Factors Affecting Women's Participation in Cardiovascular Research: A Scoping Review

AIMS: Women are underrepresented in cardiovascular trials. We sought to explore the proportional representation of women in contemporary cardiovascular research and the factors (barriers and enablers) that affect their participation in cardiovascular studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multiple electronic databases were searched between January 2011 and September 2021 to identify papers that defined underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular research and/or reported sex-based differences in participating in cardiovascular research and/or barriers for women to participate in cardiovascular research. Data extraction was undertaken independently by two authors using a standardised data collection form. Results were summarised using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis as appropriate.From 548 identified papers, 10 papers were included. Of those, four were conducted prospectively and six were retrospective studies. Five of the retrospective studies involved secondary analysis of trial data including over 780 trials in over 1.1 million participants. Overall, women were reported to be underrepresented in heart failure, coronary disease, myocardial infarction and arrhythmia trials, compared to men. Barriers to participation included lack of information and understanding of the research, trial-related procedures, the perceived health status of the participant and patient-specific factors including travel, childcare availability and cost. A significantly higher likelihood of research participation was reported by women following a patient educational intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the underrepresentation of women in a range of cardiovascular trials. Several barriers to women's participation in cardiovascular studies were identified. Researchers could mitigate against these in future trial planning and delivery to increase women's participation in cardiovascular research. REGISTRATION: The protocol was published on the public Open Science Framework (OSF) platform on 13th August 2021 (no registration reference provided) and can be accessed at https://osf.io/ny4fd/

Effect of three wound dressings on infection, healing comfort, and cost in patients with sternotomy wounds - a randomized trial

Study objective: To compare three dressing types in terms of their ability to protect against infection and promote healing, patient comfort, and cost-effectiveness.Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial.Setting: Major metropolitan, academically affiliated, tertiary referral center.Patients: Seven hundred thirty-seven patients were randomized to receive a dry absorbent dressing (n = 243) [Primapore; Smith &amp; Nephew; Sydney, NSW, Australia], a hydrocolloid dressing (n = 267) [Duoderm Thin ConvaTec; Mulgrave, VIC, Australia], or a hydroactive dressing (n = 227) [Opsite; Smith &amp; Nephew] in the operating theater on skin closure.Results: There was no difference in the rate of wound infection or wound healing between treatment groups. The Primapore dressing was the most comfortable and cost-effective dressing option for the sternotomy wound. Duoderm Thin dressings were associated with increased wound exudate (p &lt; 0.001), poor dressing integrity (p &lt; 0.001), more frequent dressing changes (p &lt; 0.001), more discomfort with removal (p &lt; 0.05), and increased cost (p &lt; 0.001).Conclusions: In the context of no additional benefit for the prevention of wound infection or the rate of wound healing for any of the three dressing products examined, dry absorbent dressings are the most comfortable and cost-effective products for sternotomy wounds following cardiac surgery.<br /

Antecedents to postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in adults after cardiac surgery

The previously unexplored trajectory of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction was mapped in adults having cardiac surgery. Factors including hypoxaemia, positive fluid balance, severe pain and impaired functional status were associated with the development of pulmonary dysfunction and pneumonia. These antecedents are amenable to treatment in the form of prompt preventative nursing intervention that has a fundamental influence on patient outcome

Variable definitions: implications for the prediction of pulmonary complications after adult cardiac surgery

Aim: The aim of this paper was to review the implications that variable definitions have for the prediction of post-operative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery.Method: A review of the literature from 1980 to 2002. Selected studies demonstrated an original attempt to examine multivariate associations between pre, intra or post-operative antecedents and pulmonary outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Reports that described the validation of established clinical prediction rules, testing interventions or research conducted in non-human cohorts were excluded from this review.Results: Consistently, variable factor and outcome definitions are combined for the development of multivariate prediction models that subsequently have limited clinical value. Despite being prevalent there are very few attempts to examine post-operative pulmonary complications (PPC) as endpoints in isolation. The trajectory of pulmonary dysfunction that precedes complications in the post-operative context is not clear. As such there is little knowledge of post-operative antecedents to PPC that are invariably excluded from model development.Conclusion: Multivariate clinical prediction rules that incorporate antecedent patient and process factors from the continuum of cardiovascular care for specific pulmonary outcomes are recommended. Models such as these would be useful for practice, policy and quality improvement.<br /

Clinical nurses` response to an environment of health care reform and organizational restructuring

The aim of this paper is to provide an explanation for clinicians\u27 undisputed acceptance of change. This will be performed by examining the process of organizational restructuring across three analytical levels &ndash; the macro, meso and micro; identifying the consequences of restructuring for clinical nurses\u27 performance; and evaluating organizational restructuring using a micro-political theoretical framework.<br /

Postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in adults after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: clinical significance and implications for practice

Postoperative pulmonary complications are the most frequent and significant contributor to morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with hospitalization. Interestingly, despite the prevalence of these complications in cardiac surgical patients, recognition, diagnosis, and management of this problem vary widely. In addition, little information is available on the continuum between routine postoperative pulmonary dysfunction and postoperative pulmonary complications. The course of events from pulmonary dysfunction associated with surgery to discharge from the hospital in cardiac patients is largely unexplored. In the absence of evidence-based practice guidelines for the care of cardiac surgical patients with postoperative pulmonary dysfunction, an understanding of the path ophysiological basis of the development of postoperative pulmonary complications is fundamental to enable clinicians to assess the value of current management interventions. Previous research on postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in adults undergoing cardiac surgery is reviewed, with an emphasis on the pathogenesis of this problem, implications for clinical nursing practice, and possibilities for future research.<br /

Cardiac Surgery in Australia During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic

In this issue of Heart, Lung and Circulation, McNamara and colleagues report a 21% reduction in the cardiac surgical caseload from a single centre during the first Australian wave of the COVID-19 pandemic from March to June 2020. Globally, elective cardiac surgery ground to a halt and as the pandemic rapidly escalated, centres in Australia and New Zealand were able to benefit from the collective experiences of those in the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, Italy and the United States. A year on, we now have the benefit of not only understanding the immediate effect of pandemic surge but also the implications of elective surgery cancellations in the context of revising the definition of cardiac surgical urgency. As the pandemic continues to unfold, it is essential that we emphasise the importance of the acute benefits of cardiac surgery, that in contrast to many other elective surgeries, disproportionately saves lives