Creating a Mass Spectral Reference Library for Oligosaccharides in Human Milk

We report the development and availability of a mass spectral reference library for oligosaccharides in human milk. This represents a new variety of spectral library that includes consensus spectra of compounds annotated through various data analysis methods, a concept that can be extended to other varieties of biological fluids. Oligosaccharides from the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1953, composed of human milk pooled from 100 breastfeeding mothers, were identified and characterized using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-ESI-MS/MS) and the NIST 17 Tandem MS Library. Consensus reference spectra were generated, incorporated into a searchable library, and matched using the newly developed hybrid search algorithm to elucidate unknown oligosaccharides. The NIST hybrid search program facilitates the structural assignment of complex oligosaccharides especially when reference standards are not commercially available. High accuracy mass measurement for precursor and product ions, as well as the relatively high MS/MS signal intensities of various oligosaccharide precursors with Fourier transform ion trap (FT-IT) and higher energy dissociation (HCD) fragmentation techniques, enabled the assignment of multiple free and underivatized fucosyllacto- and sialyllacto-oligosaccharide spectra. Neutral and sialylated isomeric oligosaccharides have distinct retention times, allowing the identification of 74 oligosaccharides in the reference material. This collection of newly characterized spectra based on a searchable, reference MS library of annotated oligosaccharides can be applied to analyze similar compounds in other types of milk or any biological fluid containing milk oligosaccharides

Creation of Libraries of Recurring Mass Spectra from Large Data Sets Assisted by a Dual-Column Workflow

An analytical methodology has been developed for extracting recurrent unidentified spectra (RUS) from large GC/MS data sets. Spectra were first extracted from original data files by the Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification System (AMDIS; Stein, S. E. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 10, 770–781) using settings designed to minimize spurious spectra, followed by searching the NIST library with all unidentified spectra. The spectra that could not be identified were then filtered to remove poorly deconvoluted data and clustered. The results were assumed to be unidentified components. This was tested by requiring each unidentified spectrum to be found in two chromatographic columns with slightly different stationary phases. This methodology has been applied to a large set of pediatric urine samples. A library of spectra and retention indices for derivatized urine components, both identified and recurrent unidentified, has been created and is available for download

The Hybrid Search: A Mass Spectral Library Search Method for Discovery of Modifications in Proteomics

We present a mass spectral library-based method to identify tandem mass spectra of peptides that contain unanticipated modifications and amino acid variants. We describe this as a “hybrid” method because it combines matching both ion <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> and mass losses. The mass loss is the difference between the mass of an ion peak and the mass of its precursor. This difference, termed DeltaMass, is used to shift the product ions in the library spectrum that contain the modification, thereby allowing library product ions that contain the unexpected modification to match the query spectrum. Clustered unidentified spectra from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) and Chinese hamster ovary cells were used to evaluate this method. The results demonstrate the ability of the hybrid method to identify unanticipated modifications, insertions, and deletions, which may include those due to an incomplete protein sequence database or to search settings that exclude the correct identification, in high-resolution tandem mass spectra without regard to their precursor mass. This has been made possible by indexing of the <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> value of each fragment ion and its difference in mass from its precursor ion

Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches

Spectral library searching (SLS) is an attractive alternative to sequence database searching (SDS) for peptide identification due to its speed, sensitivity, and ability to include any selected mass spectra. While decoy methods for SLS have been developed for low mass accuracy peptide spectral libraries, it is not clear that they are optimal or directly applicable to high mass accuracy spectra. Therefore, we report the development and validation of methods for high mass accuracy decoy libraries. Two types of decoy libraries were found to be suitable for this purpose. The first, referred to as Reverse, constructs spectra by reversing a library’s peptide sequences except for the C-terminal residue. The second, termed Random, randomly replaces all non-C-terminal residues and either retains the original C-terminal residue or replaces it based on the amino-acid frequency of the library’s C-terminus. In both cases the <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> values of fragment ions are shifted accordingly. Determination of FDR is performed in a manner equivalent to SDS, concatenating a library with its decoy prior to a search. The utility of Reverse and Random libraries for target-decoy SLS in estimating false-positives and FDRs was demonstrated using spectra derived from a recently published synthetic human proteome project (Zolg, D. P.; et al. <i>Nat. Methods</i> <b>2017</b>, 14<i>,</i> 259–262). For data sets from two large-scale label-free and iTRAQ experiments, these decoy building methods yielded highly similar score thresholds and spectral identifications at 1% FDR. The results were also found to be equivalent to those of using the decoy-free PeptideProphet algorithm. Using these new methods for FDR estimation, MSPepSearch, which is freely available search software, led to 18% more identifications at 1% FDR and 23% more at 0.1% FDR when compared with other widely used SDS engines coupled to postprocessing approaches such as Percolator. An application of these methods for FDR estimation for the recently reported “hybrid” library search (Burke, M. C.; et al. <i>J. Proteome Res.</i> <b>2017</b>, <i>16</i>, 1924–1935) method is also made. The application of decoy methods for high mass accuracy SLS permits the merging of these results with those of SDS, thereby increasing the assignment of more peptides, leading to deeper proteome coverage

Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches

Spectral library searching (SLS) is an attractive alternative to sequence database searching (SDS) for peptide identification due to its speed, sensitivity, and ability to include any selected mass spectra. While decoy methods for SLS have been developed for low mass accuracy peptide spectral libraries, it is not clear that they are optimal or directly applicable to high mass accuracy spectra. Therefore, we report the development and validation of methods for high mass accuracy decoy libraries. Two types of decoy libraries were found to be suitable for this purpose. The first, referred to as Reverse, constructs spectra by reversing a library’s peptide sequences except for the C-terminal residue. The second, termed Random, randomly replaces all non-C-terminal residues and either retains the original C-terminal residue or replaces it based on the amino-acid frequency of the library’s C-terminus. In both cases the <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> values of fragment ions are shifted accordingly. Determination of FDR is performed in a manner equivalent to SDS, concatenating a library with its decoy prior to a search. The utility of Reverse and Random libraries for target-decoy SLS in estimating false-positives and FDRs was demonstrated using spectra derived from a recently published synthetic human proteome project (Zolg, D. P.; et al. <i>Nat. Methods</i> <b>2017</b>, 14<i>,</i> 259–262). For data sets from two large-scale label-free and iTRAQ experiments, these decoy building methods yielded highly similar score thresholds and spectral identifications at 1% FDR. The results were also found to be equivalent to those of using the decoy-free PeptideProphet algorithm. Using these new methods for FDR estimation, MSPepSearch, which is freely available search software, led to 18% more identifications at 1% FDR and 23% more at 0.1% FDR when compared with other widely used SDS engines coupled to postprocessing approaches such as Percolator. An application of these methods for FDR estimation for the recently reported “hybrid” library search (Burke, M. C.; et al. <i>J. Proteome Res.</i> <b>2017</b>, <i>16</i>, 1924–1935) method is also made. The application of decoy methods for high mass accuracy SLS permits the merging of these results with those of SDS, thereby increasing the assignment of more peptides, leading to deeper proteome coverage

Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches

Spectral library searching (SLS) is an attractive alternative to sequence database searching (SDS) for peptide identification due to its speed, sensitivity, and ability to include any selected mass spectra. While decoy methods for SLS have been developed for low mass accuracy peptide spectral libraries, it is not clear that they are optimal or directly applicable to high mass accuracy spectra. Therefore, we report the development and validation of methods for high mass accuracy decoy libraries. Two types of decoy libraries were found to be suitable for this purpose. The first, referred to as Reverse, constructs spectra by reversing a library’s peptide sequences except for the C-terminal residue. The second, termed Random, randomly replaces all non-C-terminal residues and either retains the original C-terminal residue or replaces it based on the amino-acid frequency of the library’s C-terminus. In both cases the <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> values of fragment ions are shifted accordingly. Determination of FDR is performed in a manner equivalent to SDS, concatenating a library with its decoy prior to a search. The utility of Reverse and Random libraries for target-decoy SLS in estimating false-positives and FDRs was demonstrated using spectra derived from a recently published synthetic human proteome project (Zolg, D. P.; et al. <i>Nat. Methods</i> <b>2017</b>, 14<i>,</i> 259–262). For data sets from two large-scale label-free and iTRAQ experiments, these decoy building methods yielded highly similar score thresholds and spectral identifications at 1% FDR. The results were also found to be equivalent to those of using the decoy-free PeptideProphet algorithm. Using these new methods for FDR estimation, MSPepSearch, which is freely available search software, led to 18% more identifications at 1% FDR and 23% more at 0.1% FDR when compared with other widely used SDS engines coupled to postprocessing approaches such as Percolator. An application of these methods for FDR estimation for the recently reported “hybrid” library search (Burke, M. C.; et al. <i>J. Proteome Res.</i> <b>2017</b>, <i>16</i>, 1924–1935) method is also made. The application of decoy methods for high mass accuracy SLS permits the merging of these results with those of SDS, thereby increasing the assignment of more peptides, leading to deeper proteome coverage