22,663 research outputs found

    Comparison of a reverse-transverse cross pin technique with a same side cross pin type II external skeletal fixator in 89 dogs

    Get PDF
    The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel reverse-transverse cross pin insertion technique could increase the stability of type II external skeletal fixators (ESF) in dogs compared with an alternate, same side cross pin ESF. Reverse-transverse cross pin technique and type II ESFs same side cross pin technique were applied and compared among subjects. Two of 42 ESFs (4.8%) applied with the reverse-transverse cross pin technique and 39 of 47 ESFs (83%) applied with the same side cross pin technique were subjectively unstable at the time of fixator removal (P < 0.001). The same side cross pin ESFs had significantly more pin tract new bone formation than the reverse-transverse ESFs (P = 0.038). In summary, this approach may provide a method of treating a variety of musculoskeletal conditions and soft tissue cases, which reverse-transverse cross pin ESFs are tolerated in dogs for a variety of conditions

    Decoherence of flux qubits due to 1/f flux noise

    Full text link
    We have investigated decoherence in Josephson-junction flux qubits. Based on the measurements of decoherence at various bias conditions, we discriminate contributions of different noise sources. In particular, we present a Gaussian decay function of the echo signal as evidence of dephasing due to 1/f1/f flux noise whose spectral density is evaluated to be about (10βˆ’6Ξ¦0)2(10^{-6} \Phi_0)^2/Hz at 1 Hz. We also demonstrate that at an optimal bias condition where the noise sources are well decoupled the coherence observed in the echo measurement is mainly limited by energy relaxation of the qubit.Comment: 4 pages, error in Fig.4 corrected, to appear in PR

    Charmed Baryon Weak Decays with SU(3) Flavor Symmetry

    Full text link
    We study the semileptonic and non-leptonic charmed baryon decays with SU(3)SU(3) flavor symmetry, where the charmed baryons can be Bc=(Ξc0,Ξc+,Ξ›c+){\bf B}_{c}=(\Xi_c^0,\Xi_c^+,\Lambda_c^+), Bcβ€²=(Ξ£c(++,+,0),Ξcβ€²(+,0),Ξ©c0){\bf B}'_{c}=(\Sigma_c^{(++,+,0)},\Xi_{c}^{\prime(+,0)},\Omega_c^0), Bcc=(Ξcc++,Ξcc+,Ξ©cc+){\bf B}_{cc}=(\Xi_{cc}^{++},\Xi_{cc}^+,\Omega_{cc}^+), or Bccc=Ξ©ccc++{\bf B}_{ccc}=\Omega^{++}_{ccc}. With Bn(β€²){\bf B}_n^{(\prime)} denoted as the baryon octet (decuplet), we find that the Bcβ†’Bnβ€²β„“+Ξ½β„“{\bf B}_{c}\to {\bf B}'_n\ell^+\nu_\ell decays are forbidden, while the Ξ©c0β†’Ξ©βˆ’β„“+Ξ½β„“\Omega_c^0\to \Omega^-\ell^+\nu_\ell, Ξ©cc+β†’Ξ©c0β„“+Ξ½β„“\Omega_{cc}^+\to\Omega_c^0\ell^+\nu_\ell, and Ξ©ccc++β†’Ξ©cc+β„“+Ξ½β„“\Omega_{ccc}^{++}\to \Omega_{cc}^+\ell^+\nu_\ell decays are the only existing Cabibbo-allowed modes for Bcβ€²β†’Bnβ€²β„“+Ξ½β„“{\bf B}'_{c}\to {\bf B}'_n\ell^+\nu_\ell, Bccβ†’Bcβ€²β„“+Ξ½β„“{\bf B}_{cc}\to {\bf B}'_c\ell^+\nu_\ell, and Bcccβ†’Bcc(β€²)β„“+Ξ½β„“{\bf B}_{ccc}\to {\bf B}_{cc}^{(\prime)}\ell^+\nu_\ell, respectively. We predict the rarely studied Bcβ†’Bn(β€²)M{\bf B}_{c}\to {\bf B}_n^{(\prime)}M decays, such as B(Ξc0β†’Ξ›0KΛ‰0,β€‰Ξžc+β†’Ξž0Ο€+)=(8.3Β±0.9,8.0Β±4.1)Γ—10βˆ’3{\cal B}(\Xi_c^0\to\Lambda^0\bar K^0,\,\Xi_c^+\to\Xi^0\pi^+)=(8.3\pm 0.9,8.0\pm 4.1)\times 10^{-3} and B(Ξ›c+β†’Ξ”++Ο€βˆ’,β€‰Ξžc0β†’Ξ©βˆ’K+)=(5.5Β±1.3,4.8Β±0.5)Γ—10βˆ’3{\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+\to \Delta^{++}\pi^-,\,\Xi_c^0\to\Omega^- K^+)=(5.5\pm 1.3,4.8\pm 0.5)\times 10^{-3}. For the observation, the doubly and triply charmed baryon decays of Ξ©cc+β†’Ξžc+KΛ‰0\Omega_{cc}^{+}\to \Xi_c^+\bar K^0, Ξcc++β†’(Ξc+Ο€+\Xi_{cc}^{++}\to (\Xi_c^+\pi^+, Ξ£c++KΛ‰0)\Sigma_c^{++}\bar K^0), and Ξ©ccc++β†’(Ξcc++KΛ‰0,Ξ©cc+Ο€+,Ξc+D+)\Omega_{ccc}^{++}\to (\Xi_{cc}^{++}\bar K^0,\Omega_{cc}^+\pi^+,\Xi_c^+ D^+) are the favored Cabibbo-allowed decays, which are accessible to the BESIII and LHCb experiments.Comment: 29 pages, no figure, a typo in the table correcte
    • …
    corecore