Supporting energy regulation by monitoring land motion on a regional and national scale: a case study of Scotland

The advent of new satellite and data processing techniques have meant that routine, operational and reliable surveys of land motion on a regional and national scale are now possible. In this paper, we apply a novel satellite remote sensing technique, the Intermittent Small Baseline Subset method, to data from a new satellite mission, Sentinel-1, and demonstrate that a wide area map of ground deformation can be generated that supports the regulation of a range of energy related activities. The area for the demonstration is mainland Scotland (75,000 km2) and the land motion map required the processing of some 627 images acquired from March 2015 to April 2017. The results show that land motion is encountered almost everywhere across Scotland, dominated by subsidence over peatland areas. However, many other phenomena are also encountered including landslides and deformation associated with mining and civil engineering activities. Considering specifically Petroleum Exploration and Development Licence areas offered under the 14th Onshore Licensing Round in the UK, examples of the types of land motion are shown, including an example related to soil restoration by a wind farm. It is demonstrated that, in Scotland at least, almost all licence areas contain deformation of one form or another and, furthermore, the causes of that subsidence are dynamic and likely to be changing from year-to-year. Therefore, maps like this are likely to be of enormous use in a regulatory framework to scope out pre-existing problems in a licence area and to ensure that the correct monitoring framework is put in place once activities begin. They can also provide evidence of good practice and give assurance against litigation by third parties

How to Reduce Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismicity

The recent growth in energy technologies and the management of subsurface reservoirs has led to increased human interaction with the Earth's crust. One consequence of this is the overall increase of anthropogenic earthquakes. To manage fluid-injection-induced seismicity, in this study, we propose to use an advanced fluid-injection scheme. First, long-term fluid-injection experiments are separated from short-term fluid-injection experiments. Of the short-term experiments, enhanced geothermal systems stimulations have shown a higher propensity to produce larger seismic events compared to hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas. Among the factors discussed for influencing the likelihood of an induced seismic event to occur are injection rate, cumulative injected volume, wellhead pressure, injection depth, stress state, rock type, and proximity to faults. We present and discuss the concept of fatigue hydraulic fracturing at different scales in geothermal applications. In contrast to the conventional hydraulic fracturing with monotonic injection of high-pressure fluids, in fatigue hydraulic fracturing, the fluid is injected in pressure cycles with increasing target pressure, separated by depressurization phases for relaxing the crack tip stresses. During pressurization phases, the target pressure level is modified by pulse hydraulic fracturing generated with a second pump system. This combination of two pumps with multiple-flow rates may allow a more complex fracture pattern to be designed, with arresting and branching fractures, forming a broader fracture process zone. Small-scale laboratory fluid-injection tests on granite cores and intermediate-scale fluid-injection experiments in a hard rock underground test siteare described. At laboratory scale, cyclic fluid-injection tests with acoustic emission analysis arereported with subsequent X-ray CT fracture pattern analysis. At intermediate scale, in a controlled underground experiment at constant depth with well-known stress state in granitic rock, we test advanced fluid-injection schemes. The goal is to optimize the fracture network and mitigate larger seismic events. General findings in granitic rock, independent of scale, are summarized. First, the fracture breakdown pressure in fatigue hydraulic testing is lower than that in the conventional hydraulic fracturing. Second, compared to continuous injection, the magnitude of the largest induced seismic event seems to be systematically reduced by cyclic injection. Third, the fracture pattern in fatigue testing is different from that in the conventional injection tests at high pressures. Cyclic fracture patterns seem to result from chiefly generated low energy grain boundary cracks forming a wider process zone. Fourth, cyclic injection increases the permeability of the system. A combination of cyclic progressive and pulse pressurization leads to the best hydraulic performance of all schemes tested. One advantage of fatigue testing is the fact that this soft stimulation method can be applied in circumstances where the conventional stimulation might otherwise be abandoned based on site-specific seismic hazard estimates.Y