Comparative Performance of Deep Learning and Radiologists for the Diagnosis and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at MRI:A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL)-based models have demonstrated an ability to automatically diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) on MRI scans and are regularly reported to approach expert performance. The aim of this work was to systematically review the literature comparing deep learning (DL) systems to radiologists in order to evaluate the comparative performance of current state-of-the-art deep learning models and radiologists. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Studies investigating DL models for diagnosing clinically significant (cs) PCa on MRI were included. The quality and risk of bias of each study were assessed using the checklist for AI in medical imaging (CLAIM) and QUADAS-2, respectively. Patient level and lesion-based diagnostic performance were separately evaluated by comparing the sensitivity achieved by DL and radiologists at an identical specificity and the false positives per patient, respectively. RESULTS: The final selection consisted of eight studies with a combined 7337 patients. The median study quality with CLAIM was 74.1% (IQR: 70.6-77.6). DL achieved an identical patient-level performance to the radiologists for PI-RADS ≥ 3 (both 97.7%, SD = 2.1%). DL had a lower sensitivity for PI-RADS ≥ 4 (84.2% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.43). The sensitivity of DL for lesion localization was also between 2% and 12.5% lower than that of the radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: DL models for the diagnosis of csPCa on MRI appear to approach the performance of experts but currently have a lower sensitivity compared to experienced radiologists. There is a need for studies with larger datasets and for validation on external data

Serum IGF-1 Affects Skeletal Acquisition in a Temporal and Compartment-Specific Manner

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) plays a critical role in the development of the growing skeleton by establishing both longitudinal and transverse bone accrual. IGF-1 has also been implicated in the maintenance of bone mass during late adulthood and aging, as decreases in serum IGF-1 levels appear to correlate with decreases in bone mineral density (BMD). Although informative, mouse models to date have been unable to separate the temporal effects of IGF-1 depletion on skeletal development. To address this problem, we performed a skeletal characterization of the inducible LID mouse (iLID), in which serum IGF-1 levels are depleted at selected ages. We found that depletion of serum IGF-1 in male iLID mice prior to adulthood (4 weeks) decreased trabecular bone architecture and significantly reduced transverse cortical bone properties (Ct.Ar, Ct.Th) by 16 weeks (adulthood). Likewise, depletion of serum IGF-1 in iLID males at 8 weeks of age, resulted in significantly reduced transverse cortical bone properties (Ct.Ar, Ct.Th) by 32 weeks (late adulthood), but had no effect on trabecular bone architecture. In contrast, depletion of serum IGF-1 after peak bone acquisition (at 16 weeks) resulted in enhancement of trabecular bone architecture, but no significant changes in cortical bone properties by 32 weeks as compared to controls. These results indicate that while serum IGF-1 is essential for bone accrual during the postnatal growth phase, depletion of IGF-1 after peak bone acquisition (16 weeks) is compartment-specific and does not have a detrimental effect on cortical bone mass in the older adult mouse

Radiologist-patient consultation of imaging findings after neck ultrasonography:An opportunity to practice value-based radiology

Objective: To investigate how patients experience a radiologist-patient consultation of imaging findings directly after neck ultrasonography (US), and how much time this consumes. Materials and methods: This prospective randomized study included 109 consecutive patients who underwent neck US, of whom 44 had a radiologist-patient consultation of US results directly after the examination, and 65 who had not. Results: The median ratings of all healthcare quality metrics (friendliness of the radiologist, explanation of the radiologist, skill of the radiologist, radiologist's concern for comfort during the examination, radiologist's concern for patient questions/worries, overall rating of the examination, and likelihood of recommending the examination) were either good/high or very good/very high, without any significant differences between both patient groups. Patients who did not discuss the US results with the radiologist, were significantly more worried during the examination (P = 0.040) and had significantly higher anxiety levels after completion of the US examination (P = 0.027) than patients who discussed the US results with the radiologist. Fifty-one out of 55 responding patients (92.7%) indicated a radiologist-patient consultation of US results to be important. The median duration of US examinations that included a radiologist-patient consultation of US results was 7.57 min (range: 5.15-12.10 min), while the median duration of US examinations without a radiologist-patient consultation of US results was 7.34 min (range: 3.45-14.32 min), without any significant difference (P = 0.637). Conclusion: A radiologist-patient consultation of imaging findings after neck US decreases patient anxiety, is desired by most patients, and does not significantly prolong total examination time

Focused view CT angiography for selective visualization of stroke related arteries:technical feasibility

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the technical feasibility of focused view CTA for the selective visualization of stroke related arteries.METHODS: A total of 141 CTA examinations for acute ischemic stroke evaluation were divided into a set of 100 cases to train a deep learning algorithm (dubbed "focused view CTA") that selectively extracts brain (including intracranial arteries) and extracranial arteries, and a test set of 41 cases. The visibility of anatomic structures at focused view and unmodified CTA was assessed using the following scoring system: 5 = completely visible, diagnostically sufficient; 4 = nearly completely visible, diagnostically sufficient; 3 = incompletely visible, barely diagnostically sufficient; 2 = hardly visible, diagnostically insufficient; 1 = not visible, diagnostically insufficient.RESULTS: At focused view CTA, median scores for the aortic arch, subclavian arteries, common carotid arteries, C1, C6, and C7 segments of the internal carotid arteries, V4 segment of the vertebral arteries, basilar artery, cerebellum including cerebellar arteries, cerebrum including cerebral arteries, and dural venous sinuses, were all 4. Median scores for the C2 to C5 segments of the internal carotid arteries, and V1 to V3 segments of the vertebral arteries ranged between 3 and 2. At unmodified CTA, median score for all above-mentioned anatomic structures was 5, which was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.0001) than that at focused view CTA.CONCLUSION: Focused view CTA shows promise for the selective visualization of stroke-related arteries. Further improvements should focus on more accurately visualizing the smaller and tortuous internal carotid and vertebral artery segments close to bone.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Focused view CTA may speed up image interpretation time for LVO detection and may potentially be used as a tool to study the clinical relevance of incidental findings in future prospective long-term follow-up studies.KEY POINTS: • A deep learning-based algorithm ("focused view CTA") was developed to selectively visualize relevant structures for acute ischemic stroke evaluation at CTA. • The elimination of unrequested anatomic background information was complete in all cases. • Focused view CTA may be used to study the clinical relevance of incidental findings.</p

Point-of-care ultrasonography:Downstream utilization of and diagnostic (dis)agreements with additional cross-sectional imaging

OBJECTIVES: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS), defined as ultrasonography (US) performed and interpreted by the clinician, is increasingly performed. This study aimed to determine the frequency of and reasons why clinicians of the emergency department request cross-sectional imaging after POCUS and how often radiologists experience diagnostic (dis)agreements. METHODS: This retrospective study included a consecutive series of 503 patients who underwent POCUS at the emergency department of a tertiary care center. RESULTS: Downstream cross-sectional imaging was performed in 77 (15.3%) of 503 POCUS examinations. Reasons for additional cross-sectional imaging were, in order of decreasing frequency: suspicion of pathology that was not assessed with POCUS in 46 cases (59.7%), confirmation of conclusive POCUS findings in 21 cases (27.3%), inconclusive POCUS (i.e. insufficient visualization of the structure of interest to make a diagnosis, despite an attempt of the POCUS operator) in 7 cases (9.6%), a combination of inconclusive POCUS and suspicion of pathology that was not assessed with POCUS in 2 cases (2.6%), and clarification of incidental findings on POCUS in 1 case (1.3%). In the 21 cases that underwent additional cross-sectional imaging to confirm POCUS findings, POCUS agreed with additional cross-sectional imaging in 19 (90.5%) and disagreed in 2 (9.5%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of POCUS appears to not cause any considerable downstream overutilization of cross-sectional imaging. In addition, radiologists experience few diagnostic disagreements when asked to perform second opinion cross-sectional imaging. Future studies with more homogeneous datasets in terms of POCUS operators are required to confirm our results

Focused view CT angiography for selective visualization of stroke related arteries:technical feasibility

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the technical feasibility of focused view CTA for the selective visualization of stroke related arteries.METHODS: A total of 141 CTA examinations for acute ischemic stroke evaluation were divided into a set of 100 cases to train a deep learning algorithm (dubbed "focused view CTA") that selectively extracts brain (including intracranial arteries) and extracranial arteries, and a test set of 41 cases. The visibility of anatomic structures at focused view and unmodified CTA was assessed using the following scoring system: 5 = completely visible, diagnostically sufficient; 4 = nearly completely visible, diagnostically sufficient; 3 = incompletely visible, barely diagnostically sufficient; 2 = hardly visible, diagnostically insufficient; 1 = not visible, diagnostically insufficient.RESULTS: At focused view CTA, median scores for the aortic arch, subclavian arteries, common carotid arteries, C1, C6, and C7 segments of the internal carotid arteries, V4 segment of the vertebral arteries, basilar artery, cerebellum including cerebellar arteries, cerebrum including cerebral arteries, and dural venous sinuses, were all 4. Median scores for the C2 to C5 segments of the internal carotid arteries, and V1 to V3 segments of the vertebral arteries ranged between 3 and 2. At unmodified CTA, median score for all above-mentioned anatomic structures was 5, which was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.0001) than that at focused view CTA.CONCLUSION: Focused view CTA shows promise for the selective visualization of stroke-related arteries. Further improvements should focus on more accurately visualizing the smaller and tortuous internal carotid and vertebral artery segments close to bone.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Focused view CTA may speed up image interpretation time for LVO detection and may potentially be used as a tool to study the clinical relevance of incidental findings in future prospective long-term follow-up studies.KEY POINTS: • A deep learning-based algorithm ("focused view CTA") was developed to selectively visualize relevant structures for acute ischemic stroke evaluation at CTA. • The elimination of unrequested anatomic background information was complete in all cases. • Focused view CTA may be used to study the clinical relevance of incidental findings.</p

Diagnostic errors in clinical FDG-PET/CT

Purpose: To determine the frequency, types, and determinants of diagnostic errors in clinical FDG-PET/CT, based on addenda to the original report. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 4,099 consecutive clinical FDG-PET/CT scans with corresponding reports that were made at a tertiary care center in an 18-month period. FDG-PET/CT reports were scrutinized for the presence of an addendum enclosing a diagnostic error. Results: 90 of 4,099 FDG-PET/CT reports (2.2%) contained an addendum enclosing a diagnostic error. The distribution of perceptual and cognitive errors among these 90 diagnostic errors was 54 (60.0%)/36 (40.0%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only low-dose FDG-PET/CT combined with concomitantly acquired and interpreted full-dose contrast-enhanced CT remained as significantly and independently associated with the presence of a diagnostic error, relative to low-dose FDG-PET/CT without concomitantly acquired and interpreted full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (odds ratio: 2.79 [95% confidence interval: 1.61-4.851, P <0.001). Patient age, gender, hospital status, indication for FDG-PET/CT scanning, single vs. double reading (i.e. two medical imaging specialists), reader experience, and reading by a nuclear medicine physician only vs. reading by both a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist, were not significantly and independently associated with the presence of a diagnostic error. Conclusion: Diagnostic errors in clinical FDG-PET/CT based on addenda to the original report are relatively infrequent, though certainly non-negligible. Perceptual errors are slightly more frequent than cognitive errors. The availability of a concomitantly acquired and interpreted full-dose contrast-enhanced CT seems to increase diagnostic error rate. These data can be used for quality improvement and benchmarking purposes

Recommendations in Second Opinion Reports of Neurologic Head and Neck Imaging:Frequency, Referring Clinicians? Compliance, and Diagnostic Yield

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Second opinion reports of neurologic head and neck imaging are requested with increased regularity, and they may contain a recommendation to the clinician. Our aim was to investigate the frequency and determinants of the presence of a recommendation and the adherence by the referring physician to the recommendation in a second opinion neurology head and neck imaging report and the diagnostic yield of these recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 994 consecutive second opinion reports of neurology head and neck imaging examinations performed at a tertiary care center. RESULTS: Of the 994 second opinion reports, 12.2% (121/994) contained a recommendation. An oncologic imaging indication was significantly (P = .030) associated with a lower chance of a recommendation in the second opinion report (OR = .67; 95% CI, 0.46?0.96). Clinicians followed 65.7% (88/134) of the recommendations. None of the investigated variables (patient age, sex, hospitalization status, indication for the second opinion report, experience of the radiologist who signed the second opinion report, strength of the recommendation, and whether the recommendation was made due to apparent quality issues of the original examination) were significantly associated with the compliance of the referring physician to this recommendation. The 134 individual recommendations eventually led to the establishment of 52 (38.2%) benign diagnoses and 28 (20.6%) malignant diagnoses, while no definitive diagnosis could be established in 56 (41.2%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are relatively common in second opinion reports of neurology head and neck imaging examinations, though less for oncologic indications. They are mostly followed by requesting physicians, thus affecting patient management. In most cases, they also lead to the establishment of a diagnosis, hence adding value to patient care

Focused view CT angiography for selective visualization of stroke related arteries:technical feasibility

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the technical feasibility of focused view CTA for the selective visualization of stroke related arteries.METHODS: A total of 141 CTA examinations for acute ischemic stroke evaluation were divided into a set of 100 cases to train a deep learning algorithm (dubbed "focused view CTA") that selectively extracts brain (including intracranial arteries) and extracranial arteries, and a test set of 41 cases. The visibility of anatomic structures at focused view and unmodified CTA was assessed using the following scoring system: 5 = completely visible, diagnostically sufficient; 4 = nearly completely visible, diagnostically sufficient; 3 = incompletely visible, barely diagnostically sufficient; 2 = hardly visible, diagnostically insufficient; 1 = not visible, diagnostically insufficient.RESULTS: At focused view CTA, median scores for the aortic arch, subclavian arteries, common carotid arteries, C1, C6, and C7 segments of the internal carotid arteries, V4 segment of the vertebral arteries, basilar artery, cerebellum including cerebellar arteries, cerebrum including cerebral arteries, and dural venous sinuses, were all 4. Median scores for the C2 to C5 segments of the internal carotid arteries, and V1 to V3 segments of the vertebral arteries ranged between 3 and 2. At unmodified CTA, median score for all above-mentioned anatomic structures was 5, which was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.0001) than that at focused view CTA.CONCLUSION: Focused view CTA shows promise for the selective visualization of stroke-related arteries. Further improvements should focus on more accurately visualizing the smaller and tortuous internal carotid and vertebral artery segments close to bone.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Focused view CTA may speed up image interpretation time for LVO detection and may potentially be used as a tool to study the clinical relevance of incidental findings in future prospective long-term follow-up studies.KEY POINTS: • A deep learning-based algorithm ("focused view CTA") was developed to selectively visualize relevant structures for acute ischemic stroke evaluation at CTA. • The elimination of unrequested anatomic background information was complete in all cases. • Focused view CTA may be used to study the clinical relevance of incidental findings.</p