Estimation Error Consisting of Motor Imagery and Motor Execution in Patients with Stroke

Previous studies demonstrate that the difference between motor imagery and actual tasks (estimation error) is related to cognitive and physical functions and that a large estimation error (LE) is related to motor imagery ability, including cognitive and physical functions in healthy subjects. The purpose of this study investigated whether estimation error is related to physical and cognitive function in patients with stroke. The study included 60 patients with stroke. The Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) was employed to assess estimation error. First, the imagined TUGT (iTUGT) was performed; thereafter, the actual TUGT was performed. The estimation error was calculated by subtracting TUGT from iTUGT, with conversion to the absolute value. The patients were classified into the small estimation error (SE) and LE groups, with comparisons of various clinical scores (Mini-Mental State Examination, Berg Balance Scale, 10-m walking speed, Brunnstrom Recovery Stage, and Functional Independence Measure). As a result, the estimation error was significantly larger in the LE group than in the SE group. Cognitive function and balance ability were significantly lower in the LE group than in the SE group. In conclusion, the estimation error was related to physical and cognitive functions in patients with stroke.</p

Data_Sheet_1_Estimation of minimal detectable change in the 10-meter walking test for patients with stroke: a study stratified by gait speed.docx

ObjectiveThis study aimed to classify and calculate the minimal detectable changes (MDC) in gait time and gait speed in a 10-meter walking test (10MWT) in patients with stroke classified according to their gait speed.MethodsThe participants were 84 patients with stroke. Their gait times were measured twice each at their comfortable gait speed (CGS) and maximum gait speed (MGS) on a 10-meter straight track, and gait speed was calculated using gait time. Participants were assigned to three speed groups based on their CGS: low-speed (0.8 m/s; n = 36). For each group, first and second retest reliability and MDC of CGS and MGS were calculated using gait time and gait speed in the 10MWT.ResultsMDCs in the 10MWT at CGS were: low-speed group, gait time 5.25 s, gait speed 0.05 m/s; moderate-speed group, gait time 2.83 s, gait speed 0.11 m/s; and high-speed group, gait time 1.58 s, gait speed 0.21 m/s. MDCs in the 10MWT at MGS were: low-speed group, gait time 7.26 s, gait speed 0.04 m/s; moderate-speed group, gait time 2.48 s, gait speed 0.12 m/s; and high-speed group, gait time 1.28 s, gait speed 0.19 m/s.ConclusionSince the MDC of gait speed and gait time differ depending on the participant’s gait speed, it is necessary to interpret the results according to the participant’s gait speed when judging the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.</p