Occurrence of fever in the first postoperative week does not help to diagnose infection in clean orthopaedic surgery

Postoperative fever is often misinterpreted as a sign of infection, especially when occurring after the third postoperative day. We assessed the epidemiology of postoperative fever in adult orthopaedic patients and its association with infection. Among 1,073 patients participating in a prospective observational study, 198 (19%) had a postoperative fever (>38°C). Thirteen patients (1.2%) had a surgical site infection and 78 patients (7.3%) had remote bacterial infections during their hospital stay. Including asymptomatic bacteriuria, 174 patients were given antibiotic therapy for a median duration of six days. In multivariate analysis, no clinical parameter was associated with fever, including haematoma (odds ratio 0.9, 95%CI 0.6-1.3), infection (1.6, 0.7-3.7), or antibiotic use (1.6, 0.9-3.0). The maximum temperature on each of the first seven postoperative days did not differ between infected and uninfected patients (Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; p > 0.10). We conclude that fever, even up to the seventh postoperative day, is not substantially helpful to distinguish infection from general inflammation in clean orthopaedic surgery

Outcome of diabetic foot infections treated conservatively: a retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot lesion is associated with increased morbidity and high resource use. Although early amputation has been advocated in case of osteomyelitis, conservative treatment is a more attractive alternative. OBJECTIVE: To identify criteria predictive of failure of conservative treatment of diabetic foot ulcer at time of admission to the hospital. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year retrospective cohort study with prospective long-term follow-up of all diabetic patients admitted for a foot lesion at a large (1600-bed) teaching institution. Predetermined criteria were used for the diagnosis and classification of diabetic foot lesions (Wagner classification). Study variables included patient demographics and clinical parameters related to infection and diabetes. The average follow-up after hospital discharge was 2 years. Failure of conservative treatment was the main outcome measure. Independent predictor variables were selected by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 120 diabetic patients were admitted for foot lesions; complications of contiguous osteomyelitis, deep tissue involvement, and/or gangrenous lesions occurred in 78 (74%) of the 105 patients for whom charts were available. Fourteen patients (13%) underwent immediate amputation. Conservative treatment was successful for 57 (63%) of the 91 remaining patients. Success was achieved in 21 (81%) of 26 patients presenting with skin ulcer, 35 (70%) of 50 patients with deep tissue infection or suspected osteomyelitis, and 1 (7%) of 15 patients with gangrene (P<.001, chi2 for trend). Independent factors predictive of failure were the presence of fever (odds ratio [OR]=1.1 per degrees Celcius; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.2) and increased serum creatinine level (OR=1.002 per micromoles per liter; 95% CI, 1.0020-1.0021) on admission, prior hospitalization for diabetic foot lesion (OR=1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6), and gangrenous lesion (OR=1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2). Other patient characteristics, demographics, duration of diabetes mellitus, neutrophil count, or the anatomical site of the lesion failed to predict outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment, including prolonged, culture-guided parenteral and oral antibiotics, is successful without amputation in a large proportion of diabetic patients admitted for a foot skin ulcer or suspected osteomyelitis. Future studies comparing early amputation with novel therapeutic strategies for severe diabetic foot infection should take into account currently identified factors that predicted failure of conservative treatment on admission to the hospital

Noninfectious wound complications in clean surgery: epidemiology, risk factors, and association with antibiotic use

Noninfectious wound complications are frequent and often are confused with and treated as infection

The value of bacterial culture during clean orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 1,036 patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bacterial cultures of the wounds of patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery would help predict infection. METHODS: During 1 year, 1,256 cultures were performed for 1,102 patients who underwent clean orthopedic surgery. Results were analyzed to evaluate their ability to predict postoperative infection. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the cultures were 38%, 92%, 7%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cultures performed during clean orthopedic surgery were not useful for predicting postoperative infection

No need for broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic coverage after surgical drainage of orthopaedic implant infections

Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment for orthopaedic implant infections after surgical lavage is common practice while awaiting microbiological results, but lacks evidence