Optical Response of Terpyridine Ligands to Zinc Binding: A Close Look at the Substitution Effect by Spectroscopic Studies at Low Temperature

Terpyridine (tpy) ligands are popular building blocks to bind metal ions. Several tpy ligands with different substituents were synthesized and examined for their binding with zinc cation. The study revealed a large substituent effect on the zinc binding-induced fluorescence quenching. With the aid of a liquid nitrogen Dewar, the tpy molecules were frozen to their ground-state conformation, preventing (or minimizing) molecular reorganization in the photoinduced excited state. This allowed us to detect the fluorescence spectra from the locally excited state (having a minimum of charge transfer interaction) and the temperature-dependent fluorescence. The fluorescence response to low temperature provided useful information about the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) interaction between the donor and acceptor groups. Furthermore, a strong donor substituent (such as Me₂N) played an essential role in observed fluorescence quenching. The study also provides a useful example to elucidate the ICT mechanism by using low-temperature fluorescence spectroscopy

Cancer-Risk Module Identification and Module-Based Disease Risk Evaluation: A Case Study on Lung Cancer

<div><p>Gene expression profiles have drawn broad attention in deciphering the pathogenesis of human cancers. Cancer-related gene modules could be identified in co-expression networks and be applied to facilitate cancer research and clinical diagnosis. In this paper, a new method was proposed to identify lung cancer-risk modules and evaluate the module-based disease risks of samples. The results showed that thirty one cancer-risk modules were closely related to the lung cancer genes at the functional level and interactional level, indicating that these modules and genes might synergistically lead to the occurrence of lung cancer. Our method was proved to have good robustness by evaluating the disease risk of samples in eight cancer expression profiles (four for lung cancer and four for other cancers), and had better performance than the WGCNA method. This method could provide assistance to the diagnosis and treatment of cancers and a new clue for explaining cancer mechanisms.</p></div

The robustness of our method and comparison with the WGCNA method.

<p><b>a</b>) X-axis is samples. Y-axis is the lung cancer risk score of individual samples using our method, and it is ranked from the smallest to the largest. Blue represents GSE10072; green represents GSE21933; red represents GSE27262; and brown represents GSE4079. Full lines represent lung cancer samples; and dashed lines represent normal samples. The different experiment data sets have different numbers of the normal samples and the disease samples. In order to show the disease risk of every sample in four expression profiles intuitively, all samples of each expression profiles are distributed uniformly throughout x-axis. <b>b</b>) The figure is plotted the same way as a). The lung cancer risk of each sample is evaluated by the WGCNA method. <b>c</b>) Receiver operator characteristic curve using our method for the four lung cancer expression profiles (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0092395#pone-0092395-g007" target="_blank">Figure 7a</a>). The areas under curve provided at lower right of each diagram. <b>d</b>) Receiver operator characteristic curve using the WGCNA method for the four lung cancer expression profiles (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0092395#pone-0092395-g007" target="_blank">Figure 7b</a>).</p

Lung cancer-risk modules.

<p>Risk is modules category, ID indicate the identifier of cancer-risk modules, size is the module scale, namely the number of genes in the module, genes is the genes in the modules and the genes which were marked * were DE-genes, M_risk is the cancer risk of modules, p-value is significance p value of random randomized test.</p

The lung cancer risk of each sample in GSE7670 by the WGCNA method.

<p>The lung cancer risk of each sample in GSE7670 by the WGCNA method.</p

The relationship network of cancer-risk modules and lung cancer genes.

<p>The circles indicate cancer-risk modules, and the proportion of orange parts indicates cancer risk (<i>M_risk</i>). The disease-causing genes is represented by red triangles. Edges' colors indicate the relationships, purple represents for the protein-protein interaction, green for function sharing, and red for both functional and interaction relationship.</p

Cancer-risk Modules Identification and Module-based Disease risk Evaluation.

<p>Cancer-risk Modules Identification and Module-based Disease risk Evaluation.</p

The number of samples (tumor/normal and high/low expression) for one gene.

<p>T represents tumor samples and N for normal ones, and “+” stands for high expression (above-average) and “-”for low expression (below-average). <i>n₁^T</i> and <i>n₂^T</i> refers to the number of tumor samples with high expression and low expression, and <i>n₁^N</i> and <i>n₂^N</i> for the number of normal ones with high expression and low expression.</p

The lung cancer risk of each sample in GSE7670.

<p>X-axis is samples. Y-axis is the lung cancer risk score of individual samples, and it is ranked from smallest to largest. Red represents lung cancer samples; and blue represents normal samples.</p

Co-expression Level and GO Semantic Similarity.

<p>Purple point means observations, red line indicates the curve fitting, the dotted curve represents the first order tangent.</p