7 research outputs found

    Comparison of three nanoparticle deposition techniques potentially applicable to elemental mapping by nanoparticle-enhanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

    Get PDF
    In this study, we compared the applicability of three nanoparticle deposition techniques (spray coating, spark discharge nanoparticle generation, magnetron sputtering) towards elemental mapping by nanoparticle-enhanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (NE-LIBS). It was found that sputtering followed by a thermal treatment at 550 °C can provide a homogenous, practical and controllable way of NE-LIBS sample preparation with gold nanoparticles. The laser ablation properties of the created NP layer was also studied in detail and it was established that a 200 μm laser spot size is good compromise between the NE-LIBS signal enhancement and the spatial resolution required for mapping. A signal enhancement of about a factor of 10 with good repeatability (ca. 5 %RSD) in a line scanning demonstration was achieved on glass for Si detection. For samples that are fairly temperature and vacuum stable, this approach allows the signal enhancement to be used in mapping applications

    Crater formation by fast ions: comparison of experiment with Molecular Dynamics simulations

    Full text link
    An incident fast ion in the electronic stopping regime produces a track of excitations which can lead to particle ejection and cratering. Molecular Dynamics simulations of the evolution of the deposited energy were used to study the resulting crater morphology as a function of the excitation density in a cylindrical track for large angle of incidence with respect to the surface normal. Surprisingly, the overall behavior is shown to be similar to that seen in the experimental data for crater formation in polymers. However, the simulations give greater insight into the cratering process. The threshold for crater formation occurs when the excitation density approaches the cohesive energy density, and a crater rim is formed at about six times that energy density. The crater length scales roughly as the square root of the electronic stopping power, and the crater width and depth seem to saturate for the largest energy densities considered here. The number of ejected particles, the sputtering yield, is shown to be much smaller than simple estimates based on crater size unless the full crater morphology is considered. Therefore, crater size can not easily be used to estimate the sputtering yield.Comment: LaTeX, 7 pages, 5 EPS figures. For related figures/movies, see: http://dirac.ms.virginia.edu/~emb3t/craters/craters.html New version uploaded 5/16/01, with minor text changes + new figure
    corecore