6,849 research outputs found
Ideal Tightly Couple (t,m,n) Secret Sharing
As a fundamental cryptographic tool, (t,n)-threshold secret sharing
((t,n)-SS) divides a secret among n shareholders and requires at least t,
(t<=n), of them to reconstruct the secret. Ideal (t,n)-SSs are most desirable
in security and efficiency among basic (t,n)-SSs. However, an adversary, even
without any valid share, may mount Illegal Participant (IP) attack or
t/2-Private Channel Cracking (t/2-PCC) attack to obtain the secret in most
(t,n)-SSs.To secure ideal (t,n)-SSs against the 2 attacks, 1) the paper
introduces the notion of Ideal Tightly cOupled (t,m,n) Secret Sharing (or
(t,m,n)-ITOSS ) to thwart IP attack without Verifiable SS; (t,m,n)-ITOSS binds
all m, (m>=t), participants into a tightly coupled group and requires all
participants to be legal shareholders before recovering the secret. 2) As an
example, the paper presents a polynomial-based (t,m,n)-ITOSS scheme, in which
the proposed k-round Random Number Selection (RNS) guarantees that adversaries
have to crack at least symmetrical private channels among participants before
obtaining the secret. Therefore, k-round RNS enhances the robustness of
(t,m,n)-ITOSS against t/2-PCC attack to the utmost. 3) The paper finally
presents a generalized method of converting an ideal (t,n)-SS into a
(t,m,n)-ITOSS, which helps an ideal (t,n)-SS substantially improve the
robustness against the above 2 attacks
Empirical Evaluation of Test Coverage for Functional Programs
The correlation between test coverage and test effectiveness is important to justify the use of coverage in practice. Existing results on imperative programs mostly show that test coverage predicates effectiveness. However, since functional programs are usually structurally different from imperative ones, it is unclear whether the same result may be derived and coverage can be used as a prediction of effectiveness on functional programs. In this paper we report the first empirical study on the correlation between test coverage and test effectiveness on functional programs. We consider four types of coverage: as input coverages, statement/branch coverage and expression coverage, and as oracle coverages, count of assertions and checked coverage. We also consider two types of effectiveness: raw effectiveness and normalized effectiveness. Our results are twofold. (1) In general the findings on imperative programs still hold on functional programs, warranting the use of coverage in practice. (2) On specific coverage criteria, the results may be unexpected or different from the imperative ones, calling for further studies on functional programs
- β¦