Management of horizontal duodenal perforation: a report of three cases and review of literature

Abstract Background Perforation of the horizontal duodenum is very rare due to the presence in retroperitoneal space. It depicts an unusual clinical picture and is difficult to diagnose, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The treatment strategies are usually varied and based on small series of cases, literature reviews, and expert opinions. Case presentation Here, we presented three cases of horizontal duodenal perforation in three different clinical processes. The first case, a 30-year-old male patient, presented with abdominal pain and hematemesis after experiencing a physical assault on the previous day. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed rupture of the horizontal duodenum. It was repaired by side-to-side duodenojejunostomy. Postoperatively, he had anastomotic leakage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and pulmonary failure and recovered after a long hospital stay. The second case, an 81-year-old female, had duodenal perforation with endoscopic coagulation of the bleeding diverticulum. Segmental resection of the duodenum and side-to-side duodenojejunostomy were performed. Postoperatively, there was slight anastomotic leakage, but surgical intervention was not needed. The third case, an 89-year-old female, was a patient with obstructive jaundice due to pancreas head carcinoma, who developed perforation of the horizontal duodenum during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). After unsuccessful conservative management, duodenojejunostomy at the perforated site and gastric bypass were performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusion Early suspicion and investigation is necessary for cases of abdominal injuries. CT scan is the investigation of choice. The management options should be based on the clinical condition of the patient, comorbidities, surgical expertise, existing guidelines, and available resources

Gene Regulation by Antitumor miR-204-5p in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Clinical Significance of Direct RACGAP1 Regulation

Previously, we established a microRNA (miRNA) expression signature in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tissues using RNA sequencing and found significantly reduced expression of miR-204-5p. Here, we aimed to investigate the functional significance of miR-204-5p and to identify miR-204-5p target genes involved in PDAC pathogenesis. Cancer cell migration and invasion were significantly inhibited by ectopic expression of miR-204-5p in PDAC cells. Comprehensive gene expression analyses and in silico database searches revealed 25 putative targets regulated by miR-204-5p in PDAC cells. Among these target genes, high expression levels of RACGAP1, DHRS9, AP1S3, FOXC1, PRP11, RHBDL2 and MUC4 were significant predictors of a poor prognosis of patients with PDAC. In this study, we focused on RACGAP1 (Rac guanosine triphosphatase-activating protein 1) because its expression was most significantly predictive of PDAC pathogenesis (overall survival rate: p = 0.0000548; disease-free survival rate: p = 0.0014). Overexpression of RACGAP1 was detected in PDAC clinical specimens, and its expression enhanced the migration and invasion of PDAC cells. Moreover, downstream genes affected by RACGAP1 (e.g., MMP28, CEP55, CDK1, ANLN and S100A14) are involved in PDAC pathogenesis. Our strategy to identify antitumor miRNAs and their target genes will help elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of PDAC

Additional file 1: of Pancreatic hamartoma: a case report and literature review

A literature review of the pancreatic hamartoma. (DOC 86 kb

MAPLE-PD trial (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 354 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background The mesenteric approach is an artery-first approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer, which starts with the dissection of connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery. The procedure aims for early confirmation of resectability by checking the surgical margin around the superior mesenteric artery first during the operation. It also aims to decrease intraoperative blood loss by early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and to increase R0 rate by complete clearance of the lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery and pancreatic head plexus II, the most favorable positive margin site for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, it aims to avoid the spread of cancer cells during operation (nontouch isolation technique). The MAPLE-PD (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy) trial investigates whether the mesenteric approach can prolong the survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with the conventional approach. Methods/design The MAPLE-PD trial is a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial that compares the surgical outcomes between the mesenteric and conventional approaches to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma scheduled to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy are randomized before operation to either a conventional approach (arm A) or a mesenteric approach (arm B). In arm A, the operation starts with Kocher’s maneuver. At the final step of the removal procedure, the connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery are dissected. In arm B, the operation starts with dissection of the connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery and ends with Kocher’s maneuver. In total, 354 patients from 15 Japanese high-volume centers will be randomized. The primary endpoint is overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative blood loss, R0 rate, and recurrence-free survival. Discussion If the MAPLE-PD trial shows the oncological benefits of the mesenteric approach for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, this procedure may become a standard approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03317886. Registered on 23 October 2017. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000029615. Registered on 15 January 2018