2,520 research outputs found

    Design of a reaper for use under Chinese conditions

    Get PDF

    U-Spin Tests of the Standard Model and New Physics

    Get PDF
    Within the standard model, a relation involving branching ratios and direct CP asymmetries holds for the B-decay pairs that are related by U-spin. The violation of this relation indicates new physics (NP). In this paper, we assume that the NP affects only the Delta S = 1 decays, and show that the NP operators are generally the same as those appearing in B -> pi K decays. The fit to the latest B -> pi K data shows that only one NP operator is sizeable. As a consequence, the relation is expected to be violated for only one decay pair: Bd -> K0 pi0 and Bs -> Kbar0 pi0.Comment: 12 pages, latex, no figures. References changed to follow MPL guidelines; info added about U-spin breaking and small NP strong phases; discussion added about final-state pi-K rescattering; analysis and conclusions unaltere

    Using Prospect Theory To Explain The Setting Of The Expected Rate Of Return On Pension Assets

    Get PDF
    Studies often use earnings management to explain the setting of assumed expected rate of return (ERRs) on pension assets in the defined benefit plans. In this paper, we argue that a manager’s risk attitude toward investment may have an impact on setting ERRs on pension assets. Prospect theory is a theory of decision making under risk and is used to explain firms’ behavior with regard to earnings management. We believe that prospect theory also can be used to explain firms’ setting of ERRs, which critically depends on managers’ expectations regarding risky investment. Empirical evidence shows that prospect theory can explain how firms set their ERRs on pension assets. We find that firms in the high-ERR group are risk-averters; that is, there is a positive relationship between risk and return. On the other hand, firms in the low-ERR group are risk-lovers and have an inverse risk-return relationship. Our findings contribute to the literature by suggesting that managers’ risk attitudes also affect the choice of ERR

    Determinants of Health-Promoting Lifestyle among Nurses in Taiwan

    Get PDF
    This two-phase study was undertaken to: (1) determine the relationships of self-efficacy, perceived health status, perceived social support, age, marital status, education, work shift, work setting, and years employed as a registered nurse (RN) to the practice of a health-promoting lifestyle; (2) determine the combination of predictor variables explaining the variance in the practice of a health-promoting lifestyle; and (3) investigate other personal and environmental cues and characteristics related to health-promoting lifestyles among nurses (N = 218) in Taiwan. Findings of the quantitative approach in Phase One indicated that a health-promoting lifestyle was significantly related to self-efficacy, perceived health status, perceived social support, age, and years employed as an RN. Four predictor variables, namely, self-efficacy, perceived health status, perceived social support, and working the evening shift, explained 40.4% of the variance in health-promoting lifestyle in this sample. Responses to open-ended questions revealed other factors that contribute to health-promoting lifestyle among the nurses. In Phase Two, nine subjects who scored very high and 10 who scored very low on the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) were interviewed regarding health beliefs, behaviors and factors influencing the practice of a health-promoting lifestyle. The interview data partly validate the findings from Phase One. In many situations, the subjects in Phase Two of this study cited predictor variables investigated such as social supports and rotating shift. Subjects also stressed the importance of energy, perseverance and partners in initiating and maintaining a health-promoting lifestyle. The interview data revealed other personal and environmental cues and characteristics of a health-promoting lifestyle. The high group had initiated less lifestyle changes, but maintained the changes longer than subjects in the low group. They also identified more enabling characteristics than did the low group. Subjects in the low group used more stress management techniques and identified more hindrances for lifestyle changes than the high HPLP group. A revised model was developed for testing in future studies
    • …
    corecore