19 research outputs found

    Distribution of occupations by village and all respondents, n = 292.

    No full text
    <p>Distribution of occupations by village and all respondents, n = 292.</p

    Map of Tanzania with expanded area central coast of Tanzania indicating position of coastal villages from North to South: A. Ununio, B. Kunduchi, and C. Buyuni.

    No full text
    <p>(Source <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/Tanzania.html" target="_blank">https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/Tanzania.html</a>).</p

    Ordinal regression model (logistic) fishers' responses to perception of rule-breaking for rules controlling fishing.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Retained explanatory variables fishers (n = 80). (b) Threshold coefficients: (log-likelihood: −89.85624, AIC: 189.7125, Condition number of Hessian: 1294.610).</p

    Mean values of demographic data, response variables and key socio-economic indicators by village (n = 299, TZS = Tanzanian Shilling, HH = Household, Env. = environmental).

    No full text
    <p>Mean values of demographic data, response variables and key socio-economic indicators by village (n = 299, TZS = Tanzanian Shilling, HH = Household, Env. = environmental).</p

    Rule awareness (n = 299), rules mentioned/described (n = 299) and respondent perceptions of rule-breaking (n = 222).

    No full text
    <p>Rule awareness (n = 299), rules mentioned/described (n = 299) and respondent perceptions of rule-breaking (n = 222).</p

    Distribution of individual response by village and all respondents for estimate of environmental health of the sea, n = 250.

    No full text
    <p>Distribution of individual response by village and all respondents for estimate of environmental health of the sea, n = 250.</p

    Ordinal regression model (logistic) all respondents' responses to perception of rule-breaking for rules controlling fishing.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Retained explanatory variables all respondents (n = 201). (b) Threshold coefficients: (log-likelihood: −241.1900, AIC: 494.3801, Condition number of Hessian: 2288.399).</p

    Factor weightings following Varimax Rotation, values indicate contribution of factors (if present) to overall Material Style of Life score, n = 299.

    No full text
    <p>Factor weightings following Varimax Rotation, values indicate contribution of factors (if present) to overall Material Style of Life score, n = 299.</p

    Estimated contribution (% ± SD) from Maximum Likelihood Analysis of different potential juvenile habitats to adult nearshore and offshore reef populations of three reef fish species, and large juvenile (>15 cm TL) <i>L. harak</i> in seagrass beds.

    No full text
    <p>Classification success is based on a quadratic discriminant function analysis using jack-knife classification to examine the success of assigning individuals to their known origin. Both analyses are based on δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>18</sup>O values combined. Because seagrass and mangrove habitat signatures did not differ for <i>L. lentjan</i>, they had to be combined for this analysis. CR  =  coral reef; SG  =  seagrass bed; MG  =  mangroves.</p

    Results of a one-way ANOVA on otolith δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>18</sup>O, respectively, of <i>Lethrinus harak</i>, <i>Lethrinus lentjan</i>, and <i>Lutjanus fulviflamma</i> for three potential juvenile habitats.

    No full text
    <p>Non-significant values (p>0.05), which indicate no differences among habitats, are indicated in bold. Due to non-significant post-hoc tests for otolith δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>18</sup>O of <i>L. lentjan</i> between mangrove and seagrass these two habitats had to be combined. CR  =  coral reef; SG  =  seagrass bed; MG  =  mangroves.</p
    corecore