311 research outputs found
Assessment and intervention issues and models in School Psychology : the case of Europe and North America
As práticas da Psicologia Escolar parecem ser cada vez mais marcadas pelas necessidades de referenciação/diagnóstico
de crianças para o subsistema de educação especial, em detrimento do desenho e implementação de intervenções
dirigidas aos problemas especĂficos dos alunos. A aparente insatisfação dos psicĂłlogos escolares com essa tendĂŞncia,
bem como as dificuldades na utilização de modelos categoriais de diagnóstico em contexto escolar, têm dado origem
à progressiva implementação de modelos alternativos de avaliação e intervenção, principalmente de modelos Response
to Intervention, Curriculum-Based Measurement e Problem Solving. A controvérsia quanto à natureza verdadeiramente
alternativa desses modelos parece, no entanto, longe de se esgotar. Neste artigo são discutidas vantagens e limitações
dos diferentes modelos, de acordo com a melhor evidĂŞncia disponĂvel na literatura, e sĂŁo ainda equacionadas as suas
implicações nas práticas da Psicologia Escolar. Practices in School Psychology seem to be increasingly restricted to referrals/diagnosis of children for the sub-system
of special education instead of being focused on the design and implementation of interventions for students with
specific problems. The apparent dissatisfaction of school psychologists with this trend and the difficulties dealing with
categorical diagnostic models within the school context have stimulated a movement toward the implementation of
alternative assessment and intervention models, such as Response to Intervention, Curriculum-Based Measurement
and Problem-Solving. However, the controversy about the true alternative nature of these models seems far from
being exhausted. The aim of this paper is to discuss the benefits and limitations of the different models according to
the best evidence available. We also consider the implications for practices in School PsychologyPractices in School Psychology seem to be increasingly restricted to referrals/diagnosis of children for the sub-system
of special education instead of being focused on the design and implementation of interventions for students with
specific problems. The apparent dissatisfaction of school psychologists with this trend and the difficulties dealing with
categorical diagnostic models within the school context have stimulated a movement toward the implementation of
alternative assessment and intervention models, such as Response to Intervention, Curriculum-Based Measurement
and Problem-Solving. However, the controversy about the true alternative nature of these models seems far from
being exhausted. The aim of this paper is to discuss the benefits and limitations of the different models according to
the best evidence available. We also consider the implications for practices in School Psychology(undefined
Examining the Context of Strategy Instruction
The goal of literacy instruction is to teach reading and writing as tools to facilitate thinking and reasoning in a broad array of literacy events. An important difference in the disposition of children to participate in literacy experiences is the extent to which they engage in intentional self-regulated learning. The contexts attending six traditional models of strategy instruction are examined. An exploratory study, conducted with heterogeneous third graders, is reported, examining the implementation and outcomes of three models of strategy instruction—Direct Instruction, Reciprocal Teaching, and Collaborative Problem Solving—which manipulated teacher and student control of activity, as well as the instructional context.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69008/2/10.1177_074193259101200306.pd
From Biology to Mathematical Models and Back: Teaching Modeling to Biology Students, and Biology to Math and Engineering Students
We describe the development of a course to teach modeling and mathematical analysis skills to students of biology and to teach biology to students with strong backgrounds in mathematics, physics, or engineering. The two groups of students have different ways of learning material and often have strong negative feelings toward the area of knowledge that they find difficult. To give students a sense of mastery in each area, several complementary approaches are used in the course: 1) a “live” textbook that allows students to explore models and mathematical processes interactively; 2) benchmark problems providing key skills on which students make continuous progress; 3) assignment of students to teams of two throughout the semester; 4) regular one-on-one interactions with instructors throughout the semester; and 5) a term project in which students reconstruct, analyze, extend, and then write in detail about a recently published biological model. Based on student evaluations and comments, an attitude survey, and the quality of the students' term papers, the course has significantly increased the ability and willingness of biology students to use mathematical concepts and modeling tools to understand biological systems, and it has significantly enhanced engineering students' appreciation of biology
Labeling Preschoolers as Learning Disabled: A Cautionary Position
The purpose of this article is to explore the issues concerning the adaptation of school-based service delivery concepts for use in early childhood special education programs. The use of categorical labels for determining eligibility for preschool children is not required by law—and may be detrimental. The following concerns are discussed: (a) definitional issues in learning disabilities versus low achievement, (b) the dangers of labeling and low expectation sets, (c) repeated failure to demonstrate movement through a continuum of services (particularly to least restrictive environments), and (d) the efficacy of early intervention and school-based special services for those with mild or suspected developmental disabilities. Research is reviewed concerning definitional and assessment issues utilizing learning disabilities as a construct. Alternatives for describing the characteristics of young children who are significantly at risk or developmentally delayed are provided.Yeshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guideline
Social Justice and Technocracy: Tracing the Narratives of Inclusive Education in the United States
Over the past two decades, the percentage of American students with disabilities educated in general classrooms with their nondisabled peers has risen by approximately fifty percent. This gradual but steady policy shift has been driven by two distinct narratives of organisational change. The social justice narrative espouses principles of equality and caring across human differences. The narrative of technocracy creates top-down, administrative pressure through hierarchical systems based on quantitative performance data. This article examines these two primary policy narratives of inclusive education in the United States, exploring the conceptual features of each and initiating an analysis of their application in the public schools
All different or all the same? Exploring the diversity of professional practices in Portuguese school psychology
"Published online: 29 March 2016"Studies have generally characterized school psychologists as a relative homogenous population. Understanding the differences in professional practices and related variables is important for the development of the profession. Using a sample of 446 Portuguese school psychologists, this study used cluster analysis to identify distinct profiles of professional activity, based on practitioners’ time distribution among different target audiences (i.e.,students, parents, teachers, school board members, school non-professional staff, and other professionals within the school community). Three distinct profiles emerged from the data: a group highly oriented to work with students, a group that distributes time almost equitably
between adults and students, and a group that concentrates attention and professional expertise on adults. Practice setting variables, such as school-psychologists-to-student ratio, schoolpsychologists-to-school ratio, number of referrals per year, and school community level of demand for different activities, were found to be significantly related to cluster membership. No personal- or professional-background-related variables differentiated the three groups. The main implications of these findings are discussed in light of recent literature regarding the models of service delivery for school psychologists
- …