associated loss of ID4 expression is a marker of tumour recurrence in human breast cancer

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Inhibitor of DNA binding/Inhibitor of differentiation 4 (<it>ID4</it>) is a critical factor for cell proliferation and differentiation in normal vertebrate development. <it>ID4</it> has regulative functions for differentiation and growth of the developing brain. The role of <it>ID1</it>, <it>ID2</it> and <it>ID3</it> are expected to be oncogenic due to their overexpression in pancreatic cancer and colorectal adenocarcinomas, respectively. Aside from these findings, loss of <it>ID3</it> expression was demonstrated in ovarian cancer. The aim of the present study was to reveal the factual role of <it>ID4</it> in carcinogenesis in more detail, since its role for the pathogenesis of human breast cancer has been discussed controversially, assigning both oncogenic and tumour suppressive functions. </p> <p>Methods</p> <p><it>ID4</it> promoter methylation, <it>ID4</it> mRNA expression and <it>ID4</it> protein expression were analysed in primary human breast cancer specimens using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) (n=170), semiquantitative realtime RT-PCR (n=46) and immunhistochemistry (n=3), respectively. In order to demonstrate a functional association of <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation with its gene silencing, we performed DNA demethylation analysis with four human breast cell lines using MSP and semiquantitative realtime RT-PCR. In addition, we performed correlations of <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation with <it>ID4</it> mRNA and <it>ID4</it> protein expression in matched samples of breast tumour and corresponding normal tissue. We carried out statistical analyses in order to find correlations between <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation and clinicopathological parameters. </p> <p>Results</p> <p>Frequent <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation was observed in primary breast cancer samples (69%, 117/170). We found a tight correlation (P<0.0001) between <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation and loss of <it>ID4</it> expression in primary breast cancer 3 specimens. Demethylating treatment with breast cancer cell lines was associated with clear ID4 mRNA re-expression. Tumours with <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation showed distinct loss of <it>ID4</it> expression on both transcription and protein level. Interestingly, <it>ID4</it> promoter methylation was a factor for unfavourable recurrence-free survival (P=0.036) and increased risk for lymph node metastasis (P=0.030). </p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>ID4 is indeed a novel tumour suppressor gene in normal human breast tissue and is epigenetically silenced during cancer development, indicating increased risk for tumour relapse. Thus, <it>ID4</it> methylation status could serve as a prognostic biomarker in human breast cancer.</p

    Differential disruption of cell cycle pathways in small cell and non-small cell lung cancer

    Get PDF
    Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world, with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprising the two major cell types. Although these cell types can be distinguished readily at the histological level, knowledge of their underlying molecular differences is very limited. In this study, we compared 14 SCLC cell lines against 27 NSCLC cell lines using an integrated array comparative genomic hybridisation and gene expression profiling approach to identify subtype-specific disruptions. Using stringent criteria, we have identified 159 of the genes that are responsible for the different biology of these cell types. Sorting of these genes by their biological functions revealed the differential disruption of key components involved in cell cycle pathways. Our novel comparative combined genome and transcriptome analysis not only identified differentially altered genes, but also revealed that certain shared pathways are preferentially disrupted at different steps in these cell types. Small cell lung cancer exhibited increased expression of MRP5, activation of Wnt pathway inhibitors, and upregulation of p38 MAPK activating genes, while NSCLC showed downregulation of CDKN2A, and upregulation of MAPK9 and EGFR. This information suggests that cell cycle upregulation in SCLC and NSCLC occurs through drastically different mechanisms, highlighting the need for differential molecular target selection in the treatment of these cancers
    corecore