8 research outputs found

    On the Convex Closure of the Graph of Modular Inversions

    Full text link
    In this paper we give upper and lower bounds as well as a heuristic estimate on the number of vertices of the convex closure of the set Gn={(a,b):a,b∈Z,ab≡1(modn),1≀a,b≀n−1}. G_n=\left\{(a,b) : a,b\in \Z, ab \equiv 1 \pmod{n}, 1\leq a,b\leq n-1\right\}. The heuristic is based on an asymptotic formula of R\'{e}nyi and Sulanke. After describing two algorithms to determine the convex closure, we compare the numeric results with the heuristic estimate. The numeric results do not agree with the heuristic estimate -- there are some interesting peculiarities for which we provide a heuristic explanation. We then describe some numerical work on the convex closure of the graph of random quadratic and cubic polynomials over Zn\mathbb{Z}_n. In this case the numeric results are in much closer agreement with the heuristic, which strongly suggests that the the curve xy=1(modn)xy=1\pmod{n} is ``atypical''.Comment: 33 pages, 14 figure

    TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access

    Get PDF
    Plant traits - the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants - determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem properties and their benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the basis for a vast area of research spanning from evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management, restoration, biogeography and earth system modelling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community worldwide. Increasingly, the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait‐based plant research, including the identification of data gaps and the subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we evaluate the extent of the trait data compiled in TRY and analyse emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits - almost complete coverage for ‘plant growth form’. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modelling are characterized by continuous intraspecific variation and trait–environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment. Despite unprecedented data coverage, we observe a humbling lack of completeness and representativeness of these continuous traits in many aspects. We, therefore, conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements. This can only be achieved in collaboration with other initiatives

    TRY plant trait database - enhanced coverage and open access

    No full text
    10.1111/gcb.14904GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY261119-18
    corecore