10 research outputs found

    Image_1_Survival nomogram for endometrial cancer with lung metastasis: A SEER database analysis.tif

    No full text
    PurposeThe lung is the most common distant metastatic organ in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) but is rarely reported. This study examines the association between clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) in EC with lung metastasis.MethodsPatients with EC who had accompanying lung metastasis were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and assess OS outcomes related to EC with lung metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards nomogram model for OS was constructed and validated. The calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discriminative ability and clinical benefit of the novel nomogram. Kaplan–Meier curves and scatter diagram analysis were used to investigate the risk stratifications of the nomogram.ResultsOverall, 1542 EC patients with lung metastasis between 2010 and 2017 were included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. A nomogram model was constructed using the clinical characteristics of tumor grade, histological type, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation, brain metastasis and liver metastasis. The concordance indexes (C-indexes) were 0.750 (95% CI, 0.732-0.767) and 0.743 (95% CI, 0.719-0.767) for the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Calibration plots and DCA showed good clinical applicability of the nomogram. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.803 and 0.766 for 1-year and 3-year OS, respectively, indicating that the nomogram model had a stable discriminative ability. An online calculator of our nomogram is available on the internet at https://endometrialcancer.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/. Additionally, patients in the high-risk group had a significantly worse OS than those in the low-risk group.ConclusionAn easy-to-use, highly accurate nomogram was developed for predicting the prognosis of EC patients with lung metastasis.</p

    Table_2_Survival nomogram for endometrial cancer with lung metastasis: A SEER database analysis.xlsx

    No full text
    PurposeThe lung is the most common distant metastatic organ in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) but is rarely reported. This study examines the association between clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) in EC with lung metastasis.MethodsPatients with EC who had accompanying lung metastasis were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and assess OS outcomes related to EC with lung metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards nomogram model for OS was constructed and validated. The calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discriminative ability and clinical benefit of the novel nomogram. Kaplan–Meier curves and scatter diagram analysis were used to investigate the risk stratifications of the nomogram.ResultsOverall, 1542 EC patients with lung metastasis between 2010 and 2017 were included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. A nomogram model was constructed using the clinical characteristics of tumor grade, histological type, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation, brain metastasis and liver metastasis. The concordance indexes (C-indexes) were 0.750 (95% CI, 0.732-0.767) and 0.743 (95% CI, 0.719-0.767) for the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Calibration plots and DCA showed good clinical applicability of the nomogram. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.803 and 0.766 for 1-year and 3-year OS, respectively, indicating that the nomogram model had a stable discriminative ability. An online calculator of our nomogram is available on the internet at https://endometrialcancer.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/. Additionally, patients in the high-risk group had a significantly worse OS than those in the low-risk group.ConclusionAn easy-to-use, highly accurate nomogram was developed for predicting the prognosis of EC patients with lung metastasis.</p

    Image_2_Survival nomogram for endometrial cancer with lung metastasis: A SEER database analysis.tif

    No full text
    PurposeThe lung is the most common distant metastatic organ in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) but is rarely reported. This study examines the association between clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) in EC with lung metastasis.MethodsPatients with EC who had accompanying lung metastasis were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and assess OS outcomes related to EC with lung metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards nomogram model for OS was constructed and validated. The calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discriminative ability and clinical benefit of the novel nomogram. Kaplan–Meier curves and scatter diagram analysis were used to investigate the risk stratifications of the nomogram.ResultsOverall, 1542 EC patients with lung metastasis between 2010 and 2017 were included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. A nomogram model was constructed using the clinical characteristics of tumor grade, histological type, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation, brain metastasis and liver metastasis. The concordance indexes (C-indexes) were 0.750 (95% CI, 0.732-0.767) and 0.743 (95% CI, 0.719-0.767) for the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Calibration plots and DCA showed good clinical applicability of the nomogram. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.803 and 0.766 for 1-year and 3-year OS, respectively, indicating that the nomogram model had a stable discriminative ability. An online calculator of our nomogram is available on the internet at https://endometrialcancer.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/. Additionally, patients in the high-risk group had a significantly worse OS than those in the low-risk group.ConclusionAn easy-to-use, highly accurate nomogram was developed for predicting the prognosis of EC patients with lung metastasis.</p

    Table_1_Survival nomogram for endometrial cancer with lung metastasis: A SEER database analysis.xlsx

    No full text
    PurposeThe lung is the most common distant metastatic organ in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) but is rarely reported. This study examines the association between clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) in EC with lung metastasis.MethodsPatients with EC who had accompanying lung metastasis were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and assess OS outcomes related to EC with lung metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards nomogram model for OS was constructed and validated. The calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discriminative ability and clinical benefit of the novel nomogram. Kaplan–Meier curves and scatter diagram analysis were used to investigate the risk stratifications of the nomogram.ResultsOverall, 1542 EC patients with lung metastasis between 2010 and 2017 were included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. A nomogram model was constructed using the clinical characteristics of tumor grade, histological type, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation, brain metastasis and liver metastasis. The concordance indexes (C-indexes) were 0.750 (95% CI, 0.732-0.767) and 0.743 (95% CI, 0.719-0.767) for the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Calibration plots and DCA showed good clinical applicability of the nomogram. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.803 and 0.766 for 1-year and 3-year OS, respectively, indicating that the nomogram model had a stable discriminative ability. An online calculator of our nomogram is available on the internet at https://endometrialcancer.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/. Additionally, patients in the high-risk group had a significantly worse OS than those in the low-risk group.ConclusionAn easy-to-use, highly accurate nomogram was developed for predicting the prognosis of EC patients with lung metastasis.</p

    3D and M-mode OCM imaging of post-embryonic <i>Drosophila</i> lifecycle.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>a</b>) 3D OCM renderings of a 24B-GAL4/+ <i>Drosophila</i> flies at larva, pupa and adult stages. (<b>b</b>) Schematic representation of heart metamorphosis. Red arrows on larva and adult schematic denote the OCM M-mode imaging locations until PD1 24h and for subsequent time points, respectively. (<b>c</b>) Enface OCM projections showing heart metamorphosis. (<b>d</b>) Axial OCM sections showing heart remodelling during Drosophila lifecycle. * denotes the air bubble location during early hours of pupa development. (<b>e</b>) M-mode images at different developmental stages showing HR changes across lifecycle. (<b>f</b>) Examples demonstrating cardiac activity period (CAP) calculation. Scale bars in (c) and (d) represent 500 μm.</p

    Silencing of <i>dCry</i> resulted in segment polarity phenotypes.

    Get PDF
    <p>(<b>a, c and d</b>) Control larva (24B-GAL4/+) showed regular denticle belts in posterior A6 and A7 segments. (<b>b, e and f</b>) Silencing of <i>dCry</i> (UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4) results in disorganized cuticular morphologies in A6 denticle belt and significantly increased, enlarged and disorganized A7 denticle belt (denoted by arrows). (<b>g, h</b>) Control flies showed normal and organized notum bristles and A6 and A7 denticle belts. (<b>i, j</b>) The few emerged UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4 adult flies showed a smaller notum with disoriented and up-pointing bristles in notum (arrow in <b>i</b>), and disorganized and partially absent A6 and A7 denticle belts (arrow in <b>j</b>).</p

    Silencing of <i>dCry</i> led to abnormal wing vein distribution and Wg expression.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>a, b and c</b>) Control fly with heterozygous <i>En-GAL4; UAS-GFP</i> alone (En-GAL4; UAS-GFP /+) exhibited normal wing. (<b>d, e and f</b>) Silencing of <i>dCry</i> in the wing (UAS-dCry-RNAi/UAS-GFP; En-GAL4) resulted in a marked increase in the acv, pcv (arrows in <b>e</b>), M, L3 and L4 wing veins. L4 vein was disorganized with extra veins in the distal part (arrow in <b>f</b>). (<b>g)</b> Control flies showed normal Wg expression pattern (a broad strip in the notum, a thinner strip in the prospective wing margin-dorsal/ventral (D/V) boundary, and a strip encircling the prospective wing blade). (<b>h)</b> Merged images of the expression of <i>Wg</i> and co-overexpression of GFP in the pattern of <i>En</i> in control flies. (<b>i)</b> In the dCry-RNAi wing discs, Wg expression level was markedly increased and Wg expression pattern was disorganized. (<b>j)</b> Merged images of the expression of Wg and co-overexpression of GFP in the pattern of <i>En</i> in UAS-dCry-RNAi/UAS-GFP; En-GAL4 flies.</p

    Quantitative analysis of functional and structural cardiac parameters in 24B-GAL4/+ and UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4 flies at different developmental stages (a-d).

    No full text
    <p>(<b>a</b>) Heart rate (HR), (<b>b</b>) Cardiac activity period (CAP), (<b>c</b>) End diastolic area (EDA) and (<b>d</b>) End systolic area (ESA). Both groups exhibit similar variations in HR and CAP at most of the early time points; however, differences in functional parameters became more prominent towards late pupa stages. Differences in structural parameters were more significant shortly after heart remodelling, i.e. PD2 40h, PD2 48h and PD3 56h. Red dotted line in <b>(c)</b> and <b>(d)</b> separates measurements obtained from A7 segment during early stages and those obtained from A1 segment during later stages. Black line in (<b>a</b>) represents lack of significant difference in HR between L2 and L3 (p = 0.37); all other time points showed significant difference compared to L2 (p < 0.001). * denote significant difference between 24B-GAL4/+ and UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4 flies at respective time points (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 and ***, p < 0.001). (<b>e</b>) Cardiac developmental diastasis duration. Comparison of (<b>f</b>) EDA and (<b>g</b>) ESA of 24B-GAL4/+ (n = 25) and UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4 (n = 23) flies that emerged as adult flies on adult day 1. Both EDA and ESA were significantly smaller in UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4 flies compared to control flies on adult day 1. Results are shown as mean ± s.e.m.</p

    Silencing of <i>dCry</i> resulted in segment polarity phenotypes.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>a, c and d</b>) Control larva (24B-GAL4/+) showed regular denticle belts in posterior A6 and A7 segments. (<b>b, e and f</b>) Silencing of <i>dCry</i> (UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4) results in disorganized cuticular morphologies in A6 denticle belt and significantly increased, enlarged and disorganized A7 denticle belt (denoted by arrows). (<b>g, h</b>) Control flies showed normal and organized notum bristles and A6 and A7 denticle belts. (<b>i, j</b>) The few emerged UAS-dCry-RNAi; 24B-GAL4 adult flies showed a smaller notum with disoriented and up-pointing bristles in notum (arrow in <b>i</b>), and disorganized and partially absent A6 and A7 denticle belts (arrow in <b>j</b>).</p
    corecore