7 research outputs found
Oligo(lactic acid)<sub><i>n</i></sub>‑Paclitaxel Prodrugs for Poly(ethylene glycol)-<i>block</i>-poly(lactic acid) Micelles: Loading, Release, and Backbiting Conversion for Anticancer Activity
PolyÂ(ethylene
glycol)-<i>block</i>-polyÂ(d,l-lactic acid)
(PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA) micelles are nanocarriers
for poorly water-soluble anticancer agents and have advanced paclitaxel
(PTX) to humans due to drug solubilization, biocompatibility, and
dose escalation. However, PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles rapidly
release PTX, resulting in widespread biodistribution and low tumor
exposure. To improve delivery of PTX by PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA
micelles, monodisperse oligoÂ(l-lactic acid), oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub> or oÂ(LA)<sub>16</sub>, has been coupled onto PTX at the 7-OH position,
forming ester prodrugs: oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub>-PTX and oÂ(LA)<sub>16</sub>-PTX, respectively. As expected, oÂ(LA)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-PTX was more compatible with PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles
than PTX, increasing drug loading from 11 to 54%. While <i>in
vitro</i> release of PTX was rapid, resulting in precipitation,
oÂ(LA)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-PTX release was more gradual: <i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub> = 14 and 26 h for oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub>-PTX
and oÂ(LA)<sub>16</sub>-PTX, respectively. Notably, oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub>-PTX and oÂ(LA)<sub>16</sub>-PTX in PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles
resisted backbiting chain end scission, based on reverse-phase HPLC
analysis. By contrast, oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub>-PTX and oÂ(LA)<sub>16</sub>-PTX degraded substantially in 1:1 acetonitrile:10 mM PBS, pH 7.4,
at 37 °C, generating primarily oÂ(LA)<sub>2</sub>-PTX. The IC<sub>50</sub> value of oÂ(LA)<sub>2</sub>-PTX was ∼2.3 nM for A549
human lung cancer cells, equipotent with PTX <i>in vitro</i>. After weekly IV injections at 20 mg/kg as PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles, oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub>-PTX induced tumor regression in
A549 tumor-bearing mice, whereas PTX delayed tumor growth. Surprisingly,
oÂ(LA)<sub>8</sub>-PTX caused less toxicity than PTX in terms of change
in body weight. In conclusion, oÂ(LA)<sub><i>n</i></sub> acts
as a novel promoiety, undergoing backbiting conversion without a reliance
on metabolizing enzymes, and oÂ(LA)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-PTX
improves PTX delivery by PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles, providing
a strong justification for clinical evaluation
Stereocomplex Prodrugs of Oligo(lactic acid)<sub><i>n</i></sub>‑Gemcitabine in Poly(ethylene glycol)-<i>block</i>-poly(d,l‑lactic acid) Micelles for Improved Physical Stability and Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy
Herein we demonstrate
the formation of stereocomplex prodrugs of
oligoÂ(l-lactic acid)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-gemcitabine
(oÂ(LLA)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-GEM) and oligoÂ(d-lactic
acid)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-gemcitabine (oÂ(DLA)<sub><i>n</i></sub>-GEM) for stable incorporation in polyÂ(ethylene glycol)-<i>block</i>-polyÂ(d,l-lactic acid) (PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA) micelles. OÂ(LLA)<sub><i>n</i></sub> or
oÂ(DLA)<sub><i>n</i></sub> was attached at the amino group
(4-(<i>N</i>)) of GEM <i>via</i> an amide linkage.
When <i>n</i> = 10, a 1:1 mixture of oÂ(LLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM and oÂ(DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM (oÂ(L+DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM) was
able to form a stereocomplex with a distinctive crystalline pattern.
Degradation of oÂ(L+DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM was driven by both backbiting
conversion and esterase contribution, generating primarily oÂ(L+DLA)<sub>1</sub>-GEM and GEM. OÂ(L+DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM stably loaded in PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles in the size range of 140–200 nm with
an unexpected elongated morphology. The resulting micelles showed
improved physical stability in aqueous media and inhibited backbiting
conversion of oÂ(L+DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM within micelles. Release of
oÂ(L+DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM from micelles was relatively slow, with
a <i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub> at <i>ca</i>. 60 h. Furthermore,
weekly administration of oÂ(L+DLA)<sub>10</sub>-GEM micelles i.v. displayed
potent antitumor activity in an A549 human non-small-cell lung carcinoma
xenograft model. Thus, stereocomplexation of isotactic oÂ(LLA)<sub><i>n</i></sub> and oÂ(DLA)<sub><i>n</i></sub> acts
as a potential prodrug strategy for improved stability and sustained
drug release in PEG-<i>b</i>-PLA micelles
Dose response of prostate cancer cells to individual drugs.
<p>(A-B) Cells were grown in either control regular media or media supplemented with DHT of increasing concentrations. Cell growth was assessed using Alamar Blue assay as described in Materials and Methods. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments. (C) Immunoblotting was performed from equal amount of total protein using the phospho-AKT, AKT, and β-actin antibodies as described in Materials and Methods. (D-I) Cytotoxic effects of increasing doses of docetaxel (D, G), rapamycin (E, H), and 17-AAG (F, I) in PTEN-P2 cells (D, E, F) and PTEN-CaP2 cells (G, H, I). Cells were exposed to the indicated concentration of drug-loaded micelle or empty micelle for 72 hours. Cell viability was assessed using Alamar Blue assay as described in Materials and Methods. * indicates statistically significant differences compared to micelle control (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Results are representative of 3 independent experiments.</p
Dose response of prostate cancer cells to multi-drug loaded micelles.
<p>Cytotoxic effects of DR17 in PTEN-P2 (A, C, E) and PTEN-CaP2 cells (B, D, F). Dose responses of PTEN-P2 (A, C) and PTEN-CaP2 (B, D) to DR17 free form or DR17 delivered by micelle (DR17). Cells were exposed to the indicated concentrations of free form DR17 or DMSO, or DR17 loaded micelle or empty micelle for 72 hours. Cell viability was assessed using Alamar Blue assay as described in Materials and Methods. E-F, Comparison of cytotoxic effects of three-drug combination DR17 to individual drug loaded micelles (C, D). For C and D, DR17 was added to the media to the final concentration of 105μM. Final concentrations of docetaxel, rapamycin, 17-AAG were calculated based on molarity ratio of each individual drug in the DR17 formula [docetaxel:rapamycin:17-AAG (1:1:8.5)], which are 12.38μM, 10.94μM, and 85.37μM, respectively. Cells were exposed to the indicated drug conditions for 72 hours. Cell viability was assessed using Alamar Blue assay as described in Materials and Methods. * indicates statistically significant differences compared to DR17 treatment (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Results are representative of 3 independent experiments.</p
Histology of DR17 and micelle control treated prostates.
<p>Pten het N = 9 (A, B, E, F, I, J) and Pten null N = 6 (C, D, G, H, K, L) mice were treated with empty micelles (Ctrl) or DR17 loaded micelles for 3 weeks. Animals were sacrifice two days after the last injection. Prostates were dissected and fixed in formalin. Prostate sections were used for H&E staining to assess overall morphology (A-D). Immunohistochemistry was performed to examine stromal smooth muscle actin (SMA, E-H) and epithelial cytokeratin (I-L) markers. Pictures were taken at 40X magnification. The black bar in each picture represents 30 microns.</p
Effects of DR17 on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and prostate basal cells.
<p>Pten het N = 9 (A, B, E, F, I, J) and Pten null N = 6 (C, D, G, H, K, L) mice were treated with empty micelles or DR17 loaded micelles for 3 weeks. Animals were sacrifice two days after the last injection. Prostates were dissected and fixed in formalin. Immunohistochemistry staining for proliferation marker Ki67 (A-D), apoptosis marker cleaved caspase 3 (E-H), and basal cell marker p63 (I-L) was performed on prostate tissue sections. Pictures were taken at 100X magnification. The black bar in each picture represents 10 microns. Quantification of Ki67 (M), cleaved caspase 3 (N), and p63 (O) labeling index was conducted as described in Materials and Methods. Differences from control were statistically significant as indicated by * (Student’s <i>t</i> test, p < 0.05).</p
Expression of proteins in PI3K/Akt and AR pathways in PTEN-P2 and PTEN-CaP2 cells in response to DR17, docetaxel (DTX), 17AAG, and rapamycin (Rap) treatments.
<p>DR17, docetaxel, 17AAG, and rapamycin were added to media to the final concentration of 105μM, 12.38μM, 85.37μM, and 10.94μM, respectively, in which concentrations of individual drug were calculated based on their molarity ratio in DR17 formula [docetaxel:rapamycin:17-AAG (1:1:8.5)]. Cells were exposed to drug treatments for 24h, after which total protein was collected. Immunoblotting was performed from equal amount of total protein using the indicated antibodies as described in Materials and Methods. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments.</p