Bigger, Better, Together: Building the Digital Library of the Future

http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107414/1/york-LITAGuideProof-201405.pdfDescription of york-LITAGuideProof-201405.pdf : Book chapte

What Do We Know About The Stewardship Gap?

In the 21st century, digital data drive innovation and decision-making in nearly every field. However, little is known about the total size, characteristics, and sustainability of these data. In the scholarly sphere, it is widely suspected that there is a gap between the amount of valuable digital data that is produced and the amount that is effectively stewarded and made accessible. The Stewardship Gap Project (http://bit.ly/stewardshipgap) seeks to investigate characteristics of and measure the stewardship gap for sponsored scholarly activity in the United States. This paper presents a preliminary definition of the stewardship gap based on a review of relevant literature and investigates areas of the stewardship gap for which metrics have been developed and measurements made, and where work to measure the stewardship gap is yet to be done. The main findings presented are 1) there is not one stewardship gap but rather multiple “gaps” that contribute to whether data is responsibly stewarded; 2) there are relationships between the gaps that can be used to guide strategies for addressing the stewardship gap; and 3) there are imbalances in the types and depths of studies that have been conducted to measure the stewardship gap.Alfred P. Sloan Foundationhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/122726/1/StewardshipGap_Final.pdfDescription of StewardshipGap_Final.pdf : Main articl

The Stewardship Gap: A Challenge in Long-Term Access to Data

Despite broad consensus among many in the scientific research, data, and policy communities about the importance of preserving and sharing research data, there are significant concerns about the adequacy of measures being taken today to enable these activities. The difference between current activities and best or ideal policies and practices constitutes a gap that this article describes: the stewardship gap—a gap that will require innovative strategies by researchers, research organizations, and research sponsors to address. The authors interviewed 46 active researchers, drawn from a variety of scientific domains, to understand their perspectives on the value of their research data, the length of time their data would remain valuable, and the kind and extent of commitments in place to ensure ongoing preservation of valuable data. In all, the researchers provided descriptions, valuations, and prospective plans for 120 datasets produced in 46 projects. Four concepts are valuable for understanding our findings: the kinds of commitment researchers receive from data stewards; who takes responsibility for stewardship; the value of the data as perceived by the researcher and others; and the length of time over which data are valuable and commitments exist. Based on this study as a representation of the larger cohort of data created with federal and foundation R&D support, research data are "at risk." This is especially so when data are valuable and the length of time for which there is a preservation commitment is less than the length of time that the data will have value. Closing gaps in commitment and responsibility is essential if valuable data are to be effectively preserved. This calls for clear policy directives from government agencies and other research sponsors in partnership with research-performing institutions, designation and acceptance of responsibility, and supporting human and financial investments for the research data the community deems as valuable.Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; University of Colorado Boulderhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146759/6/Stewardship Gap Article for deep blue-updated January 2019.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146759/1/Stewardship Gap Article for Deep Blue.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146759/2/Stewardship Gap Supplemental Materials for Deep Blue.pdf1517137Description of Stewardship Gap Article for deep blue-updated January 2019.pdf : Main Article (January 2019)Description of Stewardship Gap Article for Deep Blue.pdf : Previous VersionDescription of Stewardship Gap Supplemental Materials for Deep Blue.pdf : Supplemental Material

HathiTrust: słoń w bibliotece

The author is a librarian of the HathiTrust partnership, California. He describes the beginning and the development of a huge collaborative project comprising around 60 American libraries. Its mission is “To contribute to the common good by collecting, organizing, preserving, and sharing the record of human knowledge”. HathiTrust has organized a great common repository of digitized library materials. The reposytory provides open access to over 10 million digital units. The author points out advantages of cooperation in such a project and discusses tasks undertaken to enrich the library.Autor, który jest bibliotekarzem projektu HathiTrust, przedstawia początki i rozwój wielkiego konsorcyjnego przedsięwzięcia wielu bibliotek amerykańskich, które zdecydowały, że razem będą tworzyły jedno wielkie repozytorium zdigitalizowanych materiałów bibliotecznych. Biblioteka pokazuje w wolnym dostępie ponad 10 mln obiektów cyfrowych. Autor bardzo mocno podkreśla korzyści, jakie czerpie się ze współdziałania przy takim pro-jekcie i opisuje przedsięwzięcia podjęte dla wzbogacania biblioteki

Blue horizontal branch stars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: II. Kinematics of the Galactic halo

We carry out a maximum-likelihood kinematic analysis of a sample of 1170 blue horizontal branch (BHB) stars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey presented in Sirko et al. (2003) (Paper I). Monte Carlo simulations and resampling show that the results are robust to distance and velocity errors at least as large as the estimated errors from Paper I. The best-fit velocities of the Sun (circular) and halo (rotational) are 245.9 +/- 13.5 km/s and 23.8 +/- 20.1 km/s but are strongly covariant, so that v_0 - v_halo = 222.1 +/- 7.7 km/s. If one adopts standard values for the local standard of rest and solar motion, then the halo scarcely rotates. The velocity ellipsoid inferred for our sample is much more isotropic [(sigma_r,sigma_theta,sigma_phi) = (101.4 +/- 2.8, 97.7 +/- 16.4, 107.4 +/- 16.6) km/s] than that of halo stars in the solar neighborhood, in agreement with a recent study of the distant halo by Sommer-Larsen et al. (1997). The line-of-sight velocity distribution of the entire sample, corrected for the Sun's motion, is accurately gaussian with a dispersion of 101.6 +/- 3.0 km/s.Comment: 23 pages including 4 figures, 1 color; submitted to A

Will Today’s Data Be Here Tomorrow? Measuring The Stewardship Gap

Stakeholders in scholarly research are paying increased attention to stewardship of digital research data¹ for the purposes of advancing scientific discovery, driving innovation, and promoting trust in science and scholarship. However, little is known about the total amounts, characteristics, and sustainability of data that could be used for these purposes. The Stewardship Gap is an 18-month project funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to understand issues in defining metrics for and measuring the stewardship gap: the potential gap between the amount of valuable data produced through sponsored projects in the United States and the amount that is effectively stewarded and made accessible. This paper reports on the first phase of the project, which sought to develop an instrument to gather information about research data sustainability from a broad variety of researchers and research disciplines and make progress toward the ultimate goals of 1) shedding light on the size, characteristics, and sustainability of valuable sponsored research data and creative work in the United States, and 2) recommending actions stakeholders can take to address the stewardship gap if one is found to exist

What Do We Know about the Stewardship Gap

In the 21st century, digital data drive innovation and decision-making in nearly every field. However, little is known about the total size, characteristics, and sustainability of these data. In the scholarly sphere, it is widely suspected that there is a gap between the amount of valuable digital data that is produced and the amount that is effectively stewarded and made accessible. The Stewardship Gap Project (http://bit.ly/stewardshipgap) investigates characteristics of, and measures, the stewardship gap for sponsored scholarly activity in the United States. This paper presents a preliminary definition of the stewardship gap based on a review of relevant literature and investigates areas of the stewardship gap for which metrics have been developed and measurements made, and where work to measure the stewardship gap is yet to be done. The main findings presented are 1) there is not one stewardship gap but rather multiple “gaps” that contribute to whether data is responsibly stewarded; 2) there are relationships between the gaps that can be used to guide strategies for addressing the various stewardship gaps; and 3) there are imbalances in the types and depths of studies that have been conducted to measure the stewardship gap

Diving behavior of immature Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus)

Understanding the ontogenetic relationship between juvenile Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) and their foraging habitat is key to understanding their relationship to available prey and ultimately their survival. We summarize dive and movement data from 13 young-of-the-year (YOY) and 12 yearling Steller sea lions equipped with satellite dive recorders in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands (n=18), and Washington (n=7) from 1994 to 2000. A total of 1413 d of transmission (x =56.5 d, range: 14.5–104.1 d) were received. We recorded 222,073 dives, which had a mean depth of 18.4 m (range of means: 5.8−67.9 m; SD=16.4). Alaska YOY dived for shorter periods and at shallower depths (mean depth=7.7 m, mean duration=0.8 min, mean maximum depth=25.7 m, and maximum depth=252 m) than Alaska yearlings (x =16.6 m, 0=1.1 min, x = 63.4 m, 288 m), whereas Washington yearlings dived the longest and deepest (mean depth=39.4 m, mean duration=1.8 min, mean maximum depth=144.5 m, and maximum depth=328 m). Mean distance for 564 measured trips was 16.6 km; for sea lions ≤10 months of age, trip distance (7.0 km) was significantly less than for those >10 months of age (24.6 km). Mean trip duration for 10 of the 25 sea lions was 12.1 h; for sea lions ≤10 months of age, trip duration was 7.5 h and 18.1 h for those >10 months of age. We identified three movements types: long-range trips (>15 km and >20 h), short-range trips (<15 km and <20 h) during which the animals left and returned to the same site, and transits to other haul-out sites. Long-range trips started around 9 months of age and occurred most frequently around the assumed time of weaning, whereas short-range trips happened almost daily (0.9 trips/day, n=426 trips). Transits began as early as 7 months of age, occurred more often after 9 months of age, and ranged between 6.5 and 454 km. The change in dive characteristics coincided with the assumed onset of weaning. These yearling sea lion movement patterns and dive characteristics suggest that immature Steller sea lions are as capable of making the same types of movements as adults