16 research outputs found
Supplementary Figure S2 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Duration of PFS in the patient subgroup with MET amplification</p
Supplementary Figure S1 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Outcomes of treatment for all individuals enrolled</p
Supplementary Table S2 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Representativeness of study population</p
Supplementary Figure S4 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Treatment-related adverse events in treated patients with MET amplification and/or MET IHC 2+/3+</p
Supplementary Figure S3 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Outcomes of treatment for the patient subgroup with MET overexpression</p
Supplementary Table S3 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Demographic data in the patient subgroup with MET overexpression</p
Supplementary Table S1 from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Demographic data of all individuals enrolled</p
Supplementary PLS from Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to <i>MET</i> Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis
Plain language summary</p
Supplementary Figure S6 from Early Clearance of Plasma <i>Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor</i> Mutations as a Predictor of Outcome on Osimertinib in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer; Exploratory Analysis from AURA3 and FLAURA
Kaplan–Meier estimates showing investigator-assessed PFS in FLAURA trial patients by clearance or non-clearance of plasma EGFRm status at Weeks 3 or 6 in patients who had baseline detectable plasma EGFRm. For comparison, patients with baseline non-detectable plasma EGFRm are included. A, Osimertinib arm by Week 3 plasma EGFRm status (n = 238). B, Comparator EGFR-TKI arm by Week 3 plasma EGFRm status (n = 243). C, Osimertinib arm by Week 6 plasma EGFRm status (n = 240). D, Comparator EGFR-TKI arm by Week 6 plasma EGFRm status (n = 235). Censored data are indicated by tick marks. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EGFRm, epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (ex19del or L858R); NC, not calculable; mPFS, median PFS; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.</p
Supplementary Figure S5 from Early Clearance of Plasma <i>Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor</i> Mutations as a Predictor of Outcome on Osimertinib in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer; Exploratory Analysis from AURA3 and FLAURA
FLAURA flow diagram for ctDNA analysis (n = 499). Clearance refers to non-detectable plasma EGFRm, where EGFRm was detectable at baseline. *There were 3 patients in the osimertinib arm and 7 patients in the comparator EGFR-TKI arm without a valid ddPCR result at Weeks 3 and 6; these samples were excluded from the ctDNA clearance analysis. Abbreviations: ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; EGFRm, epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (ex19del or L858R); TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.</p