Clinical and Radiological Features Between Patients with Stable COPD from Plateau and Flatlands: A Comparative Study

Zhihan Jiang,1,* Xiaosen Wang,1,* Lijiao Zhang,1,* Drolma Yangzom,2,* Yanping Ning,2 Baiyan Su,3,4 Meijiao Li,5 Meilang ChuTso,2 Yahong Chen,1,6 Ying Liang,1,2,6 Yongchang Sun1,6 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tibet Autonomous Region People’s Hospital, Lhasa, 850000, People’s Republic of China; 3Radiology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China; 4Radiology Department, Tibet Autonomous Region People’s Hospital, Lhasa, 850000, People’s Republic of China; 5Radiology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, People’s Republic of China; 6Research Center for Chronic Airway Diseases, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100083, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Ying Liang; Yongchang Sun, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, North Garden Road 49, Haidian District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 138 1096 4766 ; +86 139 1097 9132, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: COPD patients living in Tibet are exposed to specific environments and different risk factors and probably have different characteristics of COPD from those living in flatlands. We aimed to describe the distinction between stable COPD patients permanently residing at the Tibet plateau and those in flatlands.Methods: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study that enrolled stable COPD patients from Tibet Autonomous Region People’s Hospital (Plateau Group) and Peking University Third Hospital (Flatland Group), respectively. Their demographic information, clinical features, spirometry test, blood routine and high-resolution chest CT were collected and evaluated.Results: A total of 182 stable COPD patients (82 from plateau and 100 from flatland) were consecutively enrolled. Compared to those in flatlands, patients in plateau had a higher proportion of females, more biomass fuel use and less tobacco exposure. CAT score and frequency of exacerbation in the past year were higher in plateau patients. The blood eosinophil count was lower in plateau patients, with fewer patients having an eosinophil count ≥ 300/μL. On CT examination, the proportions of previous pulmonary tuberculosis and bronchiectasis were higher in plateau patients, but emphysema was less common and milder. The ratio of diameters of pulmonary artery to aorta ≥ 1 was more often in plateau patients.Conclusion: Patients with COPD living at Tibet Plateau had a heavier respiratory burden, lower blood eosinophil count, less emphysema but more bronchiectasis and pulmonary hypertension. Biomass exposure and previous tuberculosis were more common in these patients.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, plateau, phenotype, computed tomography, emphysem

Parasites and vectors carry no passport: how to fund cross-border and regional efforts to achieve malaria elimination

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tremendous progress has been made in the last ten years in reducing morbidity and mortality caused by malaria, in part because of increases in global funding for malaria control and elimination. Today, many countries are striving for malaria elimination. However, a major challenge is the neglect of cross-border and regional initiatives in malaria control and elimination. This paper seeks to better understand Global Fund support for multi-country initiatives.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Documents and proposals were extracted and reviewed from two main sources, the Global Fund website and Aidspan.org. Documents and reports from the Global Fund Technical Review Panel, Board, and Secretariat documents such as guidelines and proposal templates were reviewed to establish the type of policies enacted and guidance provided from the Global Fund on multi-country initiatives and applications. From reviewing this information, the researchers created 29 variables according to eight dimensions to use in a review of Round 10 applications. All Round 10 multi-country applications (for HIV, malaria and tuberculosis) and all malaria multi-country applications (6) from Rounds 1 – 10 were extracted from the Global Fund website. A blind review was conducted of Round 10 applications using the 29 variables as a framework, followed by a review of four of the six successful malaria multi-country grant applications from Rounds 1 – 10.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>During Rounds 3 – 10 of the Global Fund, only 5.8% of grants submitted were for multi-country initiatives. Out of 83 multi-country proposals submitted, 25.3% were approved by the Technical Review Panel (TRP) for funding, compared to 44.9% of single-country applications. The majority of approved multi-country applications were for HIV (76.2%), followed by malaria (19.0%), then tuberculosis (4.8%). TRP recommendations resulted in improvements to application forms, although guidance was generally vague. The in-depth review of Round 10 multi-country proposals showed that applicants described their projects in one of two ways: a regional ‘network approach’ by which benefits are derived from economies of scale or from enhanced opportunities for mutual support and learning or the development of common policies and approaches; or a ‘cross-border’ approach for enabling activities to be more effectively delivered towards border-crossing populations or vectors. In Round 10, only those with a ‘network approach’ were recommended for funding. The Global Fund has only ever approved six malaria multi-country applications. Four approved applications stated strong arguments for a multi-country initiative, combining both ‘cross-border’ and ‘network’ approaches.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>With the cancellation of Round 11 and the proposal that the Global Fund adopt a more targeted and strategic approach to funding, the time is opportune for the Global Fund to develop a clear consensus about the key factors and criteria for funding malaria specific multi-country initiatives. This study found that currently there was a lack of guidance on the key features that a successful multi-country proposal needs to be approved and that applications directed towards the ‘network’ approach were most successful in Round 10. This type of multi-country proposal may favour other diseases such as HIV, whereas the need for malaria control and elimination is different, focusing on cross-border coordination and delivery of interventions to specific groups. The Global Fund should seek to address these issues and give better guidance to countries and regions and investigate disease-specific calls for multi-country and regional applications.</p

Human movement data for malaria control and elimination strategic planning

ABSTRACT: Recent increases in funding for malaria control have led to the reduction in transmission in many malaria endemic countries, prompting the national control programmes of 36 malaria endemic countries to set elimination targets. Accounting for human population movement (HPM) in planning for control, elimination and post-elimination surveillance is important, as evidenced by previous elimination attempts that were undermined by the reintroduction of malaria through HPM. Strategic control and elimination planning, therefore, requires quantitative information on HPM patterns and the translation of these into parasite dispersion. HPM patterns and the risk of malaria vary substantially across spatial and temporal scales, demographic and socioeconomic sub-groups, and motivation for travel, so multiple data sets are likely required for quantification of movement. While existing studies based on mobile phone call record data combined with malaria transmission maps have begun to address within-country HPM patterns, other aspects remain poorly quantified despite their importance in accurately gauging malaria movement patterns and building control and detection strategies, such as cross-border HPM, demographic and socioeconomic stratification of HPM patterns, forms of transport, personal malaria protection and other factors that modify malaria risk. A wealth of data exist to aid filling these gaps, which, when combined with spatial data on transport infrastructure, traffic and malaria transmission, can answer relevant questions to guide strategic planning. This review aims to (i) discuss relevant types of HPM across spatial and temporal scales, (ii) document where datasets exist to quantify HPM, (iii) highlight where data gaps remain and (iv) briefly put forward methods for integrating these datasets in a Geographic Information System (GIS) framework for analysing and modelling human population and Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection movements