Online search strategies utilized in feigning attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) while performing a continuous performance test (CPT)

The availability of information regarding neuropsychological tests threatens their confidentiality. This concern may be particularly relevant to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) considering its widespread online coverage. The present study explored simulators’ online search strategies. Simulators (n = 39) searched for information before undergoing an evaluation which included performing a continuous performance test (CPT). Their search strategies were analyzed, and their performance was compared to that of ADHD patients (n = 36) and healthy controls (n = 38). Most simulators reached high-risk websites that provided written and video-based information regarding the test. Sixty percent, comprised mostly of 3rd-year students, reached Google Scholar. These students were also easier to detect as simulators. Common strategies included performing the CPT in accordance with typical ADHD symptoms and avoiding the endorsement of both unusual and stereotypical symptoms. Simulators can access online information that contains key test data. Higher education may increase the ability to reach academic research while decreasing the ability to convincingly feign impairment. While additional research is needed to examine coaching effects on neuropsychological testing, the risk to test security that many websites pose should be acknowledged and steps, including ones taken by test publishers, should be undertaken to minimize it.</p

The utility of the Poreh Nonverbal Memory Test (PNMT) for the detection of noncredible performance

Performance validity tests (PVTs) aim to detect noncredible performance during neuropsychological testing. Despite their established utility, their cognitively undemanding nature and format may unintentionally reveal their purpose, leading to ongoing efforts to develop novel PVTs. In this study, we examined the ability of the embedded validity indices of the Poreh Nonverbal Memory Test (PNMT) to detect simulation. An initial sample of 61 participants was randomly assigned to either a simulation or control condition. Participants then completed the PNMT, the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), and the Digit Span subtest. A second validation study using 49 participants was conducted in Israel utilizing the same paradigm. In both studies, simulators were less accurate, exhibited shallow and– at times– reversed PNMT learning curves, and obtained lower scores on the delayed and recognition trials. Additionally, PNMT indices showed similar sensitivity and specificity and were highly correlated with more established validity measures. These findings, however, should be considered preliminary and await further validation in clinical settings.</p