FKBP (FK506 Binding Protein)

In the 70s, after a decade from the purification of cyclosporine, a selective immunosuppressant agent and potent tool in transplantation medicine, a novel molecule was purified from bacteria Streptomyces tsukubaensis. This molecule, called FK506, showed the same selective immunosuppressant action as cyclosporine but was 10 to 100 fold more potent. In an attempt to clarify the molecular mechanism through which the new drug exerted such a selective effect on T-cells activation, two laboratories identified the cytosolic receptor for FK506. This so-called FK506 binding protein (FKBP) was purified from bovine thymus, human spleen, and Jurkat T-cell line. The isolated FKBP had an approximate molecular mass of 14 kDa and showed an isomerase activity similar to the recently purified cyclosporine-binding protein, cyclophilin, but, it was inhibited by FK506 and rapamycin but not cyclosporine. The subsequent cloning of FKBP gene revealed that FKBP and cyclophilin had dissimilar sequences in spite of their common enzymatic activity. The identified FKBP gene encoded for a protein of 108 aminoacids with a relative molecular mass of 11,819. For this reason, the progenitor of this nascent class of proteins was later known as FKBP12. The subsequent studies showed that FKBP12 was just a member of a ubiquitous and evolutionarily conserved sub-family of proteins which differ from each other in their molecular weight and structure. All FKBPs share a highly conserved domain, termed “FK-12 like domain”, capable of binding to FK506 and exerting isomerase properties, i.e. interconversion from cis-to-trans and trans-to-cis of peptide bonds involving proline, on protein substrates. A schematic historical background of the 17 FKBPs so far identified is shown. A general overview of FKBP structure, function and eventually associated disease is given in this monograph, with the order of proteins following the chronology of discovery

Zebrafish disease models in drug discovery: from preclinical modelling to clinical trials

Numerous drug treatments that have recently entered the clinic or clinical trials have their genesis in zebrafish. Zebrafish are well established for their contribution to developmental biology and have now emerged as a powerful preclinical model for human disease, as their disease characteristics, aetiology and progression, and molecular mechanisms are clinically relevant and highly conserved. Zebrafish respond to small molecules and drug treatments at physiologically relevant dose ranges and, when combined with cell-specific or tissue-specific reporters and gene editing technologies, drug activity can be studied at single-cell resolution within the complexity of a whole animal, across tissues and over an extended timescale. These features enable high-throughput and high-content phenotypic drug screening, repurposing of available drugs for personalized and compassionate use, and even the development of new drug classes. Often, drugs and drug leads explored in zebrafish have an inter-organ mechanism of action and would otherwise not be identified through targeted screening approaches. Here, we discuss how zebrafish is an important model for drug discovery, the process of how these discoveries emerge and future opportunities for maximizing zebrafish potential in medical discoveries

Functions of the Hsp90-binding FKBP Immunophilins.

Hsp90 functionally interacts with a broad array of client proteins, but in every case examined Hsp90 is accompanied by one or more co-chaperones. One class of co-chaperone contains a tetratricopeptide repeat domain that targets the co-chaperone to the C-terminal region of Hsp90. Within this class are Hsp90-binding peptidylprolyl isomerases, most of which belong to the FK506-binding protein (FKBP) family. Despite the common association of FKBP co-chaperones with Hsp90, it is now clear that the client protein influences, and is influenced by, the particular FKBP bound to Hsp90. Examples include Xap2 in aryl hydrocarbon receptor complexes and FKBP52 in steroid receptor complexes. In this chapter, we discuss the known functional roles played by FKBP co-chaperones and, where possible, relate distinctive functions to structural differences between FKBP members