37 research outputs found

    Time evolution of mixed solution |<i>u</i>| of the two dimensional nonlocal NLS equation.

    No full text
    <p>Time evolution of mixed solution |<i>u</i>| of the two dimensional nonlocal NLS <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0192281#pone.0192281.e002" target="_blank">eq (2)</a> in (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>) plane with parameters .</p

    Time evolution of rogue waves in two dimensional nonlocal NLS equation.

    No full text
    <p>Time evolution of rogue waves <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0192281#pone.0192281.e019" target="_blank">(15)</a> in two dimensional nonlocal NLS <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0192281#pone.0192281.e002" target="_blank">eq (2)</a> in (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>) plane with parameters λ = 3.</p

    Cultivars, fall dormancy classes, fall dormancy ratings, fall dormancy types and seed sources of alfalfa evaluated in this study at Wuyuan and Hohhot, Inner Mongolia in 2014.

    No full text
    <p>† Number corresponds to fall dormancy class used by the Certified Alfalfa Seed Council (CASC).</p><p>‡ Number corresponds to the value calculated using the University of California regression equation.</p><p>FDC was used by the Certified Alfalfa Seed Council (CASC). FDR represents the actual fall dormancy rating of each check cultivar based on the average University of California regression and the Certified Alfalfa Seed Council Class.</p

    Relationships between internode length and internode number across eleven FD ratings in average (a) and total (b) statistics.

    No full text
    <p>The relationships were tested using Pearson product moment correlations. Averaged statistics: <i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>P</i> = 0.08, <i>n</i> = 11; Total statistics: <i>r = -</i>0.34, <i>P</i><0.01, <i>n</i> = 196. The data were presented by mean ± standard error (SE) in Fig7a. Abbreviations: FD, fall dormancy; FDT, fall dormancy type; SDT, Semi-fall dormancy type; NDT: Non-fall dormancy type; EDT, Extreme non-fall dormancy type.</p

    Relationships of the mean value of the internode length of alfalfa and its variability with different fall dormancy ratings.

    No full text
    <p>(a): Internode length of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings (<i>r</i> = -0.27, <i>P</i><0.01, <i>n</i> = 196); (b): Internode length of alfalfa across four FD categories; (c): Variable coefficients of the internode length of alfalfa across four FD categories (<i>r</i> = 0.42, <i>P</i>>0.05, <i>n</i> = 11); (d): Variable coefficients of the internode length of alfalfa across four FD categories. The relationships of mean value of internode length of alfalfa and its variability with FD ratings were tested by Spearman's rank correlation. The dashed curve shows the 95% confidence band. Abbreviations: FD, fall dormancy; FDT, fall dormancy type; SDT, Semi-fall dormancy type; NDT: Non-fall dormancy type; EDT, Extreme non-fall dormancy type.</p

    Statistical characteristics of the internode number of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings.

    No full text
    <p>Statistical characteristics of the internode number of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings.</p

    Relationships existing between mean value of the internode number of alfalfa and FD ratings or categories, and between variability of the internode number and FD ratings or categories.

    No full text
    <p>(a): Internode number of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings (<i>r</i> = -0.27, <i>P</i><0.01, <i>n</i> = 196); (b): Internode number of alfalfa across four FD categories; (c): Variation coefficients of internode number of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings (<i>r</i> = 0.42, <i>P</i>>0.05, <i>n</i> = 11); (d): Variation coefficients of internode number of alfalfa across four FD categories (<i>r</i> = 0.40, <i>P</i> > 0.05, <i>n</i> = 4). The relationships between mean value of the internode number of alfalfa and FD ratings or categories, and between variability of the internode number and FD ratings or categories were tested by Spearman's rank correlation. The dashed curve is 95% confidence band. Symbols and abbreviations are the same as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0135934#pone.0135934.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a>. Abbreviations: FD, fall dormancy; FDT, fall dormancy type; SDT, Semi-fall dormancy type; NDT: Non-fall dormancy type; EDT, Extreme non-fall dormancy type.</p

    Pearson correlation coefficient between length and number of internode in eleven fall dormancy ratings (a) and four FD categories (b), respectively.

    No full text
    <p>Symbols: **, <i>P</i><0.01; *, <i>P</i><0.05; NS, <i>P</i>>0.05. Abbreviations: FD, fall dormancy; FDT, fall dormancy type; SDT, Semi-fall dormancy type; NDT: Non-fall dormancy type; EDT, Extreme non-fall dormancy type.</p

    Box plots illustrating the distribution of plant height and above-ground biomass of alfalfa among different FD ratings.

    No full text
    <p>(a): Plant height of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings (<i>r</i> = -0.02, <i>P</i> = 0.83, <i>n</i> = 196); (b): Plant height of alfalfa across four FD categories (<i>r</i> = -0.03, <i>P</i> = 0.67, <i>n</i> = 196); (c): Above-ground biomass of alfalfa across eleven FD ratings (<i>r</i> = -0.01, <i>P</i> = 0.96, <i>n</i> = 196); (d): Above-ground biomass of alfalfa across four FD categories (<i>r</i> = -0.04, <i>P</i> = 0.63, <i>n</i> = 196). The relationships of plant height and above-ground biomass with FD ratings were tested by Spearman's rank correlation. Significant differences of FD ratings at 0.05 levels are indicated by different letters. Abbreviations: FD, fall dormancy; FDT, fall dormancy type; SDT, Semi-fall dormancy type; NDT: Non-fall dormancy type; EDT, Extreme non-fall dormancy type.</p
    corecore