20 research outputs found

    Apoptosis of αÎČ T lymphocytes in the nervous system in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: Its possible implications for recovery and acquired tolerance

    Get PDF
    We have recently shown that apoptosis, an active process of cellular self-destruction, occurs in the central nervous system in Lewis rats with acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) induced by inoculation with myelin basic protein (MBP) and adjuvants. Conventional light and electron microscopic studies suggested that some of the apoptotic cells were oligodendrocytes and that others were hematogenous mononuclear cells. To determine whether any of the apoptotic cells were T lymphocytes, we used the technique of pre-embedding immunolabelling which allows sufficient preservation of the ultrastructure to permit recognition of apoptotic changes while at the same time preserving surface antigens so that the identity of the apoptotic cells can be determined by immunocytochemistry. Light microscopic immunocytochemistry using the mono-clonal antibodies OX-34 (CD2) and R73 (alpha beta T-cell receptor) revealed that 10% of the CD2+ cells and 5% of the alpha beta T lymphocytes in the parenchyma of the spinal cord were dying by apoptosis. The presence of apoptotic alpha beta T cells was confirmed by electron microscopy. About half of all the apoptotic cells within the spinal cord were labelled by these antibodies. It is possible that some of the unlabelled apoptotic cells were also T lymphocytes but that others were glial cells such as oligodendrocytes. One possible interpretation of this T-cell apoptosis is that it represents activation-induced cell death, which has recently been shown to provide a mechanism of clonal elimination of mature as well as immature autoreactive T cells. Another possible interpretation is that it is a result of corticosterone released during the course of EAE. The apoptotic elimination of target-antigen-specific lymphocytes within the target organ in this autoimmune disease may contribute to the subsidence of inflammation and, if ongoing, to the development of tolerance

    Antibody-mediated enhancement of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection

    No full text
    Community-acquired infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) expressing the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) are rampant, but the contribution of PVL to bacterial virulence remains controversial. While PVL is usually viewed as a cytotoxin, at sublytic amounts it activates protective innate immune responses. A leukotoxic effect might predominate in high inoculum studies, whereas protective proinflammatory properties might predominate in settings with lower bacterial inocula that more closely mimic what initially occurs in humans. However, these protective effects might possibly be neutralized by antibodies to PVL, which are found in normal human sera and at increased levels following PVL+ S. aureus infections. In a low-inoculum murine skin abscess model including a foreign body at the infection site, strains deleted for the pvl genes replicated more efficiently within abscesses than isogenic PVL+ strains. Coinfection of mice at separate sites with isogenic PVL+ and PVL- MRSA abrogated the differences in bacterial burdens, indicating a systemic effect on host innate immunity from production of PVL. Mice given antibody to PVL and then infected with seven different PVL+ strains also had significantly higher bacterial counts in abscesses compared with mice given nonimmune serum. Antibody to PVL had no effect on MRSA strains that did not produce PVL. In vitro, antibody to PVL incapacitated PVL-mediated activation of PMNs, indicating that virulence of PVL+ MRSA is enhanced by the interference of PVL-activated innate immune responses. Given the high rates of primary and recurring MRSA infections in humans, it appears that antibodies to PVL might contribute to host susceptibility to infection

    Titration of medications and outcomes in multi-ethnic heart failure cohorts (with reduced ejection fraction) from Singapore and New Zealand

    Get PDF
    Aims: We investigated titration patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers, quality of life (QoL) over 6 months, and associated 1 year outcome [all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization] in a real-world population with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: Participants with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40%) from a prospective multi-centre study were examined for use and dose [relative to guideline-recommended maintenance dose (GRD)] of ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers at baseline and 6 months. ‘Stay low’ was defined as &lt;50% GRD at both time points, ‘stay high’ as ≄50% GRD, and ‘up-titrate’ and ‘down-titrate’ as dose trajectories. Among 1110 patients (mean age 63 ± 13 years, 16% women, 26% New York Heart Association Class III/IV), 714 (64%) were multi-ethnic Asians from Singapore and 396 were from New Zealand (mainly European ethnicity). Baseline use of either ACEis/ARBs or beta-blockers was high (87%). Loop diuretic was prescribed in &gt;80% of patients, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in about half of patients, and statins in &gt;90% of patients. At baseline, only 11% and 9% received 100% GRD for each drug class, respectively, with about half (47%) achieving ≄50% GRD for ACEis/ARBs or beta-blockers. At 6 months, a large majority remained in the ‘stay low’ category, one third remained in ‘stay high’, whereas 10–16% up-titrated and 4–6% down-titrated. Patients with lower (vs. higher) N-terminal pro-beta-type natriuretic peptide levels were more likely to be up-titrated or be in ‘stay high’ for ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers (P = 0.002). Ischaemic aetiology, prior HF hospitalization, and enrolment in Singapore (vs. New Zealand) were independently associated with higher odds of ‘staying low’ (all P &lt; 0.005) for prescribed doses of ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers. Adjusted for inverse probability weighting, ≄100% GRD for ACEis/ARBs [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.73] and ≄50% GRD for beta-blockers (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.37–0.90) (vs. Nil) were associated with lower hazards for 1 year composite outcome. Country of enrolment did not modify the associations of dose categories with 1 year composite outcome. Higher medication doses were associated with greater improvements in QoL. Conclusions: Although HF medication use at baseline was high, most patients did not have these medications up-titrated over 6 months. Multiple clinical factors were associated with changes in medication dosages. Further research is urgently needed to investigate the causes of lack of up-titration of HF therapy (and its frequency), which could inform strategies for timely up-titration of HF therapy based on clinical and biochemical parameters.</p

    Titration of medications and outcomes in multi-ethnic heart failure cohorts (with reduced ejection fraction) from Singapore and New Zealand

    Get PDF
    Aims: We investigated titration patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers, quality of life (QoL) over 6 months, and associated 1 year outcome [all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization] in a real-world population with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: Participants with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40%) from a prospective multi-centre study were examined for use and dose [relative to guideline-recommended maintenance dose (GRD)] of ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers at baseline and 6 months. ‘Stay low’ was defined as &lt;50% GRD at both time points, ‘stay high’ as ≄50% GRD, and ‘up-titrate’ and ‘down-titrate’ as dose trajectories. Among 1110 patients (mean age 63 ± 13 years, 16% women, 26% New York Heart Association Class III/IV), 714 (64%) were multi-ethnic Asians from Singapore and 396 were from New Zealand (mainly European ethnicity). Baseline use of either ACEis/ARBs or beta-blockers was high (87%). Loop diuretic was prescribed in &gt;80% of patients, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in about half of patients, and statins in &gt;90% of patients. At baseline, only 11% and 9% received 100% GRD for each drug class, respectively, with about half (47%) achieving ≄50% GRD for ACEis/ARBs or beta-blockers. At 6 months, a large majority remained in the ‘stay low’ category, one third remained in ‘stay high’, whereas 10–16% up-titrated and 4–6% down-titrated. Patients with lower (vs. higher) N-terminal pro-beta-type natriuretic peptide levels were more likely to be up-titrated or be in ‘stay high’ for ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers (P = 0.002). Ischaemic aetiology, prior HF hospitalization, and enrolment in Singapore (vs. New Zealand) were independently associated with higher odds of ‘staying low’ (all P &lt; 0.005) for prescribed doses of ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers. Adjusted for inverse probability weighting, ≄100% GRD for ACEis/ARBs [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.73] and ≄50% GRD for beta-blockers (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.37–0.90) (vs. Nil) were associated with lower hazards for 1 year composite outcome. Country of enrolment did not modify the associations of dose categories with 1 year composite outcome. Higher medication doses were associated with greater improvements in QoL. Conclusions: Although HF medication use at baseline was high, most patients did not have these medications up-titrated over 6 months. Multiple clinical factors were associated with changes in medication dosages. Further research is urgently needed to investigate the causes of lack of up-titration of HF therapy (and its frequency), which could inform strategies for timely up-titration of HF therapy based on clinical and biochemical parameters.</p

    Titration of medications and outcomes in multi-ethnic heart failure cohorts (with reduced ejection fraction) from Singapore and New Zealand

    Get PDF
    Aims: We investigated titration patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers, quality of life (QoL) over 6 months, and associated 1 year outcome [all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization] in a real-world population with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: Participants with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40%) from a prospective multi-centre study were examined for use and dose [relative to guideline-recommended maintenance dose (GRD)] of ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers at baseline and 6 months. ‘Stay low’ was defined as &lt;50% GRD at both time points, ‘stay high’ as ≄50% GRD, and ‘up-titrate’ and ‘down-titrate’ as dose trajectories. Among 1110 patients (mean age 63 ± 13 years, 16% women, 26% New York Heart Association Class III/IV), 714 (64%) were multi-ethnic Asians from Singapore and 396 were from New Zealand (mainly European ethnicity). Baseline use of either ACEis/ARBs or beta-blockers was high (87%). Loop diuretic was prescribed in &gt;80% of patients, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in about half of patients, and statins in &gt;90% of patients. At baseline, only 11% and 9% received 100% GRD for each drug class, respectively, with about half (47%) achieving ≄50% GRD for ACEis/ARBs or beta-blockers. At 6 months, a large majority remained in the ‘stay low’ category, one third remained in ‘stay high’, whereas 10–16% up-titrated and 4–6% down-titrated. Patients with lower (vs. higher) N-terminal pro-beta-type natriuretic peptide levels were more likely to be up-titrated or be in ‘stay high’ for ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers (P = 0.002). Ischaemic aetiology, prior HF hospitalization, and enrolment in Singapore (vs. New Zealand) were independently associated with higher odds of ‘staying low’ (all P &lt; 0.005) for prescribed doses of ACEis/ARBs and beta-blockers. Adjusted for inverse probability weighting, ≄100% GRD for ACEis/ARBs [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.73] and ≄50% GRD for beta-blockers (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.37–0.90) (vs. Nil) were associated with lower hazards for 1 year composite outcome. Country of enrolment did not modify the associations of dose categories with 1 year composite outcome. Higher medication doses were associated with greater improvements in QoL. Conclusions: Although HF medication use at baseline was high, most patients did not have these medications up-titrated over 6 months. Multiple clinical factors were associated with changes in medication dosages. Further research is urgently needed to investigate the causes of lack of up-titration of HF therapy (and its frequency), which could inform strategies for timely up-titration of HF therapy based on clinical and biochemical parameters.</p
    corecore