13 research outputs found
Adsorption Structures and Energies of Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> Clusters on the Fe(110) and Fe<sub>3</sub>C(001) Surfaces
Spin-polarized
density functional theory computations have been
carried out to investigate the adsorption configurations of Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> (<i>n</i> = 1–7, 13) on
the most stable Fe(110) and Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(001) surfaces. On both
surfaces the adsorbed Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> clusters favor
aggregation over dispersion, and monolayer adsorption configurations
are more favored thermodynamically than the two-layer adsorbed structures
because of the stronger Fe–Cu interaction over the Cu–Cu
bonding. On the basis of the computed adsorption energies the Fe(110)
surface has stronger Cu affinity than the Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(001) surface,
in agreement with the experimental results. The Fe(110) surface also
has stronger Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> aggregation energies
and more pronounced charge transfer from surface to adsorbed Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> clusters than the Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(001) surface.
Different Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> growth modes have been discussed
accordingly
Copper Promotion in CO Adsorption and Dissociation on the Fe(100) Surface
Spin-polarized density functional
theory computations have been carried out to study the adsorption
and dissociation of CO on clean as well as <i>n</i>Cu-adsorbed
and <i>n</i>Cu-substituted Fe(100) surfaces (<i>n</i> = 1–3) at different coverage to explore the Cu promotion
effect in CO activation. Increasing Cu content not only lowers CO
dissociation energies but also increases CO dissociation barriers
as well as making CO dissociation thermodynamically less favorable,
and the clean Fe(100) surface is most active in CO adsorption and
dissociation. The <i>n</i>Cu-substituted Fe(100) surface
can suppress CO adsorption and dissociation more strongly than the <i>n</i>Cu-adsorbed Fe(100) surface. CO stretching frequencies
at different coverages have been computed for assisting experimental
investigations
High Coverage CO Activation Mechanisms on Fe(100) from Computations
CO activation on Fe(100) at different
coverage was systematically
computed on the basis of spin-polarized density functional theory.
At the saturated coverage (11CO) on a <i>p</i>(3 ×
4) surface size (24 exposed Fe atoms), top (1CO), bridge (3CO) and
4-fold hollow (7CO) adsorption configurations coexist. The stepwise
adsorption energies and dissociation barriers at different coverage
reveal equilibriums between desorption and dissociation of adsorbed
CO molecules. It is found that only molecular adsorption is likely
for <i>n</i><sub>CO</sub> = 8–11, and mixed molecular
and dissociative adsorption becomes possible for <i>n</i><sub>CO</sub> = 5–7, while only dissociative adsorption is
favorable for <i>n</i><sub>CO</sub> = 1–4. The computed
CO adsorption configurations and stretching frequencies as well as
desorption temperatures from ab initio thermodynamic analysis agree
well with the available experimental data
Surface Morphology of Cu Adsorption on Different Terminations of the Hägg Iron Carbide (χ-Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>) Phase
Spin-polarized density functional
theory computations have been
carried out to investigate the surface morphology of Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> adsorption on the Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(100),
Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(111), Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(510),
Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(001), and Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(010)
surface terminations in different surface Fe and C ratios. On the
Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(100), and Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(510)
surfaces, aggregation is thermodynamically more favored than dispersion,
while dispersion is more favored than aggregation on the Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(111) surface for <i>n</i> = 2–4, on
the Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(010) surface for <i>n</i> = 2 and on the Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(001) surface for <i>n</i> = 2–4. The difference in structures and stability
at low coverage depends on the stronger Cu–Fe interaction over
the Cu–Cu interaction as well as the location of the adsorption
sites. The adsorption energies do not correlate with the surface Fe
and C ratios. Comparison among the most stable Fe(110), Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(001), and Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(100) surfaces reveals that
the Fe(110) surface has higher Cu affinity than the Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(001) and Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(100) surfaces; and the carbide
surfaces have close Cu affinities; in agreement with the experimental
observations. On all these iron and carbide surfaces, two-dimensional
monolayer surface adsorption configurations are energetically more
favored than the adsorption of three-dimensional Cu<sub><i>n</i></sub> clusters, and it can be expected that the adsorbed Cu atoms
should grow epitaxially as a layer-by-layer mode at the initial stage.
On the metallic Fe(110), Fe(100), Fe(111), and Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(010)
surfaces, the adsorbed Cu atoms are negatively charged; while on the
Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(100), Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(100), Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(111), Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(010), and Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(001) surfaces, the adsorbed Cu atoms are positively
charged. On the Fe<sub>3</sub>CÂ(001) and Fe<sub>5</sub>C<sub>2</sub>(510) surfaces, the adsorbed Cu atoms mainly interacting with surface
Fe atoms are very slightly negatively charged. This trend is in line
with their difference in electronegativity. Our results build the
foundation for further study of the Cu-promotion effect in Fe-based
FTS in particular and for metal-doped heterogeneous catalysis in general
High Coverage Water Aggregation and Dissociation on Fe(100): A Computational Analysis
Water adsorption and dissociation
on the Fe(100) surface at different coverages have been calculated
using density functional theory methods and ab initio thermodynamics.
For the adsorption of (H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub><i>n</i></sub> clusters on the (3 × 4) Fe(100) surface, the adsorption energy
is contributed by direct H<sub>2</sub>O–Fe interaction and
hydrogen bonding. For <i>n</i> = 1–3, direct H<sub>2</sub>O–Fe interaction is dominant, and hydrogen bonding
becomes more important for <i>n</i> = 4–5. For <i>n</i> = 6–8 and 12, structurally different adsorption
configurations have very close energies. Monomeric H<sub>2</sub>O
dissociation is more favored on the clean Fe(100) surface than that
on H<sub>2</sub>O or OH precovered surfaces. O-assisted H<sub>2</sub>O dissociation is favorable kinetically (O + H<sub>2</sub>O = 2OH),
and further OH dissociation is roughly thermo-neutral. With the increase
of surface O coverage (<i>n</i>O, <i>n</i> = 2–7),
further H<sub>2</sub>O dissociation has similar potential energy surfaces,
and H<sub>2</sub> formation from surface adsorbed H atoms becomes
easy, while the desorption energy is close to zero for <i>n</i> = 7. The calculated thermal desorption temperatures of H<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> on clean surface agree well with the available
experiment data. The characteristic desorption temperatures of H<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> coincided at 310 K are controlled by the
kinetics of disproportionation (2OH → O + H<sub>2</sub>O) and
dissociation (2OH → 2O + H<sub>2</sub>) of surface OH groups.
The dispersion corrections (PBE-D2) overestimate slightly the adsorption
energies and temperatures of H<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> on iron
surface. At 0.5 ML coverage (6 × OH), the adsorbed OH groups
at the bridge sites do not share surface iron atoms and form two well-ordered
parallel lines, and each OH group acting as donor and acceptor forms
hydrogen bonding with the adjacent OH groups, in agreement with the
experimentally observed surface structures. At 1 ML coverage of OH
(12 × OH) and O (12 × O), the adsorbed OH groups at the
bridge sites share surface iron atoms and form four well-ordered parallel
lines; and the adsorbed O atoms are located at the hollow sites. Energetic
analysis reveals that 1 ML OH coverage is accessible both kinetically
and thermodynamically, while the formation of 1 ML O coverage is hindered
kinetically since the OH dissociation barrier increases strongly with
the increase of O pro-covered coverage. All these results provide
insights into water-involved reactions catalyzed by iron and broaden
our fundamental understanding into water interaction with metal surfaces
Coverage Dependent Water Dissociative Adsorption on the Clean and O‑Precovered Fe(111) Surfaces
Water dissociative adsorption on
the clean and O-precovered Fe(111)
surfaces at different coverage have been studied using the density
functional theory method (GGA-PBE) and ab initio atomistic thermodynamics.
On the clean p(3 × 3) Fe(111) surface, surface H, O, OH, and
H<sub>2</sub>O species can migrate easily. Considering adsorption
and H-bonding, the adsorbed H<sub>2</sub>O molecules can be dispersed
or aggregated in close energies at low coverage, while in different
aggregations at high coverage, indicating that the adsorbed H<sub>2</sub>O molecules might not have defined structures, as observed
experimentally. On the O-precovered surface (<i>n</i><sub>O</sub> = 1–8), the first dissociation step, <i>n</i>O + H<sub>2</sub>O = (<i>n</i> – 1)O + 2OH, has
a very low barrier and is reversible; and the barriers of the sequential
OH dissociation steps, (<i>n</i> – 1)O + 2OH = <i>n</i>O + H + OH and <i>n</i>O + H + OH = (<i>n</i> + 1)O + 2H, are close (0.9–1.2 eV). All of these
barriers are coverage independent. For OH and H adsorption at 1/3
ML coverage, surface OH forms a trimer (OH)<sub>3</sub> unit, and
surface O forms a regular linear pattern. At one ML coverage, there
are three dispersed (OH)<sub>3</sub> units for OH adsorption and three
well-ordered parallel lines for O adsorption. The average adsorption
energies for OH and O adsorption are coverage independent. Desorption
temperatures of H<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> under ultrahigh vacuum
conditions are computed. Systematic comparison among the Fe(110),
Fe(100), and Fe(111) surfaces reveal their intrinsic differences in
water dissociative adsorption and provide a basic understanding of
water-involved reactions catalyzed by iron and interaction mechanisms
of water interaction with metal surfaces
Coverage-Dependent N<sub>2</sub> Adsorption and Its Modification of Iron Surfaces Structures
Spin-polarized
density functional theory calculations were performed
to investigate N<sub>2</sub> dissociative adsorption on iron (100),
(110), (111), (210), (211), (310), and (321) surfaces. An ordered <i>c</i>(2 × 2) structure was found on Fe(100) at 0.5 monolayer
coverage, which is in excellent agreement with the experiment; and
a <i>c</i>(4 × 2) ordered structure is also found at
0.75 monolayer saturation coverage. Strong surface reconstruction
is found on Fe(110) upon nitrogen adsorption, where the densely packed
(110) is reconstructed into (100)-alike. Under the consideration of
temperature and N<sub>2</sub> partial pressure, the estimated N<sub>2</sub> desorption temperature on Fe(100) at 925 K agrees with the
experimentally detected 920–950 K. In addition, N<sub>2</sub> pretreatment results in Fe(100) to be mostly exposed, while that
of H<sub>2</sub> pretreatment favors Fe(110). Further direct comparison
of N<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> adsorptions has been made to show
their differences and similarities
Results of the combination of cytology and hrHPV testing within the year prior to the histological diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
<p>Results of the combination of cytology and hrHPV testing within the year prior to the histological diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.</p
Comparison of the results of cytology, hrHPV testing, and their combination within the year prior to the histological diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
<p>Comparison of the results of cytology, hrHPV testing, and their combination within the year prior to the histological diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.</p
Cervical cancer histological subtypes in the current study.
<p>Cervical cancer histological subtypes in the current study.</p