Type I interferon gene expression in antiphospholipid syndrome: Pathogenetic, clinical and therapeutic implications

Type I Interferon gene expression has been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of several systemic autoimmune disorders, paving the way for its potential use as a surrogate marker or a therapeutic tool. While the concept of type I interferon signature and its correlation with clinical phenotypes and disease activity, along with anti-interferon targeted therapy have been vastly investigated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, there is a paucity of data concerning antiphospholipid syndrome patients. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the pathogenetic and clinical implications of type I interferon expression in antiphospholipid syndrome and discuss the therapeutic possibility of targeting molecules along the interferon signaling pathway. A number of recent studies have shown a type I interferon gene expression induction in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome via the plasmacytoid dendritic cell pathway, toll like receptors (TLRs) such as TLR7 and TLR9, anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibody-mediated neutrophil activation and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) release in a TLR4-dependent fashion, and a subsequent B cell and plasmablast activation. An association between type I interferon expression and several demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics including age, gender, pregnancy complications such as eclampsia, anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibodies, and a negative correlation with hydroxychloroquine and/or statin use, has been shown. Correlation of high interferon scores to worse outcomes in prospective studies could direct the initiation for a prompt treatment in high-risk populations. Potential therapeutic approaches targeting type I interferon production and signaling pathway components might include anti-interferon or interferon receptor monoclonal antibodies, or an interferon based therapeutic vaccine as was indicated from previous systemic lupus erythematosus studies, TLR inhibitors including hydroxychloroquine and anti-TLR antibodies, plasmacytoid dendritic cell inhibition, adenosine-receptor agonists, and plasmablast targeting treatments. Well-designed studies are needed to further assess the immunomodulatory potential of the above targets for therapeutic intervention in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. © 2019 Elsevier Lt

Management of Non-criteria Manifestations in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Purpose of the Review: To review the available evidence on the management of a variety of non-criteria manifestations in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), including valvular disease, alveolar hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, APS nephropathy, skin ulcers, livedo reticularis, cognitive dysfunction, and epilepsy. Recent Findings: Current treatment relies on low-level evidence and mainly on expert consensus due to the rarity and the heterogeneity of non-criteria APS manifestations and the diversity in management approaches. Conventional anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet APS treatment do not adequately control most of non-criteria manifestations. Increasing knowledge about the contribution of inflammatory in addition to, or independently of, thrombotic mechanisms in non-criteria APS manifestations provides insight into the potential effect of novel therapies targeting B-cells, mammalian target of rapamycin, neutrophil, and complement or interferon pathways. Summary: Existing evidence is limited by lack of high-quality studies. Better understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical phenotypes of APS and well-designed prospective studies of homogenous populations are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of non-criteria APS manifestations. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies

Background: Although several international guidelines recommend early over late intubation of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this issue is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect (if any) of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 by carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched, while references and preprint servers were explored, for relevant articles up to December 26, 2020, to identify studies which reported on mortality and/or morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing early versus late intubation. “Early” was defined as intubation within 24 h from intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while “late” as intubation at any time after 24 h of ICU admission. All-cause mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) were the primary outcomes of the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR), pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020222147). Results: A total of 12 studies, involving 8944 critically ill patients with COVID-19, were included. There was no statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality between patients undergoing early versus late intubation (3981 deaths; 45.4% versus 39.1%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.15, p = 0.08). This was also the case for duration of MV (1892 patients; MD − 0.58 days, 95% CI − 3.06 to 1.89 days, p = 0.65). In a sensitivity analysis using an alternate definition of early/late intubation, intubation without versus with a prior trial of high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was still not associated with a statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality (1128 deaths; 48.9% versus 42.5%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.25, p = 0.08). Conclusions: The synthesized evidence suggests that timing of intubation may have no effect on mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients with COVID-19. These results might justify a wait-and-see approach, which may lead to fewer intubations. Relevant guidelines may therefore need to be updated. © 2021, The Author(s)

Association between timing of intubation and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: A meta-analysis

Purpose: Optimal timing of intubation is controversial. We attempted to investigate the association between timing of intubation and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. Methods: PubMed was systematically searched for studies reporting on mortality of critically ill patients undergoing early versus late intubation. Studies involving patients with new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) were excluded because a relevant meta-analysis has been published. “Early” intubation was defined according to the authors of the included studies. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021284850). Results: In total, 27 studies involving 15,441 intubated patients (11,943 early, 3498 late) were included. All-cause mortality was lower in patients undergoing early versus late intubation (7338 deaths; 45.8% versus 53.5%; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.97; p = 0.001). This was also the case in the sensitivity analysis of studies defining “early” as intubation within 24 h from admission in the intensive care unit (6279 deaths; 45.8% versus 53.6%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.98; p = 0.005). Conclusion: Avoiding late intubation may be associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients without COVID-19. © 2022 Elsevier Inc

Mortality of intubated patients with COVID-19 during first and subsequent waves: a meta-analysis involving 363,660 patients from 43 countries

Background: We attempted to investigate the change in mortality of intubated patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from first to subsequent waves across several countries. Methods: We pre-registered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO [Anonymized]. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and gray literature for observational studies reporting data on all-cause mortality of intubated patients with COVID-19 recruited both during first and subsequent waves of the pandemic. We considered studies published after 31 August 2020 up to 12 July 2021. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. We used a random effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: By incorporating data of 363,660 patients from 43 countries included in 28 studies, we found that all-cause mortality of intubated patients with COVID-19 increased from first to subsequent waves (from 62.2% to 72.6%; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85–0.94, p < 0.00001). This finding was independent of the geo-economic variation of the included studies and persisted in several pre-specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: The robust finding of this meta-analysis suggests that mortality of intubated patients with COVID-19 did not improve over time. Future research should target this group of patients to further optimize their management. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Effect of Early vs. Delayed or No Intubation on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19: An Observational Study

Background: Optimal timing of initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 is unknown. Thanks to early flattening of the epidemiological curve, ventilator demand in Greece was kept lower than supply throughout the pandemic, allowing for unbiased comparison of the outcomes of patients undergoing early intubation vs. delayed or no intubation. Methods: We conducted an observational study including all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 consecutively admitted in Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece between March 11, 2020 and April 15, 2020. Patients subsequently admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) were categorized into the “early intubation” vs. the “delayed or no intubation” group. The “delayed or no intubation” group included patients receiving non-rebreather mask for equal to or more than 24 h or high-flow nasal oxygen for any period of time or non-invasive mechanical ventilation for any period of time in an attempt to avoid intubation. The remaining intubated patients comprised the “early intubation” group. Results: During the study period, a total of 101 patients (37% female, median age 65 years) were admitted in the hospital. Fifty-nine patients (58% of the entire cohort) were exclusively hospitalized in general wards with a mortality of 3% and median length of stay of 7 days. Forty-two patients (19% female, median age 65 years) were admitted in the ICU; all with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Of those admitted in the ICU, 62% had at least one comorbidity and 14% were never intubated. Early intubation was not associated with higher ICU-mortality (21 vs. 33%), fewer ventilator-free days (3 vs. 2 days) or fewer ICU-free days than delayed or no intubation. Conclusions: A strategy of early intubation was not associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to delayed or no intubation. Given that early intubation may presumably reduce virus aerosolization, these results may justify further research with a randomized controlled trial. © Copyright © 2020 Siempos, Xourgia, Ntaidou, Zervakis, Magira, Kotanidou, Routsi and Zakynthinos

Assessment of adrenal response in patients with stable cirrhosis and ascites using different short Synacthen tests and definitions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The definition of relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. We investigated the serum and salivary cortisol (SalC) response after low-dose and standard-dose Synacthen test in patients with stable cirrhosis and ascites. METHODS: Ninety-five cirrhotic patients with ascites were prospectively evaluated from January 2014 to January 2018. Low-dose [adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH): 1 μg] and standard-dose (ACTH: 250 μg) Synacthen test were successively performed. Paired serum total and saliva cortisol were taken at baseline, 30 min (low-dose test) and 60 min (standard-dose test). Salivary and Δserum total cortisol criteria included post-ACTH SalC < 12.7 ng/ml and/or SalC increase <3 ng/ml and serum total cortisol increase <9 μg/dl, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of RAI varied according to the definition used. SalC-defined RAI was significantly more common after low-dose than standard-dose test (54.7% vs. 20%; P < 0.001). Δserum total cortisol-defined RAI was also significantly more frequent after low-dose than standard-dose test (66.3% vs. 24.2%; P < 0.001). Considering low-dose test/SalC criteria as reference diagnostic criteria, standard-dose/salivary and Δserum total cortisol criteria showed low specificity for RAI diagnosis (43.9% and 52.7%, respectively). Survival probability was significantly lower in patients with low-dose test/SalC-defined RAI compared to those without (53.8% vs. 79.1%; P = 0.01). SalC-defined RAI after low-dose test was significantly more common than that defined after standard-dose test (72.7% vs. 30.3%; P < 0.001) among patients who died. CONCLUSION: Low-dose test/SalC definition can identify RAI in about half of patients with stable cirrhosis and ascites and is associated with increased mortality. Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

Obesity and Diabetes: Pathophysiology of Obesity-Induced Hyperglycemia and Insulin Resistance

Insulin resistance along with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is some of the complications of obesity. Insulin resistance occurs due to the increased discharge of fatty acids, lipids, and other advancing factors, by the adipose tissue, leading to a myriad of complications. Several other substances namely glycerol, enzymes, inflammatory factors, and hormones are also involved in the overall mechanism. At the point when resistance towards insulin occurs, along with abnormally functioning β-cells, the overall burden of the inability to control elevated glucose levels in the blood ensues. Anomalies in β-cell are thus more critical in the development of T2D and its related symptoms. This information is encouraging investigation of the molecular and hereditary basis of the ailment and new ways to deal with its management and avoidance