Real-World Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia among Patients Treated with Single-Agent Amrubicin: Necessity of the Primary Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Background: Single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy is a key regimen, especially for small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, it can cause severe myelosuppression. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the real-world incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) among patients treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy for thoracic malignancies. Patients and methods: The medical records of consecutive patients with thoracic malignancies, including SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who were treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy in cycle 1 between January 2010 and March 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: One hundred and fifty-six patients from four institutions were enrolled. Their characteristics were as follows: median age (range): 68 (32–86); male/female: 126/30; performance status (0/1/2): 9/108/39; SCLC/NSCLC/others: 111/30/15; and prior treatment (0/1/2/3-): 1/96/31/28. One hundred and thirty-four (86%) and 97 (62%) patients experienced grade 3/4 and grade 4 neutropenia, respectively. One hundred and twelve patients (72%) required therapeutic G-CSF treatment, and 47 (30%) developed FN. Prophylactic PEG-G-CSF was not used in cycle 1 in any case. The median overall survival of the patients with FN was significantly shorter than that of the patients without FN (7.2 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.025). Conclusions: The real-world incidence rate of FN among patients with thoracic malignancies that were treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy was 30%. It is suggested that prophylactic G-CSF should be administered during the practical use of single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy for patients who have already received chemotherapy

Real-World Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia among Patients Treated with Single-Agent Amrubicin: Necessity of the Primary Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Background: Single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy is a key regimen, especially for small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, it can cause severe myelosuppression. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the real-world incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) among patients treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy for thoracic malignancies. Patients and methods: The medical records of consecutive patients with thoracic malignancies, including SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who were treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy in cycle 1 between January 2010 and March 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: One hundred and fifty-six patients from four institutions were enrolled. Their characteristics were as follows: median age (range): 68 (32–86); male/female: 126/30; performance status (0/1/2): 9/108/39; SCLC/NSCLC/others: 111/30/15; and prior treatment (0/1/2/3-): 1/96/31/28. One hundred and thirty-four (86%) and 97 (62%) patients experienced grade 3/4 and grade 4 neutropenia, respectively. One hundred and twelve patients (72%) required therapeutic G-CSF treatment, and 47 (30%) developed FN. Prophylactic PEG-G-CSF was not used in cycle 1 in any case. The median overall survival of the patients with FN was significantly shorter than that of the patients without FN (7.2 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.025). Conclusions: The real-world incidence rate of FN among patients with thoracic malignancies that were treated with single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy was 30%. It is suggested that prophylactic G-CSF should be administered during the practical use of single-agent amrubicin chemotherapy for patients who have already received chemotherapy

Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy associated with lung cancer: Possible links among hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α, vascular endothelial growth factor, and hypervascularization

Abstract Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (HOA) is a paraneoplastic syndrome, the exact pathogenesis of which remains to be elucidated. The case of a 69‐year‐old man who developed intractably painful HOA secondary to lung cancer is presented. Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography of the chest showed an 80‐mm solid nodule with a large low‐density area. The patient was diagnosed as having stage IIIA undifferentiated non–small cell lung cancer. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel with bevacizumab reduced tumor size and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels, relieving his leg pain. On immunohistochemical examination, lung cancer cells were positive for VEGF. A hypoxic tumor microenvironment may have caused some lung cancer cells to express hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α, which contributed, at least in part, to the production of VEGF. The deep dermis vessels showed proliferation in the shin, with their thickened walls positive for VEGF. These findings may encourage investigators to explore novel management strategies for painful HOA

Phase II study of IRInotecan treatment after COmbined chemo‐immunotherapy for extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: Protocol of IRICO study

Abstract Introduction Combined treatment using anti‐programmed death‐ligand 1 antibody (anti‐PD‐L1) and platinum‐etoposide is the current standard first‐line treatment for patients with extensive‐stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the best treatment for relapsed ES‐SCLC after the first‐line treatment remains unclear. There are some approved chemotherapeutic agents that can be used against ES‐SCLC, and treatment with irinotecan is well established as both a monotherapy and a combined therapy, in combination with platinum. Therefore, we conduct a phase II study with irinotecan in the second‐ or later‐line setting for patients with ES‐SCLC who have been previously treated with combined treatment. Methods Our study will enroll total 30 patients who are diagnosed with ES‐SCLC and have experienced disease progression after the combined treatment. Patients will receive irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15, which will be repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of irinotecan (100/80/60 mg/m2) will be determined according to the type of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism, and the treatment will be discontinued following disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of patient consent, and based on the investigator's decision. The primary endpoint of the study is the response rate, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression‐free survival, and safety. Discussion Since the present first‐line treatment has been changed to the combined treatment, the second‐ or later‐line treatment should be re‐evaluated for patients with relapsed SCLC. Irinotecan is a major chemotherapeutic agent used for SCLC. This study demonstrates and re‐evaluates the clinical benefits of irinotecan after combined treatment with anti‐PD‐L1 and platinum‐etoposide for patients with ES‐SCLC. Registration details This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (no. jRCT s071210090) on November 4, 2021