1 research outputs found

    MOESM1 of 3-D dynamic rupture simulations of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake

    No full text
    Additional file 1. Text S1: Dynamic rupture propagation in cases with unfeasible parameters. Text S2: Effects of aseismic slip triggered by foreshock 1. Figure S1: Dynamic rupture propagation in the case with the free surface when is 100 MPa, is 50 MPa (case A), is 0.35 m, and is 1.2. Figure S2: Dynamic rupture propagation in the case with the free surface when is 100 MPa, is 50 MPa (case A), is 0.1 m, and is 0.8. Figure S3: Final slip distribution in cases C, D, and G. Figure S4: Observed and synthetic near-fault ground displacements at KMMH16 (KiK-net), 93048, and 93049 (deployed by the local government of Kumamoto prefecture) stations. Figure S5: Assumed slip distribution of the aseismic slip, ΔCFS due to the aseismic slip, and ΔCFS due to the combination of the aseismic slip and the foreshocks. Figure S6: Dynamic rupture propagation in case A2 with the free surface. The stress changes due to the aseismic slip and the foreshocks were taken into account in this simulation
    corecore