14 research outputs found

    The robustness of our method and comparison with the WGCNA method.

    No full text
    <p><b>a</b>) X-axis is samples. Y-axis is the lung cancer risk score of individual samples using our method, and it is ranked from the smallest to the largest. Blue represents GSE10072; green represents GSE21933; red represents GSE27262; and brown represents GSE4079. Full lines represent lung cancer samples; and dashed lines represent normal samples. The different experiment data sets have different numbers of the normal samples and the disease samples. In order to show the disease risk of every sample in four expression profiles intuitively, all samples of each expression profiles are distributed uniformly throughout x-axis. <b>b</b>) The figure is plotted the same way as a). The lung cancer risk of each sample is evaluated by the WGCNA method. <b>c</b>) Receiver operator characteristic curve using our method for the four lung cancer expression profiles (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0092395#pone-0092395-g007" target="_blank">Figure 7a</a>). The areas under curve provided at lower right of each diagram. <b>d</b>) Receiver operator characteristic curve using the WGCNA method for the four lung cancer expression profiles (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0092395#pone-0092395-g007" target="_blank">Figure 7b</a>).</p

    Cancer-Risk Module Identification and Module-Based Disease Risk Evaluation: A Case Study on Lung Cancer

    No full text
    <div><p>Gene expression profiles have drawn broad attention in deciphering the pathogenesis of human cancers. Cancer-related gene modules could be identified in co-expression networks and be applied to facilitate cancer research and clinical diagnosis. In this paper, a new method was proposed to identify lung cancer-risk modules and evaluate the module-based disease risks of samples. The results showed that thirty one cancer-risk modules were closely related to the lung cancer genes at the functional level and interactional level, indicating that these modules and genes might synergistically lead to the occurrence of lung cancer. Our method was proved to have good robustness by evaluating the disease risk of samples in eight cancer expression profiles (four for lung cancer and four for other cancers), and had better performance than the WGCNA method. This method could provide assistance to the diagnosis and treatment of cancers and a new clue for explaining cancer mechanisms.</p></div

    Lung cancer-risk modules.

    No full text
    <p>Risk is modules category, ID indicate the identifier of cancer-risk modules, size is the module scale, namely the number of genes in the module, genes is the genes in the modules and the genes which were marked * were DE-genes, M<sub>risk</sub> is the cancer risk of modules, p-value is significance p value of random randomized test.</p

    The relationship network of cancer-risk modules and lung cancer genes.

    No full text
    <p>The circles indicate cancer-risk modules, and the proportion of orange parts indicates cancer risk (<i>M<sub>risk</sub></i>). The disease-causing genes is represented by red triangles. Edges' colors indicate the relationships, purple represents for the protein-protein interaction, green for function sharing, and red for both functional and interaction relationship.</p

    Z-test.

    No full text
    <p>Where <i>μ</i> means the average expression value of all genes in module1 for the tumor sample s1; e11 is the expression value of g1 in module1 for s1, so do others; means the average expression value of all genes for all normal samples; σ is the standard deviation of all normal samples.</p
    corecore